Abstract
Scar endometriosis can be located at the skin, subcutaneously in the uterine scar and intraperitone-
ally. The incidence reported of abdominal scar endometriosis is 0.03 to 0.4%. Cyclical pain in the scar asso-
ciated with the patients menstrual cycle is common. MRI is the most sensitive imaging method. Histopatho-
logical evaluation are confirmatory for the condition. Surgical excision of the scar is the treatment of
choice. We report a case of caesarean section scar endometriosis treated at a medical college hospital.
Keywords
caesarean section, pregnancy, scar endometriosis.
Case Report
A 30 year old Para 5, living 3, dead 2
underwent lower section caesarean section 2
years back presented to gynecology out patient
department with complaints of pain in caesare-
an scar site from 1 year. The pain aggravated
during the menstrual periods. A firm and ten-
der swelling of dark brown color measuring
2×2 cm was found at the left edge of the cae-
sarean scar and was not fixed to the rectus
sheath.
Introduction
Endometriosis was first defined by Rokitansky
in 1860 as the presence and proliferation of the
endometrium outside the uterine cavity. It usu-
ally occurs in the pelvic sites such as ovaries,
posterior cul -de-sac, uterine ligaments, pelvic
peritoneum, bowel and rectovaginal septum.
Extrapelvic endometriosis can be found in unu-
sual places like nervous system, thorax, urinary
tract, gastrointestinal tract and in cutaneous
tissues.[1] Incisional endometriosis/ scar endo-
metriosis usually occurs in abdominal wall fol-
lowing surgeries especially early hysterectomy
and caesarean section (Fig 1). The incidence of
scar endometriosis following hysterectomy is
1.08-2.0% and after LSCS is 0.03 - 0.4%.[2] Its
occurrence on the perineum, after episiotomy
is still rare. Patients present with symptoms of
pain and swelling at the incision site which be-
come more prominent during menstrual peri-
ods.[3,4] It is often misdiagnosed as stitch granu-
loma, keloid, haematoma, or an abscess.
Fig 1. Caesarean Section scar
100
Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
J Clin Biomed Sci 2016; 6(3): 100-102
Incisional Endometriosis following Caesarean Section
Sonography revealed a well defined
hypo echoic lesion in the subcutaneous region
beneath the abdominal external scar. Mild vas-
cularity was noted on color Doppler. MRI re-
vealed an oval lesion mildly hyper intense to
muscle on T2 in the left lateral aspect of LSCS
scar. Focal thinning of anterior myometrium
was noted in mid segment of body of uterus
with a linear cleft extending from endometrial
cavity into myometrium (Fig 2).
A wide excision of the abdominal scar
was performed under spinal anaesthesia. The
excised scar was hard in consistency, reddish
brown in colour and highly vascular. Scar en-
dometriosis was confirmed by histopathologi-
cal examination (Fig 3). There was no recur-
rence of the symptoms up to six months of out
patient follow-up.
Discussion
Scar endometriosis on the abdominal
wall is most commonly seen following surger-
ies on the uterus and the fallopian tubes. The
endometrial tissue may be implanted in the
scars during the surgical procedures and may
proliferate on hormonal stimulation (cellular
transport theory). The other explanation is
that the neighborhood tissue may undergo
metaplasia which leads to scar endometriosis
(coelomic metaplasia theory).[5]
The endometrial tissue may also reach
the surgical scar through lymphatic and vascu-
lar routes. In a series of incisional endometrio-
sis after caesarean section studied over 30
years, the incidence was found to be 0.08%.
The average time from surgery to the clinical
presentation of endometriosis varied form 3
months to 12 years in different case series. [5]
Presence of cyclic pain in an incisional mass is
pathognomonic of scar endometriosis. MRI is
considered more sensitive and also specific
than sonography in the diagnosis of scar endo-
metriosis.[7]
The incidence of concomitant pelvic
endometriosis with scar endometriosis has
been reported to be from 14.3% to 26%. Ideal-
ly all patients must be examined for concomi-
tant pelvic endometriosis. [8] Histopathology is
confirmatory. Wide local excision is the pre-
ferred treatment. Lesions extending deep to
the muscles and fascia may require a synthetic
mesh replacement or a tissue transfer for clo-
sure after resection. Recently usage of leupro-
lide depot has been found to be beneficial.[6]
Fig 2. MRI image of the scar
Fig 3. Histopathology of the scar showing
endometriosis
101
Conclusion
Scar endometriosis is a rare condition.
It should be considered in the differential diag-
nosis in women presenting with painful symp-
toms with menstruation. The treatment of
choice is surgical resection of the endometrio-
sis with wide margins.
References
1. Khalifa Al - Jabri. Endometriosis at caesarean
section scar. Oman Med J.2009;24:294-95.
2. Goel P, Sood S. caesarean scar endometriosis .
JIMA, 2013; 7: 56-58.
3. Sudha. T, Anantha RP, Vani I, Subrahmanya SM.
Scar endometriosis - A clinical rarity. IAIM,
2015; 2: 147-51.
4. Zararia AN, Goverdhan NA, Patil RT. Post cae-
sarean scar endometriosis. JCR. 2015; 5: 401 -
05. Available from: http://
www.casereports.in/articles/5/2/Post-
Caesarean-Scar-Endometr iosis. html
5. Minaglia S, Mishell DR Jr, Ballard C A. Incisional
endometriosis after Cesarean section: A case
series. J Reprod Med. 2007; 52: 630–34.
6. Rivilin ME, Das SK, Patel RB, Meeks GR.
Leupride acetate in the management of cesare-
an scar endometriosis. Obstet & gynecol. 1995;
85: 838-39.
7. Jubanyik KJ, Committee F. Extrapelvic endome-
triosis. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of
north America. 1997; 24: 411- 40.
8. Gunes M, Kayikcioglu F, Ozturkoglu E, Haberal
A. Incisional endometriosis after cesarean sec-
tion, episiotomy and other gynecological proce-
dures. Journal of obstetrics and gynecology
research. 2005; 31: 471-75.
Incisional Endometriosis following Caesarean Section 102
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.