Psychiatric morbidity in gynecological outpatients
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
AIM: To assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety in women presenting with gynecological symptoms, to determine how many women with these disorders were receiving treatment for them, and to investigate risk factors for these disorders. METHOD: Two hundred and sixty-four women seeking medical care from gynecology clinics at a specialist women's hospital completed a self-report questionnaire asking about sociodemographics, physical and mental health, personality (neuroticism) and psychosocial stressors. RESULTS: A total of 91 women met the diagnostic criteria for one or more Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) diagnosis. Forty-six (17.4%) met criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD), 15 (5.7%) for panic disorder (PD) and 73 (27.7%) for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Thirty-nine (42.9%) of the 91 women met criteria for two or more disorders. An additional 23 (8.7%) met DSM-IV-TR criteria for minor (sub-threshold) depression. Fifty percent with MDD, 4% with minor depression, 53% with PD and 22% with GAD reported they were receiving treatment. Psychosocial stressors and the neuroticism score were risk factors for both anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression are common amongst women attending a gynecology clinic. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of these disorders and make specific enquiries about their emotional wellbeing.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (26)
- Depressive symptoms are often unrecognized in gynaecological practice via openalex
- doi:10.1017/s0033291797006077 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00048670902970882 via openalex
- W9496435 via openalex
- W1549812429 via openalex
- doi:10.1176/ajp.154.12.1641 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/archinte.158.4.397 via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2000.106580 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2001.116094 via openalex
- doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.115 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.10.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61415-9 via openalex
- W2397783395 via openalex
- W2405043795 via openalex
- W4213393143 via openalex
- W6713547287 via openalex
- doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02471.x via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.272.22.1749 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520220043029 via openalex
- doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02274.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.12.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00048670902970858 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.12.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.010 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:54:30.111693+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK