Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Introduction of a Combined Education and Skin Antisepsis Intervention

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,194 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Blood culture contamination (BCC) is an important quality concern in clinical microbiology as it can lead to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy in patients and increased workload for laboratory scientists. The Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute recommend BCC rates to be <3% and recently updated guidelines have set a new goal of 1%. The aim of this project was to design and implement interventions to reduce BCC rates at our institution.

Methods

We introduced a combined education and skin antisepsis intervention in a large Model 4 academic teaching hospital in the South of Ireland. BD ChloraPrep™ skin antisepsis applicators (2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol), licensed for use for blood culture collection, were introduced, replacing Clinell® (2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol) wipes. In addition, a multimodal education programme was designed and delivered. This consisted of a video demonstrating the recommended blood culture collection technique using the new applicators as well as simulation training for all interns. The video was uploaded to the intranet as an educational resource available to all staff.

Results

The interventions were implemented in July 2022 and BCC rates pre- and post-intervention were calculated. The average BCC rate for the 12 months preceding the intervention (July 2021-July 2022) was 2.56% with highest rates in the emergency department. This compared to an average rate of 2.2% in the 12 months post-intervention (July 2022-July 2023). In comparing the two rates the reduction in BCC rates between the two periods was not statistically significant (p=0.30).

Conclusion

Overall BCC rates reduced but the difference between the two periods did not reach statistical significance. The resource intensive nature of providing regular and timely feedback of contamination rates and the larger impact of in–person education and training over virtual modalities may explain the modest reduction. Further investments in these areas, particularly in the emergency department will be necessary to further reduce rates in line with new recommendations. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00