Continuous chlorophyll fluorescence measurements trace sudden cold spell effects on photosynthetic efficiency in a temperate mixed forest

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,802 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Air temperature extremes and fluctuations are expected to become more frequent and have been shown to affect the physiological functioning of temperate forests across Europe. The exposure to sudden cold spells during summer combined with high light intensities can lead to photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) and thereby reduce photosynthetic efficiency. In this study, we aimed to analyse the dynamics of photoinhibition as well as related protection mechanisms of tall tree canopies during such cold spells. Therefore, we continuously assessed leaf level chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) and ecosystem carbon fluxes by eddy covariance in a temperate mixed forest in southern Germany during growing season 2024. While the deciduous, broadleaved F. sylvatica indicated chronic photoinhibition as a response to sudden cold spells, the evergreen, coniferous P. menziesii showed higher tolerance to low air temperatures. Both species increased thermal energy dissipation at PSII during cold spells indicating the activation of protective mechanisms. Likewise, both species exhibited mainly the sustained form of non-photochemical quenching (NPQs) as a reaction to chilling temperatures and high light intensities which maintained elevated during the recovery phases. However, the dynamics of upregulation of photoprotection and recovery processes differed between the two tree species. Furthermore, the integration of ecosystem carbon exchange and continuous leaf level ChlF measurements gave valuable insights into the photosynthetic dynamics of the mixed forest canopy. This study emphasises the importance of the assessment of dynamic responses to future climate impacts on forest ecosystem on different scales. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00