Reducing the environmental impact of pig production using organic acid- preserved cereal grains: A life cycle assessment

Reducing the environmental impact of pig production using organic acid- preserved cereal grains: A life cycle assessment | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Reducing the environmental impact of pig production using organic acid- preserved cereal grains: A life cycle assessment Shane Maher, Nicholas M. Holden, Torres Sweeney, John V. O'Doherty This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Feed is a major cost and environmental hotspot in pig production, driven by the resource-intensive nature of grain cultivation, processing, preservation, and transport. This study compared the environmental impacts of conventional grain drying at harvest with organic acid (OA) preservation of wheat and barley, and evaluated the effects of feeding these grains to sows and their progeny under commercial conditions. A cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using primary data, encompassing crop production, grain preservation (drying or OA preservation), feed manufacture, transport, and animal rearing, while excluding manure management. Four dietary treatments were evaluated based on the grain used in sow and progeny diets: (1) dried (sow)-dried (progeny), (2) dried-preserved, (3) preserved-dried, and (4) preserved-preserved. At the grain store gate, OA preservation reduced the global warming, acidification, and eutrophication impacts of wheat by 18%, 6%, and 5%, and of barley by 15%, 5%, and 5% respectively (P<0.001), primarily due to the elimination of fossil fuel use during drying. This resulted in reductions in fossil fuel depletion of 81% for wheat and 74% for barley (P<0.001). At the pig production level, replacing dried grain with preserved grain in sow diets during late gestation and lactation reduced progeny impacts by 3–4% across all impact categories, while direct inclusion of preserved grain in progeny diets achieved larger reductions of 7–8% (P<0.001). The preserved-preserved system delivered the greatest overall reductions relative to the dried-dried control, decreasing global warming by 11%, acidification by 12%, and eutrophication by 12%. Given the urgency for agriculture to adopt more sustainable practices, these findings demonstrate that integrating OA-preserved cereals into sow and progeny diets can substantially reduce the environmental footprint of pig production. Commercial-scale implementation and economic assessment are now warranted to support wider adoption of OA preservation within pig supply chains. Grain preservation Organic acids Pigs Sustainability Life cycle assessment Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8395751","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":620229412,"identity":"c336e645-1cc5-4b46-8de5-a7d1dff20dcb","order_by":0,"name":"Shane Maher","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shane","middleName":"","lastName":"Maher","suffix":""},{"id":620229413,"identity":"7be4075b-95d5-4c7e-814b-3400b6e5c9b6","order_by":1,"name":"Nicholas M. Holden","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nicholas","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Holden","suffix":""},{"id":620229414,"identity":"773ea026-8d56-4913-a208-0b6066a3cc2c","order_by":2,"name":"Torres Sweeney","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Torres","middleName":"","lastName":"Sweeney","suffix":""},{"id":620229415,"identity":"a910a2bc-9c27-4bb4-b56d-661fcc6c1752","order_by":3,"name":"John V. O'Doherty","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"John","middleName":"V.","lastName":"O'Doherty","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-18 13:08:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106725300,"identity":"0bc4fcfc-6747-4357-a5bb-b8a6867b3fa8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-12 18:32:20","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":470154,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SubmissionIDb47abb4e88df42d491c8e20dd6d648b4.v1.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8395751/v1_covered_08347597-53f8-448a-b68a-6747e107162b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Reducing the environmental impact of pig production using organic acid- preserved cereal grains: A life cycle assessment","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Grain preservation, Organic acids, Pigs, Sustainability, Life cycle assessment","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Feed is a major cost and environmental hotspot in pig production, driven by the resource-intensive nature of grain cultivation, processing, preservation, and transport. This study compared the environmental impacts of conventional grain drying at harvest with organic acid (OA) preservation of wheat and barley, and evaluated the effects of feeding these grains to sows and their progeny under commercial conditions. A cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using primary data, encompassing crop production, grain preservation (drying or OA preservation), feed manufacture, transport, and animal rearing, while excluding manure management. Four dietary treatments were evaluated based on the grain used in sow and progeny diets: (1) dried (sow)-dried (progeny), (2) dried-preserved, (3) preserved-dried, and (4) preserved-preserved. At the grain store gate, OA preservation reduced the global warming, acidification, and eutrophication impacts of wheat by 18%, 6%, and 5%, and of barley by 15%, 5%, and 5% respectively (P\u003c0.001), primarily due to the elimination of fossil fuel use during drying. This resulted in reductions in fossil fuel depletion of 81% for wheat and 74% for barley (P\u003c0.001). At the pig production level, replacing dried grain with preserved grain in sow diets during late gestation and lactation reduced progeny impacts by 3–4% across all impact categories, while direct inclusion of preserved grain in progeny diets achieved larger reductions of 7–8% (P\u003c0.001). The preserved-preserved system delivered the greatest overall reductions relative to the dried-dried control, decreasing global warming by 11%, acidification by 12%, and eutrophication by 12%. Given the urgency for agriculture to adopt more sustainable practices, these findings demonstrate that integrating OA-preserved cereals into sow and progeny diets can substantially reduce the environmental footprint of pig production. Commercial-scale implementation and economic assessment are now warranted to support wider adoption of OA preservation within pig supply chains.","manuscriptTitle":"Reducing the environmental impact of pig production using organic acid- preserved cereal grains: A life cycle assessment","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-10 10:15:45","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8395751/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2d72d261-641f-419d-a8e2-43861c984da0","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 10th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-10T10:15:45+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-10 10:15:45","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8395751","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8395751","identity":"rs-8395751","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}