Prophylactic ureteral suturing after ureterolysis in deep endometriosis: description of a conservative laparoscopic technique

Observational OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This paper describes a novel laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing, used to repair weakened ureters after deep endometriosis surgery, showing no complications in six patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper describes the development and initial application of a novel conservative laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing (PUS), in selected patients with deep ureteral endometriosis requiring extensive ureterolysis. After cystoscopic placement of a double-J stent, periureteral fibrosis was dissected and ureterolysis used to restore mobility; a segment with mucosa-only wall involvement (loss of the muscularis layer) was reconstructed by mobilizing and reapproximating proximal and distal muscularis layers with interrupted absorbable sutures while avoiding mucosal penetration. In an observational cohort of 6 patients, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and renal function was preserved, with follow-up imaging showing resolution of obstruction and normalization of creatinine in those presenting with preoperative hydronephrosis and elevated creatinine; the main limitation is the very small, observational sample requiring further long-term study. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on a prophylactic ureteral suturing method to reinforce structurally weakened ureter segments after ureterolysis in deep endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To describe a novel laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing (PUS), developed to reinforce structurally weakened ureteral segments following extensive ureterolysis for deep endometriosis, to avoid segmental resection or reimplantation. METHODS: In selected patients with deep ureteral endometriosis, circumferential periureteral fibrosis was dissected after cystoscopic insertion of a double-J ureteral stent. Laparoscopic ureterolysis restored ureteral mobility and revealed a mucosa-only segment, considered at high risk of postoperative stricture or rupture, resulting from complete loss of the muscularis layer. The muscularis layers proximal and distal to the mucosal tract were then gently mobilized and reapproximated using interrupted absorbable 3-0 polyglactin sutures, avoiding mucosal penetration. This suture-based reconstruction restored circumferential wall support while maintaining luminal patency. RESULTS: An observational study was conducted on a cohort of 6 patients using the novel technique. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Renal function was preserved in all cases. Among three patients with preoperative hydronephrosis and elevated creatinine, imaging confirmed resolution of obstruction and normalization of renal parameters at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic ureteral suturing may represent a safe and effective conservative alternative to reconstructive procedures in cases of ureteral muscularis loss during ureterolysis. The approach is technically straightforward, preserves ureteral continuity and the native antireflux mechanism, and can be integrated into standard laparoscopic treatment of urinary tract endometriosis. Further studies are warranted to confirm its long-term safety and broader applicability.
Full text 2,802 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Background

To describe a novel laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing (PUS), developed to reinforce structurally weakened ureteral segments following extensive ureterolysis for deep endometriosis, to avoid segmental resection or reimplantation.

Methods

In selected patients with deep ureteral endometriosis, circumferential periureteral fibrosis was dissected after cystoscopic insertion of a double-J ureteral stent. Laparoscopic ureterolysis restored ureteral mobility and revealed a mucosa-only segment, considered at high risk of postoperative stricture or rupture, resulting from complete loss of the muscularis layer. The muscularis layers proximal and distal to the mucosal tract were then gently mobilized and reapproximated using interrupted absorbable 3-0 polyglactin sutures, avoiding mucosal penetration. This suture-based reconstruction restored circumferential wall support while maintaining luminal patency.

Results

An observational study was conducted on a cohort of 6 patients using the novel technique. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Renal function was preserved in all cases. Among three patients with preoperative hydronephrosis and elevated creatinine, imaging confirmed resolution of obstruction and normalization of renal parameters at follow-up.

Conclusions

Prophylactic ureteral suturing may represent a safe and effective conservative alternative to reconstructive procedures in cases of ureteral muscularis loss during ureterolysis. The approach is technically straightforward, preserves ureteral continuity and the native antireflux mechanism, and can be integrated into standard laparoscopic treatment of urinary tract endometriosis. Further studies are warranted to confirm its long-term safety and broader applicability. KEY WORDS: Endometriosis; Ureter; Urologic surgical procedures; Laparoscopy; Ureteral diseases; Sutures

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 1
creatinine

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:09:56.316927+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:04:03.526948+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-06-28T09:31:30.222730+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine