Clonal dynamics of monozygotic twinning in early human embryogenesis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,827 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Monozygotic twins are derived from the split of a single zygote early in embryogenesis. Although it was hypothesized that the timing of twining is overall associated with fetal membrane configuration of twins, i.e., chorionicity and amnionicity, our understanding of early embryonic clonal dynamics underlying human twinning is limited. Here we explored the segregations of early embryonic lineages in 7 dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA), 7 monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA), 8 monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) monozygotic twins, and 1 dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) monozygotic triplets, using post-zygotic early embryonic mutations (EEMs) as endogenous lineage barcodes. Patterns of the early lineage distributions among monozygotic twins revealed three apparent clonal categories, referred to as para-identical, sub-identical, and full-identical twins, which largely correlated with the amnionicity of the twins. Rather, despite conventional wisdom, chorionicity was not substantially associated with early clonal compositions, but with blood exchanges in utero. In sub-identical twins, where one co-twin was clonally a part of the other, our data suggested that the foundation of the latter co-twin was established after acquisition of a median of 6 additional post-zygotic mutations (range: 2–13), corresponding to ∼5 early cell divisions. Additional in-depth analysis on the matched placenta from an MCDA twin suggested that separation of two co-twins can precede the separation of the placenta and embryonic proper, and a single chorion can be formed even with multiclonal origin. Our findings provide insights into the clonal dynamics, twinning processes, and cell fate decisions in early human embryogenesis. Competing Interest Statement Y.S.J. is a co-founder of Inocras Inc. Footnotes ↵@ Co-corresponding authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00