Insect Pests on the Move: Climate, Soil, Land Use, and the Search for Contingent Generality

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,550 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Climate change is reshaping the geographic distributions of insect pests, with major consequences for agriculture, forestry, and ecosystem stability. Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to project these changes, yet most rely primarily on climatic predictors and implicitly assume a degree of generality in species responses that may not hold across diverse taxa. Here, we evaluate how 62 globally important insect pest species respond to climate change and to non-climatic predictor variables, asking whether their responses exhibit global generality, idiosyncrasy, or intermediate forms of contingent generality. We constructed correlative SDMs using multiple algorithms and predictor sets (climate only; climate + land use; climate + soil; climate + land + soil) and projected distributions under two emissions scenarios (SSP1–2.6 and SSP5–8.5) and two future time horizons (2020s and 2080s). Climate change produced strong aggregate trends, including poleward shifts and declining similarity between future and historical distributions, but species-level responses were highly heterogeneous in both magnitude and direction. Trait-based analyses revealed patterns of contingent generality structured by taxonomic order, feeding guild, and habitat association. Adding land-use variables consistently improved model performance more than adding soil variables, while combining both predictors was typically subadditive. Further analyses showed that land-use effects reorganize climate-response predictions for specific subsets of species, whereas soil effects were weaker and more context-dependent. Together, these results demonstrate that insect pest responses to climate change and model complexity are neither uniform nor random, but structured by ecologically meaningful contingencies. Recognizing and explicitly incorporating contingent generality can improve the interpretation, performance, and policy relevance of SDMs under global change. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JM2J Subjects Agriculture, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology

Keywords

insect pests, climate change, species distribution models, contingent generality, land-use, trait-based analysis Dates Published: 2026-02-09 09:33 Last Updated: 2026-02-09 09:33 License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6hdr7srfd Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00