Variable effects of biocontrol bacteria on potato resistance against black leg caused by soft rot Pectobacteriaceae in the field

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,582 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Blackleg disease in potato, caused by soft rot Pectobacteriaceae, is a substantial cause of loss in seed potato production. Recent research has attempted to identify bacteria with antagonistic activity against several diseases, among which blackleg. However, most biocontrol agents have been tested only in-vitro or in the greenhouse. In this study, we tested the effect of bacterial biocontrol agents in a four-year field experiment against blackleg caused by Pectobacterium brasiliense and Dickeya solani. Effects of the treatments on disease incidence was highly variable between years and also differed between cultivars, soil type and even replicates. Disease incidence was on average higher in sandy soil compared to clay soil and higher in the cultivar Kondor than Mozart. For a subset of the bacterial isolates genome mining could detect the presence of genes involved in the production of antibiotics and siderophores, but this was not correlated with disease incidence in the field. Moreover, most isolates were able to survive in storage on tubers from inoculation until planting. Thus, we conclude that while the used isolates showed the potential for antagonistic activity and were present on tubers when planting, no antagonist treatment could consistently decrease disease incidence. Inoculation of the isolates on the tuber surface might have been insufficient for plant colonization. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Competing interests: The authors declare not to be aware of any competing interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00