Safety of salpingectomy at time of delivery

article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

Salpingectomy at the time of cesarean or postpartum delivery showed no significant difference in perioperative hemoglobin drop compared to traditional tubal ligation, suggesting a safe alternative.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective The most common methods of sterilization during cesarean delivery rely on excision of a mid-segment of the fallopian tube. Contemporary data suggest ovarian cancers may originate in the fimbriae of the fallopian tube; therefore, a strategy of prophylactic salpingectomy (SL) has been adopted during gynecologic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of SL compared to traditional mid-segment excision at time of cesarean and after vaginal delivery through change in perioperative hemoglobin (Hgb).Study design We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing sterilization concurrent with cesarean delivery or in the post-vaginal delivery period between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 in the Mayo Clinic Health System; a community-based practice. In order to test for non-inferiority, 30 patients in each arm (tubal ligation (TL) and SL) were required to detect a pre- and post-operative Hgb difference of 0.5 mg/dL between groups with a power of 80%. Exclusion criteria included: age 50 kg/m2, endometriosis, other concurrent surgical procedures, bleeding disorders, postpartum hemorrhage due to atony, trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), and the presence of ovarian masses.Results One hundred fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. There was no evidence of inferiority in either the post-vaginal delivery or the cesarean groups with a mean difference in pre- and post-op Hgb of 0.18 mg/dL (p = .99) post-cesarean and 0.04 mg/dL post-vaginal delivery with less reduction in Hgb from SL. The mean length of the procedure was 10.0 and 9.9 min (p = .005) longer for SL procedures amongst cesarean and postpartum procedures, respectively. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate differences in blood loss between different techniques. Clamp-cut-tie techniques took longer than all other procedures in both groups.Conclusion This study provides evidence that the practice of salpingectomy at the time of cesarean and post-vaginal delivery may be safe and should form the basis of prospective trials.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Salpingectomy Salpingectomy Sterilization, Tubal Adult Fallopian Tubes Female Humans Pregnancy Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (12)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:11:53.302379+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:35.348889+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK