Missing two key parameters in the pooled testing strategy
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Abstract The pooled testing strategy [1] misses two key parameters, the infection prevalence p and its variance mentioned many times in the paper as the key determinants of any pooled testing strategy. For illustrating their methods, the authors used p from other studies that employed individual tests. It turned that that no statistical estimators for p and its variance have ever been derived for testing data of pooled samples since the first formulation of testing strategies based on pooled sampled in 1943 [2]. Here I derive the maximum likelihood estimators for p and its variance based on tests of pooled samples. This should result in significant saving in time, resource, and costs.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00