Beta-Blocking Pavlov’s Bells: Propranolol Attenuates Compound Extinction in an Error-Dependent Manner

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,180 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract A significant limitation of extinction-based therapies is their failure to be expressed across time and different contexts. The re-emergence of the original behaviour provides evidence that extinction training does not erase the original learning but rather relies on new learning that suppresses the expression of the original behaviour. Thus, a strategy for reducing relapse phenomena is to enhance the inhibitory learning that occurs during extinction training so that extinction is more robust. One such strategy is compound extinction where a combination of previously reinforced stimuli are presented together for the first time during extinction training. This treatment has been shown to enhance extinction learning, evidenced by reduced future spontaneous recovery. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood. Experiment 1 assessed whether the compound extinction effect is the result of increased expectation of reward generated by the compound of stimuli that is then violated, driving further learning, or more simply, the novelty of the compound which reengages attention and thus promotes extinction without increasing prediction error. Experiment 2 tested whether the effects of the noradrenaline beta-receptor antagonist propranolol, shown elsewhere to reduce the compound extinction effect, relate to prediction error or novelty. We found that, when equating the novelty of the stimulus compound, larger prediction error resulted in better extinction evidenced as reduced spontaneous recovery. Further, we found that propranolol reduced this effect suggesting that prediction error rather than novelty is important for both the behavioural and pharmacological effects. Together our results point to behavioural and pharmacological strategies that can be used to improve the long-term expression of extinction. Highlights Increasing prediction error during extinction enhances extinction retention This effect is not explained by stimulus novelty Blocking beta-noradrenergic signaling attenuates the compound stimulus effect Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Abbreviations - (DS) - Discriminative Stimulus

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00