Biophysical Basis of the in vivo Electroretinogram of the Mouse: Current Source Density Analysis of Genetically and Pharmacologically Isolated Rod photoreceptor-driven Currents

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT To better understand the molecular basis of the mouse electroretinogram (ERG) we have developed a biophysical model of the rod photoreceptor layer’s ionic mechanisms and applied current source-density (CSD) analysis to predict the genetically and pharmacologically isolated rod ERG a -wave. The saturating a -wave is characterized by a rapid relaxation (τ ~ 6 ms) from its maximum that has been hypothesized to be caused by HCN1 channel opening consequent to light-triggered sustained hyperpolarization, or by extracellular flow of capacitive current during hyperpolarization. To test these hypotheses, the CSD model included an ensemble of 11 rods with cell body locations spanning the outer nuclear layer, and with ionic mechanisms -- including CNG channels, NCKX in the outer segment, NKX, Kv2.1 channels in the inner segment, and HCN1 throughout the “non-outer segment” -- fully specified as to axial distributions, voltage dependencies, and the extracellular conductivity of the photoreceptor layer extracellular space. Predicting with CSD the steady-state axial distributions of rod dark current and transretinal potential, and the spatio-temporal response of the activation phase of the rod’s light response to intense stimuli, the analysis confirmed the Robson-Frishman hypothesis that extracellular capacitive current flowing towards the inner segment upon the rapid closure of CNG current plays a major role in shaping the early a -wave. The CSD analysis also reveals that extracellular current from HCN1 channels opened by the hyperpolarization contributes a net extracellular current flowing toward the ONL that contributes materially to the saturated a -wave relaxation and to setting its plateau level.
Full text 1,799 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT To better understand the molecular basis of the mouse electroretinogram (ERG) we have developed a biophysical model of the rod photoreceptor layer’s ionic mechanisms and applied current source-density (CSD) analysis to predict the genetically and pharmacologically isolated rod ERG a-wave. The saturating a-wave is characterized by a rapid relaxation (τ ~ 6 ms) from its maximum that has been hypothesized to be caused by HCN1 channel opening consequent to light-triggered sustained hyperpolarization, or by extracellular flow of capacitive current during hyperpolarization. To test these hypotheses, the CSD model included an ensemble of 11 rods with cell body locations spanning the outer nuclear layer, and with ionic mechanisms -- including CNG channels, NCKX in the outer segment, NKX, Kv2.1 channels in the inner segment, and HCN1 throughout the “non-outer segment” -- fully specified as to axial distributions, voltage dependencies, and the extracellular conductivity of the photoreceptor layer extracellular space. Predicting with CSD the steady-state axial distributions of rod dark current and transretinal potential, and the spatio-temporal response of the activation phase of the rod’s light response to intense stimuli, the analysis confirmed the Robson-Frishman hypothesis that extracellular capacitive current flowing towards the inner segment upon the rapid closure of CNG current plays a major role in shaping the early a-wave. The CSD analysis also reveals that extracellular current from HCN1 channels opened by the hyperpolarization contributes a net extracellular current flowing toward the ONL that contributes materially to the saturated a-wave relaxation and to setting its plateau level. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00