Full text
1,894 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
DNA methylation analysis using bisulfite sequencing is widely used to investigate epigenetic regulation at single-base resolution; however, conventional analysis workflows primarily rely on site-wise averaging, which obscures contiguous methylation patterns encoded within individual DNA molecules and limits interpretation of epiallelic heterogeneity in targeted amplicon studies. Here, we present PANDA (Phased ANalysis of DNA Amplicons), an end-to-end graphical pipeline that restores contiguous single-molecule methylation patterns by linking unmerged paired-end reads to reconstruct epiallelic patterns across unsequenced regions. PANDA supports both Sanger and next-generation sequencing inputs, providing a unified workflow for alignment, read-level methylation calling, phased visualization, and quantification of within-sample methylation heterogeneity. Using synthetic benchmarking datasets, we demonstrated that in silico motif filtering isolates specific target reads, enabling the accurate detection of allele-specific methylation and loss of imprinting. Furthermore, the re-analysis of primate placentae datasets confirmed that long-range phasing across unsequenced regions successfully restored the original epiallelic architectures. PANDA establishes a robust, practical approach to single-molecule epigenomic profiling using targeted bisulfite amplicon sequencing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Abbreviations
- ASM
- allele-specific methylation
- DMR
- differentially methylated region
- FDR
- false discovery rate
- LOI
- loss of imprinting
- NGS
- next-generation sequencing
- PDR
- proportion of discordant reads
- QC
- quality control
- qFDRP
- quantitative fraction of discordant read pairs
- RMSE
- root mean square error
- SD
- standard deviation
- SNP
- single-nucleotide polymorphism
- TF
- transcription factor
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.