Prophylactic ureteral suturing after ureterolysis in deep endometriosis: description of a conservative laparoscopic technique
This paper describes a novel laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing, used to repair weakened ureters after deep endometriosis surgery, showing no complications in six patients.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper describes the development and initial application of a novel conservative laparoscopic technique, prophylactic ureteral suturing (PUS), in selected patients with deep ureteral endometriosis requiring extensive ureterolysis. After cystoscopic placement of a double-J stent, periureteral fibrosis was dissected and ureterolysis used to restore mobility; a segment with mucosa-only wall involvement (loss of the muscularis layer) was reconstructed by mobilizing and reapproximating proximal and distal muscularis layers with interrupted absorbable sutures while avoiding mucosal penetration. In an observational cohort of 6 patients, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications and renal function was preserved, with follow-up imaging showing resolution of obstruction and normalization of creatinine in those presenting with preoperative hydronephrosis and elevated creatinine; the main limitation is the very small, observational sample requiring further long-term study. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on a prophylactic ureteral suturing method to reinforce structurally weakened ureter segments after ureterolysis in deep endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,802 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
SciLite annotations
chemicals 1
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-17T06:09:56.316927+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-17T06:04:03.526948+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-06-28T09:31:30.222730+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine