Image Analysis for Non-Neoplastic Kidney Disease: Utilizing Morphological Segmentation to Improve Quantification of Interstitial Fibrosis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,721 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Interstitial fibrosis (IF) is a hallmark of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a strong predictor of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Current biopsy-based IF assessments rely on subjective visual estimations, limiting reproducibility. Sirius Red staining is widely used for visualizing fibrotic tissue, yet its application in digital pathology is limited by non-specific staining. This study investigates the impact of cortical structure segmentation on fibrosis quantification in Sirius Red-stained, non-neoplastic kidney biopsies. Fibrosis measurements before and after segmentation were compared using two image analysis methods (stain deconvolution and red-green), with ground truth fibrosis measured by point counting and expert pathologist grading. Excluding non-interstitial structures led to a significant reduction of quantified fibrosis and improved correlation with pathology grading and point counting for both the stain deconvolution and the red green method. Bland-Altman analysis showed reduced bias after segmentation: for the deconvolution method, mean difference decreased from +2.5% (95% LoA: -8% to +13%) to +1% (-7% to +9%); for the red-green method, from +3% (-10% to +16%) to +1% (-8% to +10%). Correlation with pathology grading also improved (Spearmans ρ rose from 0.55 to 0.58 for deconvolution and from 0.53 to 0.59 for red-green). These findings confirm that targeted segmentation enhances the accuracy and consistency of automated fibrosis assessment, supporting its integration into digital pathology workflows as a critical step toward reliable quantification of fibrosis in kidney disease. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00