Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Schizophrenia has been linked to reality monitoring confusions, particularly misattributions of internal productions to external sources. We hypothesized that these misattributions may be related to deficits in processing acoustic cues that distinguish the subjective experience of a sound source inside or outside the head, i.e., sound externalization. This study aimed to investigate sound externalization in patients with schizophrenia, particularly for emotional sounds, as emotion influences auditory perception. In an externalization task, twenty-three patients with schizophrenia and twenty-five healthy controls were exposed to neutral and emotional sounds processed to be perceived as: internalized (diotic) or externalized (filtered with either an anechoic head-related transfer function -HRTF- or a binaural room impulse response -BRIR). Participants had to indicate whether the sound source was perceived inside or outside their head. Exploratory analyses also examined the relationships between externalization, reality monitoring, and symptom severity. Compared to controls, patients with schizophrenia rated the filtered sounds (HRTF, BRIR) as less externalized (p bonf < .001) and the diotic sounds as more externalized (p bonf = 0.004), regardless of emotional content. No significant correlation was found between externalization and reality monitoring. In patients, greater symptom severity was associated with reduced externalization of sounds simulated as originating outside the head. These findings suggest an abnormal perception of sound sources in patients with schizophrenia, who confuse sounds inside and outside the head to a greater extent. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between sound externalization and symptoms such as hallucinations.
Full text 55,563 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia View ORCID Profile Laure Fivel , View ORCID Profile Mathieu Lavandier , View ORCID Profile Nicolas Grimault , View ORCID Profile Fabien Perrin , View ORCID Profile Marine Mondino , View ORCID Profile Frédéric Haesebaert doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.08.25337491 Laure Fivel a Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292 , PSYR2, F-69500 Bron, France d Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier , F-69500 Bron, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Laure Fivel Mathieu Lavandier b ENTPE, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CNRS, LTDS , UMR5513, 69518 Vaulx-en-Velin, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Mathieu Lavandier Nicolas Grimault c Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292 , CAP, F-69500 Bron, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Nicolas Grimault Fabien Perrin c Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292 , CAP, F-69500 Bron, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Fabien Perrin Marine Mondino a Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292 , PSYR2, F-69500 Bron, France d Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier , F-69500 Bron, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Marine Mondino Frédéric Haesebaert a Université Claude Bernard Lyon, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292 , PSYR2, F-69500 Bron, France d Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier , F-69500 Bron, France Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Frédéric Haesebaert For correspondence: frederic.haesebaert{at}ch-le-vinatier.fr Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT Schizophrenia has been linked to reality monitoring confusions, particularly misattributions of internal productions to external sources. We hypothesized that these misattributions may be related to deficits in processing acoustic cues that distinguish the subjective experience of a sound source inside or outside the head, i.e., sound externalization. This study aimed to investigate sound externalization in patients with schizophrenia, particularly for emotional sounds, as emotion influences auditory perception. In an externalization task, twenty-three patients with schizophrenia and twenty-five healthy controls were exposed to neutral and emotional sounds processed to be perceived as: internalized (diotic) or externalized (filtered with either an anechoic head-related transfer function -HRTF- or a binaural room impulse response -BRIR). Participants had to indicate whether the sound source was perceived inside or outside their head. Exploratory analyses also examined the relationships between externalization, reality monitoring, and symptom severity. Compared to controls, patients with schizophrenia rated the filtered sounds (HRTF, BRIR) as less externalized (p bonf < .001) and the diotic sounds as more externalized (p bonf = 0.004), regardless of emotional content. No significant correlation was found between externalization and reality monitoring. In patients, greater symptom severity was associated with reduced externalization of sounds simulated as originating outside the head. These findings suggest an abnormal perception of sound sources in patients with schizophrenia, who confuse sounds inside and outside the head to a greater extent. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between sound externalization and symptoms such as hallucinations. 1. Introduction Schizophrenia, affecting approximately 1% of the population worldwide, is characterized by disruptions in perceptual, cognitive and social abilities that impair daily functioning ( Jauhar et al., 2022 ). A central cognitive disturbance in schizophrenia is the disruption of the self, marked by difficulties in attributing one’s thoughts, actions, emotions, and experiences to oneself, and a tendency to attribute them to others or to external sources. In particular, patients with schizophrenia have difficulties in reality monitoring, the ability to distinguish between their imagination and perceived events ( Brunelin et al., 2007 ; Damiani et al., 2022 ). This impairment is more severe in patients with auditory hallucinations ( Waters et al., 2012 ), who display higher misattribution of internal (imagined) stimuli as coming from an external source. The cognitive underpinnings of reality monitoring deficit remain incompletely understood, but they are thought to involve deficits in the sense of agency, which determines the subjective origin of productions (self or non-self), and perceptual deficits in spatialization, which determines their subjective source/localization (inner or outer space) ( Stephane, 2019 ). The hypothesis of spatialization deficits is supported by studies reporting bidirectional confusions between internal and external spaces in patients with schizophrenia ( Stephane et al., 2010 ). However, investigations into the distinctions between internal and external spaces have predominantly focused on self-generated productions. Further research is needed to clarify whether the spatialization deficit extends beyond self-generated productions to externally presented stimuli, reflecting broader perceptual deficits in schizophrenia. Among perceptual deficits in schizophrenia, auditory perception impairments have been consistently reported ( Dondé et al., 2017 ; Fivel et al., 2023 ), including difficulties in localizing sound sources ( Perrin et al., 2010 ). Research in schizophrenia has primarily focused on the localization of sounds originating from sources located outside the head and received through open ears, in line with most sounds in the natural world. The perception that a sound source is outside the head, referred to as sound externalization (for a review, see Best et al., 2020 ), is thought to rely on various factors such as reverberation and filtering by the body, particularly the head and pinnae ( Catic et al., 2013 ; Risoud et al., 2018 ). In experimental settings, it is possible to manipulate sounds delivered through headphones to simulate their perception as being localized inside or outside the head. Indeed, sound sources can be perceived as if originating from inside the head, or internalized, when both the interaural time and level differences are minimal ( Brimijoin et al., 2013 ), for instance when sounds are presented diotically through headphones. In contrast, sound can be perceived as coming from outside the head, or externalized, despite the use of headphones by applying filters such as a head-related transfer function (HRTF) (Wightman and Kistler, 1988) with the addition of simulated reverberation further enhancing the perception of externalization ( Leclère et al., 2019 ). Investigating how individuals with schizophrenia perceive sounds simulated as originating inside or outside the head, by manipulating their degree of externalization, could shed light on spatialization deficits and their role in reality monitoring impairments. Additionally, the emotional content of auditory information influences both sound localization ( Kryklywy et al., 2013 ) and reality monitoring. While healthy participants are more able to discriminate perceived and imagined words with a negative valence than neutral words ( Kensinger and Schacter, 2006 ), patients with schizophrenia are more likely to misattribute an emotionally negative sentence spoken by themselves as coming from an external source ( Pinheiro et al., 2016 ), suggesting that emotions can lead to source misjudgements. Emotional content may thus influence the degree of perceived externalization. The present study aimed to investigate how individuals with schizophrenia perceive the localization of sound sources depending on their simulated degree of externalization and emotional content, and how it relates to their reality monitoring abilities and symptoms. We hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia would display greater confusion in sound externalization compared to healthy controls, particularly for sounds conveying negative emotions. Additionally, we explored the relationship between externalization, reality monitoring, and symptom severity. We hypothesized that confusions in externalization would be correlated with misattributions of internal productions as coming from an external source, and with symptom severity. By investigating the externalization of sound sources and its interplay with symptoms, we aimed to advance our understanding of perceptual disturbances in schizophrenia. 2. Material and methods 2.1. Participants Twenty-five outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to DSM-5.0 criteria were recruited from Le Vinatier Hospital (Bron, France). Twenty-five healthy controls matched with the patients for age, sex, and education level, were recruited via social networks, universities and hospital staff. Exclusion criteria included medical treatment, current or history of schizophrenia spectrum disorder or other psychiatric conditions and a first-degree relative with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder for healthy controls and, for all participants, history of auditory or neurological impairment, intellectual disability as assessed by Raven’s matrices, and alcohol or substance abuse. Individuals with regular practice of a musical instrument were excluded to prevent potential confounding effects of musical training on sound perception ( Micheyl et al., 2006 ). The study received approval from a local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Mediterranée sud I, France). All participants provided written informed consent. The study was preregistered on February 9, 2021 ( NCT04768335 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04768335 ). Recruitment of participants began on March 30, 2021 and ended on December 22, 2022. 2.2. Psychopathology assessment Schizophrenia symptoms were assessed using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) ( Andreasen, 1990 ; Kay et al., 1988 ), which assesses the positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptoms. 2.3. Procedure Participants completed perceptual and cognitive tasks on a computer in an isolated room with minimal environmental noise. Sounds were delivered through headphones (HD 250 linear II Sennheiser) at a comfortable level for the participants. Before the experimental trials, participants completed a block of practice trials to ensure they understood the instructions. 2.4. Externalization task The externalization task, programmed using OpenSesame v.3.1., was based on Leclère et al. (2019) and used non-verbal vocalizations from the Montreal Affective Voices battery ( Belin et al., 2008 ). These included vowels /a/ pronounced by male and female actors with neutral or emotional (at the highest intensity level) intonation: anger (growl), fear (scream), disgust (grumble), happiness (laugh), sadness (cry). The degree of perceived externalization was manipulated in Matlab R2020b by creating three versions of each sound using filters for sound convolution ( Leclère et al., 2019 ): diotic (no filter, assumed to be perceived as originating from the middle the head - internalized), HRTF-filtered (creating an intermediate level of externalization by simulating the effect of specific body characteristics on the sound waves), and filtered by a binaural room impulse response (BRIR; enhancing the degree of perceived externalization by simulating a reverberant environment). To generate binaural diotic sounds (i.e., stereo sounds), the original monaural vocalizations (sampled at 44100Hz) were duplicated across the two channels (left, right). For binaural filtered sounds, the original sounds were convolved with a HRTF or BRIR measured by Hummersone et al. (2011), using a large cinema-style lecture theatre for the BRIR (room C). To introduce variability in sound source localization in the horizontal plane compared to the diotic sounds (perceived in front/the center), we used HRTFs and BRIRs measured in two left directions relative to the listener (−90°, −60°). Right sources (60°, 90°) were simulated from the left sources by inverting the right and left channels. As azimuths were variability factors, they were not included in the statistical analysis as experimental factors. All sounds were equalized in level by applying the same gain to their left and right channels so that the signal power averaged across the left and right channels was the same for all vocalizations in all conditions. A total of 288 sounds were created and presented, combining 16 sounds * 3 types of sound processing (BRIR, HRTF, diotic) * 6 emotions (neutral, anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness). After each sound, participants were asked to make a binary choice using a keyboard as to the sound source externalization (inside or outside the head). They were given 3 seconds to respond, after which the next sound was presented. Externalization ratings were calculated for each condition as the proportion of trials where the source was perceived outside the head. Participants were expected to have high externalization ratings for BRIR sounds, low ratings for diotic sounds, and intermediate ratings for HRTF sounds ( Leclère et al., 2019 ). 2.5. Reality monitoring task The reality monitoring task, programmed with PsychoPy3 v2020.2.10, was based on the Hear-Imagine task by Brunelin et al. (2008). The task consisted of a presentation phase immediately followed by a test phase. In the presentation phase, 24 neutral French words were visually presented one by one on a computer screen for 3 seconds, preceded by an instruction sentence. Participants were instructed to either listen to the words delivered through headphones or imagine hearing them. The words were pronounced by a neutral male voice. In the test phase, 36 words including the 24 previously presented words and 12 new words, were presented one by one on the computer screen. Participants had to determine whether each word had been presented or not, and if presented, whether it had been heard or imagined. The number of correct source attributions was measured for each source (range 0-12): imagined, heard, and new. Two types of source misattributions were computed: the number of imagined words incorrectly recognized as heard (range 0–12) and the number of heard words incorrectly recognized as imagined (range 0–12). 2.6. Analyses The statistical analyses were conducted using Jamovi (version 2.3.28) and R (version 2023.03), with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. The sociodemographic data were compared between groups using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for quantitative variables. As data did not follow a normal distribution, generalized linear models (GLM) with gamma family and identity link function were used. The GLM was used to investigate the effect of group (patients vs. healthy controls), type of sound processing (BRIR, HRTF, diotic), emotional content (neutral, sadness, happiness, anger, fear, disgust), and their interactions on the externalization ratings. Two GLMs were performed on reality monitoring performance to assess whether correct responses were associated with group and source (imagine, hear, new) and whether misattribution errors were associated with group and type of confusion (imagine-to-hear, hear-to-imagine). When a significant association was observed, post-hoc comparisons (contrasts) were conducted with Bonferroni correction. The relationship between externalization ratings and reality monitoring performance (correct source attributions and source misattributions) was investigated using Spearman correlation. For exploratory analyses, Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship with externalization ratings for each type of sound processing and patient’ symptomatology (PANSS negative subscale, PANSS positive subscale, and SAPS hallucination subscale). Bonferroni correction was applied. 3. Results 3.1. Participant characteristics The analyses were performed on 47 participants (23 patients with schizophrenia and 24 healthy controls), with data from 3 participants excluded due to missing responses on more than 50% of the trials in the externalization task (reaction times > 3 seconds). The participants’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are described in Table 1 . No significant group differences were found for age, education, or sex. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants. 3.2. Externalization ratings across the 3 types of sound processing The GLM on externalization ratings revealed a significant group * type of sound processing interaction (β = −29.75, 95% CI [-38.08, −21.46], p < .001, Supplementary Table 1). Patients with schizophrenia rated diotic sounds as significantly more externalized compared to controls (p bonf = 0.004). Conversely, they rated BRIR (p bonf < .001) and HRTF sounds (p bonf < .001) as significantly less externalized compared to controls ( Table 2 , Figure 1 ). Within each group, there were no significant differences in externalization ratings between BRIR and HRTF sounds (p bonf = 1.00 for both groups). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Externalization ratings in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls for each type of sound processing, pooled for emotional content. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Degree of perceived externalization (sound source perceived as outside the head) for the three types of sound processing (diotic; HRTF: Head Related Transfer Function; BRIR: Binaural Room Impulse Response) in healthy controls (n = 24) and patients with schizophrenia (n = 23). ***p <.001; **p <0.01 . The GLM also revealed significant main effects of group (β = −11.58, 95% CI [-15.15, −8.02], p < .001), type of sound processing (β = 61.50, 95% CI [57.37, 65.68], p < .001) and emotional content (β = 11.86, 95% CI [5.73, 18.01], p < 0.001). Compared to the neutral sounds, sounds conveying fear (p bonf = 0.001) or anger (p bonf = 0.002) were associated with a significantly higher level of perceived externalization, regardless of the type of sound processing or group ( Table 3 , Figure 2 ). The externalization ratings for each type of sound processing and emotional content in participants are displayed in Supplementary Figure 1. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Externalization ratings across the emotional content of sounds. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Degree of perceived externalization (sound source perceived as outside the head) across the six emotional contents of sounds, averaged across participant groups (n = 47) and types of sound processing. Results are presented as mean in percent ± one standard deviation. *p <.05 . 3.3. Reality monitoring task The GLM on the correct source attributions indicated a significant group * source interaction (β = −2.67, 95% CI [-4.61, −0.73], p = 0.008; Figure 3 , Supplementary Table 2). Patients with schizophrenia less accurately recognized the source of imagined words compared with healthy controls (p bonf = 0.04). No significant between-group differences were found for heard or new words (p bonf = 1.00). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Reality monitoring performance presenting the number of correct source attributions for imagined, heard and new words and the number of source misattributions (heard words recognized as imagined and imagined words recognized as heard) in healthy controls (n = 24) compared with patients with schizophrenia (n = 23). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p <.05 . The GLM on the source misattributions revealed no significant interaction between group * type of source misattribution (Supplementary Table 3). 3.4. Relationship between externalization and reality monitoring No correlation was found between externalization ratings and reality monitoring performance, neither within healthy controls and patients separately, nor across the two groups. 3.5. Relationship between externalization and symptomatology A significant negative correlation was found between scores on the PANSS negative subscale and externalization ratings of BRIR sounds (r = −0.47, p = 0.02), whereas no significant correlations were found for diotic and HRTF sounds. In exploratory analyses, the relationships between the externalization of emotional sounds and symptoms were further examined (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Figure 2). The PANSS negative subscale was negatively correlated with the externalization ratings of BRIR (r = −0.44, p = 0.03) and HRTF (r = −0.43, p = 0.03) neutral sounds, and BRIR sounds conveying disgust (r = −0.49, p = 0.01). PANSS positive subscale was correlated positively with the externalization ratings of neutral (r = 0.49, p = 0.03) and happiness diotic sounds (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), and negatively with the externalization ratings of BRIR sounds conveying anger (r = −0.42, p = 0.04). Moreover, SAPS hallucination scores were negatively correlated with the externalization ratings of BRIR (r = - 0.42, p = 0.04) and HRTF (r = −0.43, p = 0.03) sounds conveying fear. None of these correlations reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (threshold at α=0.05/18 = 0.002). 4. Discussion For the first time, we investigated the externalization of sound sources using neutral and emotional vocalizations in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Our results highlighted significant differences in sound externalization between the two groups, but no correlation was found with reality monitoring abilities. Sounds conveying emotions of fear or anger were perceived as more externalized in both groups. Exploratory analyses suggested potential correlations between externalization and patients’ symptomatology, but none reached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction. 4.1. Emotional content of sound modulates the perception of externalization To the best of our knowledge, research on the impact of emotion on sound localization is limited, with most studies focusing on reaction time rather than performance. The current study brings new data in the research field of externalization by suggesting that emotional valence modulates the degree of perceived externalization. Sounds conveying negative emotions, such as anger and fear, were rated as more externalized than neutral sounds, regardless of the group and the type of sound processing. These results may reflect a tendency to attribute danger to the external environment. Fearful or angry voices may signal threat and trigger a response to danger, leading to a bias in processing emotional stimuli, thereby predicting an external cause for these emotions. Interestingly, previous studies revealed that auditory information conveying negative emotional valence reduces self-agency compared to neutral or positive information ( Christensen et al., 2019 ; Yoshie and Haggard, 2013 ). Participants are less likely to attribute action or sound manifestations to themselves when they convey fear or anger. Similarly, healthy controls make more external attributions to negative than to positive events ( Lyon et al., 1999 ). In relation to our results, higher externalization of sources conveying fear or anger could serve as a proxy for self-agency disturbances in a lower-level processing. 4.2. Externalization of sound sources in schizophrenia Healthy controls showed the expected pattern of externalization, with BRIR and HRTF sounds leading to sources perceived as more externalized, and diotic sounds leading to more internalized sources. In contrast, patients with schizophrenia showed lower externalization for BRIR and HRTF sounds compared to controls, and higher externalization for diotic sounds. These confusions could reflect a general deficit of sound localization, as externalization and localization processes share common underlying neurological bases ( Callan et al., 2013 ; Hunter et al., 2003 ). The bidirectional confusions observed in patients may arise from abnormal processing of binaural cues. Binaural cues play a critical role in externalization perception, with less temporal variations in interaural differences leading to reduced perceived externalization, the temporal variations being associated with the effect of reverberation ( Catic et al., 2015 ). Patients with schizophrenia have difficulty in using these cues to localize sounds in space ( Matthews et al., 2013 ), which may explain the observed confusions – namely, the slightly more externalized perception of diotic sounds and the more internalized perception of dichotic reverberant sounds. However, achieving full externalization might require more than binaural cues; it also involves the processing of body filtering (simulated by HRTF) and room reverberation (simulated by BRIR) ( Boyd et al., 2012 ), even if we cannot exclude the possibility that they influence externalization only by causing the temporal variations in binaural cues. Further investigating these acoustical cues in schizophrenia may help to understand which individual factors or combinations contribute to these perceptual confusions and to some extent to associated cognitive processes such as spatial self-representation, since externalization appears indispensable to the ability to situate elements of one’s environment in relation to oneself ( Heine et al., 2021 ). 4.3. Externalization of sound sources in relation to the severity of symptoms The wide variability in externalization ratings in patients with schizophrenia leads us to hypothesize that symptom severity could account for this variability. Higher levels of negative symptoms were associated with lower externalization of neutral sources simulated outside the head (HRTF and BRIR sounds). This finding is consistent with a model suggesting that auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia contribute to poor social and cognitive functioning via negative symptom severity ( Thomas et al., 2017 ). We could speculate that difficulty in perceiving external sources outside the head may contribute to social functioning deficits commonly seen in schizophrenia, such as weak bodily self-representation ( Gallese and Ferri, 2014 ) and impaired social cognition ( Lin et al., 2013 ). However, the absence of a specific scale evaluating negative symptoms prevent us from investigating which subtype of negative symptoms would be most strongly related to externalization confusions. Moreover, we found the hint of an association between hallucination severity and lower externalization of fearful sounds simulated outside the head. Brain activity of patients with auditory hallucinations respond differently to emotional words compared to patients without hallucinations ( Escartí et al., 2010 ) and healthy controls ( Sanjuan et al., 2007 ), especially to negative words. Notably, abnormal increased amygdala activation in resting state and in response to emotional stimuli has been observed in patients with hallucinations. Therefore, auditory perception of fear may contribute to externalization confusions especially in patients with hallucinations. Nevertheless, these hypotheses remain highly speculative, as the observed correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. 4.4. Relationship between externalization of sound sources and reality monitoring Our exploratory investigation found no evidence of a relationship between externalization and reality monitoring. Stephane (2019) suggested that reality monitoring involves two independent processes: self-agency and spatialization. The absence of a link in our study may indicate a more critical role for self-agency than spatialization in reality monitoring. This is consistent with a recent study reporting a significant relationship between self-agency and reality monitoring abilities, although spatialization was not assessed ( Subramaniam et al., 2018 ). Our findings might also be explained by the fact that we did not find evidence of biases in patients’ reality monitoring performance (i.e., patients did not exhibit more ‘imagine-to-hear’ confusions than controls, which is typically observed in schizophrenia ( Brookwell et al., 2013 ; Brunelin et al., 2006 )) although we found that imagined words are less recognized in patients compared to healthy controls. This may be explained by our sample including patients with less severe symptoms than those in previous studies (total PANSS score of 62.8 versus 80.9 in Dondé et al., 2019a ). In addition, half of our patient sample (13/23) had no hallucinations, and the presence of hallucinations has been associated with greater reality monitoring confusions ( Brunelin et al., 2006 ; Woodward et al., 2007 ). Nevertheless, our findings do not allow us to conclude to an absence of relationship between externalization and reality monitoring abilities. Further research is needed to explore the potential implication of externalization in reality monitoring, particularly in patients with auditory hallucinations. 4.5. Limitations and Perspectives Our study presents several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, our results contradict previous studies suggesting that reverberation added in BRIR sounds enhances externalization compared to HRTF ( Leclère et al., 2019 ). The absence of evidence for this effect may indicate that HRTF alone were sufficient to create an external source experience in healthy controls (with > 84% of HRTF sounds perceived outside the head). Another explanation is the use of a binary forced-choice response (outside or inside the head) to evaluate externalization. While this approach, used in prior research ( Brimijoin et al., 2013 ; Ohl et al., 2010 ), may better correspond to the percept being measured, it may make it more challenging to distinguish true from guessed responses, despite explicit instructions emphasizing that there were no right or wrong answers, only individual perception. Some other studies have used a continuous scale ( Kates et al., 2018 ; Leclère et al., 2019 ), which allows for greater response variability but may introduce a reference to distance, potentially misleading to measure externalization ( Best et al., 2020 ). Second, we did not control for attentional engagement, as reduced attention may impair performance, particularly in patients with schizophrenia ( Carter et al., 2010 ). However, we attempted to mitigate this by using a 3 second cut-off for response times, as such delays may indicate attentional lapses. Third, the small sample size limits statistical power, particularly for exploring the effects of emotion on externalization or the relationship between externalization and reality monitoring. Additionally, the absence of a comparative group of patients precludes conclusions about whether externalization confusions are specific to schizophrenia. Finally, our study was not designed to investigate differences between patients with and without hallucinations, or the association with specific types of hallucinations. Auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia can be experienced inside or outside the head ( Copolov et al., 2004 ), with distinct neural correlates for each ( Looijestijn et al., 2013 ). Further studies should explore whether differences in externalization are linked to the nature of hallucinations. Despite these limitations, our findings open new perspectives for therapeutic interventions in schizophrenia. Auditory sensory training has shown benefits in improving auditory perception, cognitive functioning, and reducing symptoms in patients ( Dondé et al., 2019b ). Given that sound externalization can be improved through training with HRTF- or BRIR-filtered sounds ( Mitruț et al., 2015 ; Klein et al., 2017 ), future research should investigate whether such training could address externalization deficits in schizophrenia, potentially improving symptoms. 4.6. Conclusions This study highlights abnormal perception of sound sources in patients with schizophrenia, with increased internal/external confusions. It also provides new insights into externalization, highlighting the role of negative emotions such as fear and anger in increasing perceived externalization. Future research should further investigate sound externalization in schizophrenia and its relation to patients’ symptomatology and higher cognitive processes such as reality monitoring. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Fundings This research is financially supported by the Scientific Council of CH Le Vinatier (#CSRM01). Disclosure Statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. Author Contributions FH: conceptualization; help in the formal analysis; supervision; validation; writing -original draft preparation; writing – review and editing. MM: conceptualization; help in the formal analysis; supervision; validation; writing -original draft; writing – review and editing. FP: conceptualization; help in the formal analysis; methodology; validation. NG: conceptualization; help in the formal analysis; methodology; validation. ML: conceptualization; help in the formal analysis; methodology; validation; writing – review and editing. LF: data curation; writing – original draft preparation; writing – review and editing. Acknowledgement The authors thank Gabrielle CHESNOY for her help with the study design, participant recruitment and patient inclusion. We thank Asako TAKAMATSU for her help with the participant recruitment and data collection. We also thank all the participants of the study. Footnotes ↵ * co-last authorship References ↵ Andreasen NC . Methods for assessing positive and negative symptoms . Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry . 1990 ; 24 : 73 – 88 . doi: 10.1159/000418013 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Belin P , Fillion-Bilodeau S , Gosselin F . The Montreal Affective Voices: a validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing . Behav Res Methods . 2008 May ; 40 ( 2 ): 531 – 9 . doi: 10.3758/brm.40.2.531 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Best V , Baumgartner R , Lavandier M , Majdak P , Kopčo N . Sound Externalization: A Review of Recent Research . Trends Hear . 2020 Jan-Dec ; 24 : 2331216520948390 . doi: 10.1177/2331216520948390 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Boyd AW , Whitmer WM , Soraghan JJ , Akeroyd MA . Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers . J Acoust Soc Am . 2012 Mar ; 131 ( 3 ): EL268 – 74 . doi: 10.1121/1.3687015 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Brimijoin WO , Boyd AW , Akeroyd MA . The contribution of head movement to the externalization and internalization of sounds . PLoS One . 2013 Dec 2; 8 ( 12 ): e83068 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083068 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Brookwell ML , Bentall RP , Varese F . Externalizing biases and hallucinations in source-monitoring, self-monitoring and signal detection studies: a meta-analytic review . Psychol Med . 2013 Dec ; 43 ( 12 ): 2465 – 75 . doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002760 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Brunelin J , Combris M , Poulet E , Kallel L , D’Amato T , Dalery J , Saoud M . Source monitoring deficits in hallucinating compared to non-hallucinating patients with schizophrenia . Eur Psychiatry . 2006 Jun ; 21 ( 4 ): 259 – 61 . doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.01.015 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Brunelin J , d’Amato T , Brun P , Bediou B , Kallel L , Senn M , Poulet E , Saoud M. Impaired verbal source monitoring in schizophrenia: an intermediate trait vulnerability marker? Schizophr Res . 2007 Jan ; 89 ( 1-3 ): 287 – 92 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.08.028 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Brunelin J , Poulet E , Marsella S , Bediou B , Kallel L , Cochet A , et al. Un déficit de mémoire de la source spécifique chez les patients schizophrènes comparés à des volontaires sains et des patients présentant un épisode dépressif majeur . European Review Of Applied Psychology . 2007 Mars; 58 ( 2 ): 105 – 10. doi : 10.1016/j.erap.2006.05.004 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Callan A , Callan DE , Ando H . Neural correlates of sound externalization . Neuroimage . 2013 Feb 1; 66 : 22 – 7 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.057 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Carter JD , Bizzell J , Kim C , Bellion C , Carpenter KL , Dichter G , Belger A . Attention deficits in schizophrenia--preliminary evidence of dissociable transient and sustained deficits . Schizophr Res . 2010 Sep ; 122 ( 1-3 ): 104 – 12 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.019 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Catic J , Santurette S , Buchholz JM , Gran F , Dau T . The effect of interaural-level-difference fluctuations on the externalization of sound . J Acoust Soc Am . 2013 Aug ; 134 ( 2 ): 1232 – 41 . doi: 10.1121/1.4812264 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Catic J , Santurette S , Dau T . The role of reverberation-related binaural cues in the externalization of speech . J Acoust Soc Am . 2015 Aug ; 138 ( 2 ): 1154 – 67 . doi: 10.1121/1.4928132 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Christensen JF , Di Costa S , Beck B , Haggard P . I just lost it! Fear and anger reduce the sense of agency: a study using intentional binding . Exp Brain Res . 2019 May ; 237 ( 5 ): 1205 – 1212 . doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5461-6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Copolov D , Trauer T , Mackinnon A . On the non-significance of internal versus external auditory hallucinations . Schizophr Res . 2004 Jul 1; 69 ( 1 ): 1 – 6 . doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00092-6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Damiani S , Donadeo A , Bassetti N , Salazar-de-Pablo G , Guiot C , Politi P , Fusar-Poli P . Understanding source monitoring subtypes and their relation to psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Psychiatry Clin Neurosci . 2022 May ; 76 ( 5 ): 162 – 171 . doi: 10.1111/pcn.13338 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Dondé C , Luck D , Grot S , Leitman DI , Brunelin J , Haesebaert F . Tone-matching ability in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Schizophr Res . 2017 Mar ; 181 : 94 – 99 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.009 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Dondé C , Mondino M , Leitman DI , Javitt DC , Suaud-Chagny MF , D’Amato T , Brunelin J , Haesebaert F . Are basic auditory processes involved in source-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia? Schizophr Res . 2019a Aug ; 210 : 135 – 142 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.034 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Dondé C , Mondino M , Brunelin J , Haesebaert F . Sensory-targeted cognitive training for schizophrenia . Expert Rev Neurother . 2019b Mar ; 19 ( 3 ): 211 – 225 . doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1581609 . Epub 2019 Feb 20. PMID: 30741038 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Escartí MJ , de la Iglesia-Vayá M , Martí-Bonmatí L , Robles M , Carbonell J , Lull JJ , García-Martí G , Manjón JV , Aguilar EJ , Aleman A , Sanjuán J . Increased amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus activation in schizophrenic patients with auditory hallucinations: an fMRI study using independent component analysis . Schizophr Res . 2010 Mar ; 117 ( 1 ): 31 – 41 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.028 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Fivel L , Mondino M , Brunelin J , Haesebaert F . Basic auditory processing and its relationship with symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review . Psychiatry Res . 2023 May ; 323 : 115144 . doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115144 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gallese V , Ferri F . Psychopathology of the bodily self and the brain: the case of schizophrenia . Psychopathology . 2014 ; 47 ( 6 ): 357 – 64 . doi: 10.1159/000365638 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Heine L , Corneyllie A , Gobert F , Luauté J , Lavandier M , Perrin F . Virtually spatialized sounds enhance auditory processing in healthy participants and patients with a disorder of consciousness . Sci Rep . 2021 Jul 1; 11 ( 1 ): 13702 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93151-6 . PMID: 34211035 ; PMCID: PMC8249625 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Hummersone C , Mason R , and Brookes T . Dynamic precedence effect modeling for source separation in reverberant environments . IEEE trans. Audio Speech Lang. process . 2010 ; 18 , 1867 – 1871 . BRIRs available online. http://iosr.surrey.ac.uk/software/#BRIRs OpenUrl ↵ Hunter MD , Griffiths TD , Farrow TF , Zheng Y , Wilkinson ID , Hegde N , Woods W , Spence SA , Woodruff PW . A neural basis for the perception of voices in external auditory space . Brain . 2003 Jan ; 126 (Pt 1 ): 161 – 9 . doi: 10.1093/brain/awg015 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jauhar S , Johnstone M , McKenna PJ. Schizophrenia . Lancet . 2022 Jan 29; 399 ( 10323 ): 473 – 486 . doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01730-X . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kates JM , Arehart KH , Muralimanohar RK , Sommerfeldt K . Externalization of remote microphone signals using a structural binaural model of the head and pinna . J Acoust Soc Am . 2018 May ; 143 ( 5 ): 2666 . doi: 10.1121/1.5032326 . PMID: 29857749 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kay SR , Opler LA , Lindenmayer JP . Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics . Psychiatry Res . 1988 Jan ; 23 ( 1 ): 99 – 110 . doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(88)90038-8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kensinger EA , Schacter DL . Reality monitoring and memory distortion: effects of negative, arousing content . Mem Cognit . 2006 Mar ; 34 ( 2 ): 251 – 60 . doi: 10.3758/bf03193403 . PMID: 16752589 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Klein F , Werner S , Mayenfels T . Influences of Training on Externalization of Binaural Synthesis in Situations of Room Divergence . Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2017 Mar ; 65 ( 3 ), 178 – 187 . doi: 10.17743/jaes.2016.0072 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Kryklywy JH , Macpherson EA , Greening SG , Mitchell DG . Emotion modulates activity in the ‘what’ but not ‘where’ auditory processing pathway . Neuroimage . 2013 Nov 15; 82 : 295 – 305 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.051 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Leclère T , Lavandier M , Perrin F . On the externalization of sound sources with headphones without reference to a real source . J Acoust Soc Am . 2019 Oct ; 146 ( 4 ): 2309 . doi: 10.1121/1.5128325 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lin CH , Huang CL , Chang YC , Chen PW , Lin CY , Tsai GE , Lane HY . Clinical symptoms, mainly negative symptoms, mediate the influence of neurocognition and social cognition on functional outcome of schizophrenia . Schizophr Res . 2013 May ; 146 ( 1-3 ): 231 – 7 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.009 . Epub 2013 Mar 9. PMID: 23478155 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Looijestijn J , Diederen KM , Goekoop R , Sommer IE , Daalman K , Kahn RS , Hoek HW , Blom JD . The auditory dorsal stream plays a crucial role in projecting hallucinated voices into external space . Schizophr Res . 2013 May ; 146 ( 1-3 ): 314 – 9 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.004 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lyon HM , Startup M , Bentall RP. Social cognition and the manic defense: attributions, selective attention, and self-schema in bipolar affective disorder . J Abnorm Psychol . 1999 May; 108 ( 2 ): 273 – 82 . doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.2.273 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Matthews N , Todd J , Mannion DJ , Finnigan S , Catts S , Michie PT . Impaired processing of binaural temporal cues to auditory scene analysis in schizophrenia . Schizophr Res . 2013 May ; 146 ( 1-3 ): 344 – 8 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.013 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Micheyl C , Delhommeau K , Perrot X , Oxenham AJ . Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination . Hear Res . 2006 Sep ; 219 ( 1-2 ): 36 – 47 . doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.004 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Mitruț O , Moldoveanu A , Moldoveanu F , Negoi I. The role of perceptual feedback training on sound localization accuracy in audio experiments . 2015 Apr . doi: 10.12753/2066-026X-15-074 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Ohl B , Laugesen S , Buchholz J , Dau T. Externalization versus Internalization of Sound in Normal-hearing and Hearing-impaired Listeners . In In Fortschritte der Akustik . Vol. MI. 14 : 25 . Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik . 2010 . OpenUrl ↵ Perrin MA , Butler PD , DiCostanzo J , Forchelli G , Silipo G , Javitt DC . Spatial localization deficits and auditory cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia . Schizophr Res . 2010 Dec ; 124 ( 1-3 ): 161 – 8 . doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.06.004 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Pinheiro AP , Rezaii N , Rauber A , Niznikiewicz M . Is this my voice or yours? The role of emotion and acoustic quality in self-other voice discrimination in schizophrenia . Cogn Neuropsychiatry . 2016 Jul ; 21 ( 4 ): 335 – 353 . doi: 10.1080/13546805.2016.1208611 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Risoud M , Hanson JN , Gauvrit F , Renard C , Lemesre PE , Bonne NX , Vincent C . Sound source localization . Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis . 2018 Aug ; 135 ( 4 ): 259 – 264 . doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.04.009 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Sanjuan J , Lull JJ , Aguilar EJ , Martí-Bonmatí L , Moratal D , Gonzalez JC , Robles M , Keshavan MS . Emotional words induce enhanced brain activity in schizophrenic patients with auditory hallucinations . Psychiatry Res . 2007 Jan 15; 154 ( 1 ): 21 – 9 . doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.04.011 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Stephane M. The Self, Agency and Spatial Externalizations of Inner Verbal Thoughts, and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations . Front Psychiatry . 2019 Sep 19; 10 : 668 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00668 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Stephane M , Kuskowski M , McClannahan K , Surerus C , Nelson K . Evaluation of inner-outer space distinction and verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia . Cogn Neuropsychiatry . 2010 Sep ; 15 ( 5 ): 441 – 50 . doi: 10.1080/13546801003619884 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Subramaniam K , Kothare H , Mizuiri D , Nagarajan SS , Houde JF . Reality Monitoring and Feedback Control of Speech Production Are Related Through Self-Agency . Front Hum Neurosci . 2018 Mar 6; 12 : 82 . doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00082 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Thomas ML , Green MF , Hellemann G , Sugar CA , Tarasenko M , Calkins ME , Greenwood TA , Gur RE , Gur RC , Lazzeroni LC , Nuechterlein KH , Radant AD , Seidman LJ , Shiluk AL , Siever LJ , Silverman JM , Sprock J , Stone WS , Swerdlow NR , Tsuang DW , Tsuang MT , Turetsky BI , Braff DL , Light GA . Modeling Deficits From Early Auditory Information Processing to Psychosocial Functioning in Schizophrenia . JAMA Psychiatry . 2017 Jan 1; 74 ( 1 ): 37 – 46 . doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2980 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Waters F , Woodward T , Allen P , Aleman A , Sommer I . Self-recognition deficits in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: a meta-analysis of the literature . Schizophr Bull . 2012 Jun ; 38 ( 4 ): 741 – 50 . doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq144 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Wightman FL , Kistler DJ . Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation . J Acoust Soc Am . 1989 Feb ; 85 ( 2 ): 868 – 78 . doi: 10.1121/1.397558 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Woodward TS , Menon M , Whitman JC . Source monitoring biases and auditory hallucinations . Cogn Neuropsychiatry . 2007 Nov ; 12 ( 6 ): 477 – 94 . doi: 10.1080/13546800701307198 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yoshie M , Haggard P . Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions . Curr Biol . 2013 Oct 21; 23 ( 20 ): 2028 – 32 . doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 09, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia Laure Fivel , Mathieu Lavandier , Nicolas Grimault , Fabien Perrin , Marine Mondino , Frédéric Haesebaert medRxiv 2025.10.08.25337491; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.08.25337491 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Is it inside my head? Characterization of sound externalization in schizophrenia Laure Fivel , Mathieu Lavandier , Nicolas Grimault , Fabien Perrin , Marine Mondino , Frédéric Haesebaert medRxiv 2025.10.08.25337491; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.08.25337491 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4435) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15229) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6600) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4536) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (541) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15916) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3332) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9232) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00bba7abd40750b',t:'MTc3OTYxOTcxMQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00