Abstract
21
Two hypermutated colon cancer cases with patient-derived cell lines, peripheral and tumor-infiltrating 22
T cells available were selected for detailed investigation of immunological response. 23
T cells co-cultured with autologous tumor cells showed only low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines 24
and failed at tumor recognition. Similarly, treatment of co-cultures with immune checkpoint inhibitors 25
(ICI) did not boost antitumor immune responses. Since proteinase inhibitor 9 (PI -9) was detected in 26
tumor cells, a specific inhibitor (PI-9i) was used in addition to ICI in T cell cytotoxicity testing. However, 27
only p re-stimulation with tumor -specific peptides (cryptic and neoantigenic) significantly increased 28
recognition and elimination of tumor cells by T cells independently of ICI or PI-9i. 29
We showed, that ICI resistant tumor cells can be targete d by tumor -primed T cells and also 30
demonstrated the superiority of tumor -naïve peripheral blood T cells compared to highly exhausted 31
tumor-infiltrating T cells. Future precision immunotherapeutic approaches should include multimodal 32
strategies to successfully induce durable anti-tumor immune responses. 33
34
1. Introduction 35
The interaction of tumor with immune cells triggers dynamic adaption to evade immunosurveillance. 36
A prominent example is tumors’ genetic or epigenetic modifications to reduce or switch-off HLA class 37
I expression, thus preventing detection by T cells. Depending on the tumor entity, up to 80% of solid 38
tumors have completely lost HLA class I expression 1. Another tool to repress antitumor immune 39
responses is the expression of immunomodulatory proteins like programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-40
1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) or 41
their respective ligands in the tumor microenvironment 2. Via these immune checkpoint molecules , 42
tumor cells utilize the physiologicall y programmed down -modulation of activated immune cells. 43
However, therapeutic interfering with these immunosuppressive mechanisms via immune checkpoint 44
inhibitors (ICI) represents the latest revolution in cancer treatment. 45
The application of ICI is mostly limited to tumors with high mutational burden (TMB), since clinical 46
trials proved highest response rates in this patient group (reviewed in 3). However, despite preselection 47
of patients, studies with microsatellite instable colorectal cancer (CRC) revealed , that up to 70% of 48
patients do not benefit from pembrolizumab 4, nivolumab 5 or durvalumab 6 treatment. Even though 49
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
3
combining ipilimumab and nivolumab raised patients’ objective response rates to 55% 7, still a 50
substantial number of hyper-mutated tumors resist ICI treatment. 51
High TMB and constitutive HLA class I expression are b oth favorable prognostic markers for 52
immunotherapy 8,9, but ICI therapy response prediction remains unsatisfactory. High TMB of ≥10 53
mutations/Mb is insufficient to predict ICI success, neither across cancer entities nor within a specific 54
one 10,11. However, the combination of TMB and loss of heterozygosity in HLA class I improved 55
differentiation between ICI therapy responders and non -responders in lung cancer 12,13. Similarly, a 56
score retrospectively determining tumor immunogenicity by TMB combined with antigen processing 57
machinery gene expression improved ICI therapy response prediction in urothelial cancer and 58
melanoma datasets 14. 59
T cells interaction with tumors can further be impaired by several other immunosuppressive 60
mechanisms beyond dysfunctional antigen presentat ion. Malignant cells often secrete immune 61
regulatory molecules, e.g. cytokines, which exert immunosuppressive effects in the tumor 62
microenvironment 15,16. Likewise, enzymes and enzyme inhibitors with a role in regulating immune cell 63
activity have been identified as complementary tumor immune evasion strategies 17,18. 64
Here, we selected two microsatellite instable CRC cases exhibiting constitutive HLA expression and 65
investigated the interaction of T cells with autologous tumor cells ex vivo. Co-culture of tumor cells 66
with autologous peripheral (pTc) or tumor-infiltrating T cells (TiTc) was applied to test the antitumor 67
effect of isolated T cells alone or in combination with immune modulatory agents matching tumor 68
cells’ characteristics. Moreover, effects of individualized inhibition of immunosuppress ion were 69
directly compared to anti -tumor immune responses of autologous T cells recognizing tumor-specific 70
antigenic peptides. 71
2. Results 72
2.1 Selection of tumor cases 73
For a detailed analysis of tumor and T cell interactions, appropriate patient biomaterials were selected 74
from our comprehensive set of CRC models available at the BioBank Rostock 19. 75
Considering all decisive factors (biomaterial availability, frequent non-synonymous mutations, antigen 76
processing, HLA class I expression and HLA class II inducibility), the two CRC cases HROC113 and 77
HROC285 were selected. Both tumors showed high TMB (HROC113: 176 mutations/Mb; HROC285: 212 78
mutations/Mb) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Tumor cell lines were established directly from the 79
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
4
patient’s tumor (HROC113) or from a patient-derived xenograft (HROC285 T0 M2). TiTc and pTc as well 80
as B-LCLs were also available for both patients. 81
82
2.2 T cells do not get activated by co-culture with autologous tumor cells 83
Co-culture experiments of T cells and autologous tumor cells were performed to investigate if the 84
tumors with high TMB and HLA expression can induce sufficient immune responses. Tumor cells were 85
incubated with T cells, which were pre -treated as follows: 1) expanded T cells, 2) T cells, which were 86
expanded and co-cultured with autologous tumor cells for 14 days and 3) T cells, which were expanded 87
and cultured for 14 days in the same conditions (temperature, media, supplements, change of media) 88
but without tumor cells (= control culture with tumor-naïve T cells). In the degranulation assay (Figure 89
1A), the amount of T cells recognizing tumor cells (CD8+/CD107a+/IFNγ+ cells) was larger in co-cultured 90
compared to unspecifically expanded pTc HROC113 (p=0.04) . Similarly, more degranulating T cells 91
were detected among tumor-naïve pTc HROC113 from the control culture than among unspecifically 92
expanded pTc HROC113 (p=0.02). There was no significant difference observed between the reactivity 93
of co-cultured and control-cultured pTc HROC113 (p>0.05; Figure 1A). The TiTc HROC113 showed a 94
similar pattern (Figure 1B) and corroborated the previous results (pco-culture vs expanded Tc=0.02; pcontrol-culture 95
vs expanded Tc=0.03; pco-culture vs control culture>0.05). In contrast, the population of tumor -reactive cells among 96
pTc HROC285 was similar in all three tested conditions (unspecific expansion, co -culture, control 97
culture) and no distinct differences were observed (Figure 1C). TiTc HROC285 were also assessed using 98
this experimental approach but unfortunately the proportion of CD8+ cells, being as low as 27% in the 99
beginning, even decreased further during the cultivation period and no reliable measurements of 100
CD8+/CD107a+/IFNγ+ cells could be obtained. 101
102
2.3 ICI do not increase the recognition of autologous tumor cells by T cells 103
Since tumor cells failed to induce T cell responses, ICI (pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), durvalumab (anti-104
PD-L1), and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4)) were added to the co-culture to improve anti-tumor reactions. 105
Contrasting expectations, pTc HROC113 recognized tumor cells better after control culture than after 106
ICI-supplemented co-culture, showing significantly deterioration after co-culture with PD-1 or CTLA-4 107
supplementation (p=0.048 and p=0.041, respectively) (Figure 1A). Moreover, the degranulation 108
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
5
capacity of co -cultured pTc HROC113 , with and without ICI treatment, was significantly lower 109
compared to tumor-naïve pTc HROC113 (p=0.004). 110
Due to the low quantity of available TiTc HROC113, single ICI testing was replaced by a combination 111
treatment (Figure 1B) but did also not improve tumor cell recognition . The results of pTc HROC285 112
(Figure 1C) resembled those of pTc HROC113: tumor-naïve pTc HROC285 showed high degranulation, 113
contrasting co-cultured pTc HROC285 with decreased tumor cell recognition. The addition of ICI was 114
insufficient to overcome the tumor cell-induced T cell inhibition. 115
116
2.4 HROC113 and HROC285 T0 M2 express genes of the antigen-processing 117
machinery 118
To investigate reasons for the failure of ICI treatment in vitro, we analyzed the expression of genes 119
involved in antigen processing and presentation. By determining the expression of 18 genes used in 120
the study of Wang et al 14, their immunological functionality was assessed in the established tumor cell 121
lines. Respective results were compared to datasets of normal colon and CRC samples from TCGA and 122
GTEX ( Colon: TCGA normal: n=51; TCGA tumor: n=484; GTEX normal: n=308). Surprisingly , when 123
compared to normal colon samples, gene expression was higher in both tumor cell lines as well as in 124
TMB high and TMB low tumor tissues regarding 16/18 genes investigated (Figure 2A-B). Only the 125
expression of β2 microglobulin (B2M) was found significantly lower in tumor tissues compared to 126
healthy colon samples in the analyzed data sets. When assessing differing genes between TMB high 127
and low CRC tissue samples, we observed, that the expression level of ERAP1, PDIA3, PSMB6, PSMB9, 128
PSMB10, CALR, CANX, TAP1, TAP2, TAPBP, B2M and HLA-C was found to be lower in tumors featuring 129
fewer mutations. In both tumor cell lines, t he mean expression of the selected genes resembled or 130
even exceeded the levels in CRC samples from TCGA, but due to the small size of the cell line cohort 131
(n=2), statistical analysis was inadmissible. Moreover, functional antigen processing was previous ly 132
assured through HLA ligandome analyses enabling the characterization of several thousand HLA 133
ligands for each CRC cell line, including tumor-specific antigens 20. 134
Flow-cytometry analyses showed that 98% of HROC113 and 96% of HROC285 T0 M2 cells stained 135
positive for HLA class I (Figure 3A). IFNγ pre-treatment increased the amount of HLA class I/II double 136
positive cells in HROC113 from <1% to 45% (p<0.001). In HROC285 T0 M2, the proportion of HLA class 137
I+/II+ cells even reached 72% following IFNγ treatment compared to 2% in untreated cells (p<0.001). 138
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
6
Accordingly, median fluorescence intensity of HLA class II increased by 20-fold after IFNγ stimulation 139
(p=0.002). Thus, IFNγ pre-treatment was performed for all the following experiments. 140
These results prove the integrity of antigen presentation in the selected tumor cell lines suggesting 141
functional immune interaction with autologous lymphocytes. Thus, the observed immunosuppression 142
by the tumor cells must be ascribed to other immune evasion mechanisms. 143
144
2.5 Tumor cells utilize several immunosuppressive mechanisms 145
Expression of the inhibitory checkpoint molecule programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was observed in 146
the majority of tumor cells (HROC113: 95%; HROC285 T0 M2: 79%; Figure 3B-C). Here, stimulation with 147
IFNγ increased median fluorescence intensity of PD-L1 expression about 4-fold in both tumor cell lines 148
(p=0.05 in both cases). When determining CD80/86 expression, this CTLA-4 ligand was detected on 149
30% and 17% of HROC113 and HROC285 T0 M2 cells, respectively (Figure 3D). Treatment with IFNγ did 150
not significantly change CD80/86 expression. 151
Further characterization of the tumor cells revealed granzyme B activity in HROC113 as well as 152
HROC285 T0 M2, which was found independent of IFNγ treatment (Figure S 1). As this apoptosis -153
propagating enzyme threatens cell survival, its presence is often accompanied by the expression of 154
proteinase inhibitor 9 (PI-9), which specifically inhibits the function of granzyme B. Indeed, at least 40% 155
of HROC113 as well as HROC285 T0 M2 tumor cells expressed this enzym e inhibitor (Figure 3E). This 156
finding seems to be common in CRC cells, since PI -9 expression was also observed in several other 157
patient-derived CRC cell lines in varying amounts and was independent of MSI (Figure S2). 158
The analysis of secreted cytokines showed that neither HROC113 nor HROC285 T0 M2 produced IL-10 159
in measurable amounts, which is known to impair T cell function. Additionally, the cytokine profile of 160
the tumor cell lines (Figure S 3) did not explain their immunosuppressive behavior in co -culture. 161
Fibrinogen-like protein 1 (Figure S4), an immunosuppressive ligand of LAG-3, was also not detectable 162
in tumor cell culture supernatants. 163
164
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
7
2.6 T cells characterization shows exhausted and regulatory subpopulations 165
Poor tumor cell recognition can be caused by an impaired ability for activation due to T cell exhaustion. 166
To assess the level of exhaustion in unspecifically expanded pTc and TiTc from patients HROC113 and 167
HROC285, expression levels of PD-1, CTLA-4 and LAG-3 were determined. LAG-3 (pTc HROC113: 82%; 168
pTc HROC285: 67%) and CTLA-4 (pTc HROC113: 68%; pTc HROC285: 51%) were found to be expressed 169
on the majority of pTc, while PD-1 was present on less than 20% of T cells (Figure 4A-B). Exhausted T 170
cells were classified as PD -1/CTLA-4/LAG-3 triple positive cells with 10% of pTc HROC113 and 9% of 171
pTc HROC285 identified as such, respectively. 172
The assessment of immune checkpoint molecules on TiTc (Figure 4C-D) revealed a larger quantity of 173
cells positive for PD -1 in TiTc of HROC113 and HROC285 compared to the respective matching pTc 174
(p=0.02). The large proportion of PD -1+ TiTc (60% in TiTc HROC113 as well as TiTc HROC285 ) was 175
accompanied by an overall enlarged population of exhausted cells in TiTc (p=0.05). 176
Even though, the amount of CD4+ cells was higher in TiTc than pTc (p<0.001), this did not coincide with 177
larger amount s of regulatory T cells (Figure 4E). In pTc HROC113, 5.2% of the cells were 178
CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+, while this population represented less than 1% of cells among the matching TiTc 179
(p=0.006). A contrasting observation was made in pTc and TiTc HROC285, where 3.2 and 7.7% of the 180
cells were identified as regulatory T cells, respectively. 181
The cytokine detect ion assay in T cell and co -cultures revealed secretion of the pro -inflammatory 182
interleukins (IL) -5, -6 and -17a as well as GM-CSF (Figure S3). It was frequently seen, that the cytokine 183
concentration was highest in T cell culture and decreased in the co-culture setting, while secretion by 184
tumor cells alone was minimal. 185
186
2.7 Peptide-stimulated T cells recognize autologous tumor cells better than co-187
cultured T cells 188
In a previous study, we showed that T cell stimulation with mutated neoantigens and non -mutated 189
cryptic peptides improved tumor cell recognition in pTc and TiTc 20. In the present study, we compared 190
the strength of T cell activation mediated by these tumor-specific peptides with T cell stimulation by 191
autologous tumor cells. pTc HROC113 and pTc HROC285 pre-stimulated with cryptic peptides reached 192
significantly higher amounts of degranulating cells compared to all respective co-culture approaches 193
(p<0.001 in both cases) (Figure 1A and C). A similar effect concerning improved tumor cell recognition 194
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
8
by neoantigen stimulation was observed in pTc HROC113, but high variance prevented reaching 195
significance. Additionally, these peptide stimulation experim ents showed that tumor -specific T cell 196
responses can be induced similarly in both pTc and TiTc, while tumor cell recognition by p Tc partly 197
even proved superior (ppTc HROC113 (cryptic peptides) vs TiTc HROC113 (cryptic peptides) =0.01). Furthermore, these results 198
demonstrate, that the tumor cells are indeed immunogenic and the missing T cell response in co -199
culture tests m ust be ascribed to remarkable immunosuppressive tumor cell properties . However, 200
since the combined ICI treatment could not improve tumor cell recognition by peptide -stimulated T 201
cells, we assume that for these two MSI CRC cases, immunosuppression does not only depend on PD-202
1, PD-L1 and CTLA4. 203
204
2.8 Peptide-stimulated pTc HROC113 eliminate autologous tumor cells 205
Since granzyme B activity measurement was unsuitable for detecting T cell-mediated tumor cell killing, 206
we set up an in vitro cytotoxicity assay based on crystal violet staining of adherent tumor cells. These 207
were stimulated with IFNγ and treated with ICI and/or a PI-9i, which had been proven to successfully 208
control tumor growth in mice by Jiang et al. 18. The effect of the PI-9i on tumor and T cell viability was 209
tested beforehand with concentrations covering 25-1,000µM (Figure S5). The highest concentration 210
not inducing cytotoxic effects, i.e. 400µM, was chosen for application in the cytotoxicity assay. 211
Cytotoxicity was experimentally tested as a proof of concept with peptide-stimulated pTc HROC113, 212
as they showed significantly better tumor cell recognition than co -cultured T cells . After 48h of 213
incubation with autologous tumor cells, the cytotoxic capacity of untreated control pTc HROC113 was 214
low (3% tumor cell killing) , and was not significantly improved by the addition of ICI, PI-9i or the 215
combination of both (Figure 5) . On the contrary, pTc HROC113 pre-stimulated with tumor -specific 216
cryptic peptides or neoantigens eliminated on average 78% (p<0.001) or 77% (p=0.006) of the tumor 217
cells, respectively. However, similarly to the findings with untreated control pTc HROC113, the addition 218
of the above-mentioned immune modulators did not result in increased tumor cell killing. Instead, the 219
combination of ICI and PI-9i even seemed to worsen the outcomes with all three T cell populations. 220
221
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
9
3. Discussion 222
In this study, we investigated the interaction of carefully selected tumor and autologous T cells in vitro. 223
In initial co-culture experiments, no anti-tumor responses were observed, which was due to the clinical 224
manifestation of the original tumors rather expected than surprising. Disappointingly, subsequent ICI 225
treatment to re-establish T cell activity and tumor cell recognition did not work out as expected. 226
Resistance against ICI is either an innate tumor cell property or is observed as an acquired 227
phenomenon after therapy. ICI resistance can be categorized into three groups: resistance 228
mechanisms related to (I) antigen recognition; (II) T cell migration/infiltration; and (III) effector 229
functions of T cells 21. When comparing gene expression of proteins involved in antigen processing 14 230
between our two tumor models and normal colon tissue, the majority of genes showed a higher 231
expression in tumor than in normal tissue; hinting at a preservation of functional antigen processing. 232
Even though B2M expression was decreased, a HLA ligandome analysis revealed thousands of HLA -233
eluted peptides in both cell lines 20. Thus, the presentation of tumor -specific peptides with the 234
potential to activate T cells was maintained in these two CRC cases, contrasting the well-established 235
correlation of MSI and diminished HLA expression 22–24. However, despite preserved functional tumor 236
antigen presentation, the interaction of the T cell receptor and peptide-presenting tumor cells can be 237
impaired, for example, by an overexpression of cell surface glycosphingolipids sterically impeding the 238
interaction 25. 239
Since antigen presentation was likely not defective and the selected co-culture in vitro assay neglected 240
the issue of T cell infiltration, the observed ICI resistance was probably caused by resistance 241
mechanisms related to T cell effector functions. When ICI were used to interfere with PD-1 and PD-L1, 242
which was expressed on the majority of tumor cells, there was no improvement in anti-tumor response 243
observed, even when these ICI where combined with anti-CTLA-4. The detailed characterization of the 244
T cell populations revealed the expression of a further immune checkpoint, namely LAG -3, on the 245
majority of T cells, possibly impairing their activation after binding to tumor cell MHC II. Currently, 246
several anti-LAG-3 antibodies are tested in pre -clinical and clinical trials 26. Moreover, as TIM -3 and 247
TIGIT also seem to negatively regulate T cell activity, blocking antibodies are similarly under 248
investigation 27 and further immune checkpoints are identified continuously 28. By focusing the 249
investigations on clinically approved ICI the results of the study may be limited, but they also prove 250
that further research is urgently needed. 251
The effector function of T cells is not only suppressed directly by tumor cells, but is mainly influenced 252
by the tumor microenvironment. Here, i mmunosuppressive cell populations and cytokines are 253
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
10
responsible for decreased T cell activity. The determination of regulatory T cell subsets in our selected 254
cancer cases did not indicate strong cell-based immune inhibition as these did not exceed 10%, which 255
equals to regulatory T cell levels in healthy individuals 29. Studies claiming increased proportions of 256
regulatory T cells in peripheral blood of tumor patients compared to healthy donors 30–32 could thus 257
not be validated in the CRC cases analyzed. Of note, T cells underwent two weeks of unspecific 258
expansion prior to measurements, potentially changing the composition of cell subpopulations. Likely, 259
persisting immune suppression by tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment resulted in lower anti-260
tumor reactivity of TiTc compared to pTc, characterized by a higher proportion of exhausted T cells or 261
an increased state of T cell exhaustion. Moreover, secretion of known immunosuppressive cytokines 262
like IL-10 could be excluded as driver of T cell inhibition. 263
Additional examinations revealed granzyme B activity in both tumor cell lines HROC113 and 264
HROC285 T0 M2, accompanied by the expression of its inhibito r PI -9. Granzyme B, which is 265
physiologically expressed in cytotoxic T and natural killer cells 33, was already detected previously in 266
breast, lung and urothelial carcinoma cells 34–36. Moreover, the expression of PI-9, the protective shield 267
against intracellular granzyme B, was found in prostate, lung and rectal cancer 37–39 and we could 268
confirm this finding here for a small series of low-passaged, patient-derived CRC cell lines. Since several 269
studies showed a negative correlation between PI -9 expression and response to ICI 40,41, we 270
hypothesized, that the use of PI-9i might restore anti-tumor immune responses. 271
However, the proof-of-concept cytotoxicity assay of pTc HROC113 and the tumor cell line HROC113 272
revealed, that neither ICI nor PI-9i treatment resulted in significant changes and even the combination 273
failed to improve tumor cell elimination. It is thus safe to conclude, that t umor c ells utilize d 274
immunosuppressive mechanisms beyond the investigated cytokine secretion, immune checkpoint 275
expression and adaption to cytotoxic microenvironment. Clinically, failure of ICI would have been 276
interpreted probably as a n immunological cold tumor, but T cell stimulations disproved this 277
assumption. When T cells were stimulated with tumor -specific peptides, recognition and elimination 278
of tumor cells increased significantly. Both, cryptic peptides as well as neoantigens, sufficiently induced 279
T cell effector function, clearly exceeding the effects of ICI and/or PI -9i. By comparing stimulated pTc 280
and TiTc we further showed, that T cells from peripheral blood are a valuable source of lymphocytes, 281
which can be turned into tumor -reactive T cells by stimulation with tumor -specific peptides. In 282
connection with studies showing that the quality 42 and clonality 43 of neoantigens was superior in 283
predicting T cell response in comparison to mere neoantigen number, these results hint at a likely 284
broader applicability of immunotherapy beyond tumors with high TMB. 285
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
11
Nevertheless, the incomplete elimination of tumor cells by peptide -stimulated T cells might again be 286
an indicator of a complex network of immunosuppressive mechanisms in use by the tumor cells, which 287
must be examined further. Our data also imply , that the development of new immune modulators 288
interfering with immunosuppressive molecules (immune checkpoint ligands, enzymes, cytokines, etc.) 289
and tumor -individual selection of those will contribute equally to optimally support the effector 290
function of tumor -reactive T cells. By applying ex vivo expanded and selected T cells or genetically 291
modified CAR T cells or TCR T cells, the strength of the anti-tumor reactions increases dramatically and 292
can overcome immunosuppressive barriers. Additionally, the combinati on of strongly primed T cells 293
with further immune modulators could prevent acquired resistance to immunotherapy and tumor 294
relapse as several studies already showed durable responses in combination therapy 44,45. 295
Summarizing all results, our detailed investigation of two distinct sets of patient -derived cell 296
populations demonstrated that ICI-resistant tumor cells can be targeted by T cells primed with tumor-297
specific antigens. This peptide stimulation induced increased tumor cell recognition not only in TiTc, 298
but also in pTc, which partially even exceeded the former. These findings in pTc could hint towards an 299
equivalent or even superior performance in future immunotherapeutic approaches. In our 300
investigation, extensive T cell priming in a personalized approach was superior to standardized ICI 301
therapy, underlining the importance of precision medicine also in cancer immunotherapy. Additionally, 302
this patient-individual approach could be combined with drugs like ICI and enzyme blockers according 303
to the respective tumor characteristics. Such multimodal approaches could then tackle the complex 304
network of immunosuppressive strategies to successfully overcome immunological barriers erected by 305
any given tumor. 306
4. Material and Methods 307
4.1 Cell Culture 308
Patient-derived CRC cell lines HROC113 and HROC285 T0 M2 from the HROC collection 19 were cultured 309
under standard conditions in DMEM/Ham´s F12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 2mM L -310
glutamine. For several experiments, tumor cells were treated for 48h with 200IU/ml I FNγ (Imukin, 311
Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). Cell culture reagents were obtained from PAN 312
Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany, unless stated otherwise. 313
314
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
12
4.2 T cell isolation and expansion 315
Isolation of p eripheral blood mononuclear cells and pTc from patients´ heparinized blood as well as 316
TiTc from vitally frozen tumor pieces was followed by a rapid Tc expansion protocol (REP) as described 317
recently 20. 318
319
4.3 Co-culture 320
Co-culture was conducted by adapting a previous protocol 46. Briefly, 20,000 IFNγ-treated tumor cells 321
were seeded with 200 ,000 T cells in a 24-well plate coated with anti-human CD28 (Immunotools, 322
Friesoythe, Germany) in DMEM/Ham´s F12 medium, 10% human AB serum, 2mM L -glutamine, 323
penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin (T cell medium) supplemented with 300IU/ml IL-2. Every 2-324
3 days, half of the medium was exchanged. At day seven, cells were harvested and seeded with freshly-325
prepared IFNγ-treated tumor cells in a ratio of 10:1. The co -culture ended at day 14 and c ells were 326
further analyzed. The medium of several experiments was supplemented with ICI (20µg/ml 327
Pembrolizumab (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany); 10µg/ml Ipilimumab (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York 328
City, NY, USA); or 20µg/ml Durvalumab (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK)). 329
330
4.4 T cell stimulation 331
Autologous B lymphoid cell lines (B -LCL) were used as antigen presenting cells. For peptide -loading, 332
3x106 B-LCL were incubated at 37°C with 10µg peptide pools in 1ml serum free medium for 1h. 333
Stimulations were performed in 24-well plates with irradiated (30Gy) peptide-loaded B-LCL added at a 334
ratio of 1:4 to 1x106 expanded Tc in 2ml of T cell medium supplemented with 1xITS solution IV and 335
300IU/ml IL-2 per well. After seven days of co-culture, Tc were harvested, counted and re-stimulated. 336
T cells stimulated with B-LCL without any peptide served as controls. 337
338
4.5 Flow cytometry 339
Tumor and T cells were collected and washed with phosphate -buffered saline (PBS). For extracellular 340
staining, cells were incubated in 100µl staining buffer (PBS, 200mM EDTA, 0.5% bovine serum albumin) 341
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
13
with the appropriate volume of antibody for 30min at 4°C protected from light. After centrifugation, 342
the staining solution was discarded and cells were washed again with staining buffer. Stained cells 343
were resuspended in staining buffer and measured promptly. Intracellular staining was performed 344
using the InsideStain Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and measured 345
promptly. The following anti -human antibodies were used from Im munotools: CD4-APC, CD8 -APC, 346
CD25-FITC, and FoxP3 -PE or Biol egend (San Diego, CA, USA): CD107a-FITC, CD152-PE, CD223-APC, 347
CD274-FITC, and CD279-FITC. Samples were measured using a BD FACSCalibur™ and data was analyzed 348
by using FCSalyzer 0.9.21 alpha (Sven Mostböck, Vienna, Austria; 349
https://sourceforge.net/projects/fcsalyzer/). 350
351
4.6 Degranulation assay 352
The ability of T cells to recognize tumor cells was tested in the degranulation assay 46. A 96-well plate 353
was coated with anti-human CD28 (Immunotools) and 100,000 IFNγ-treated tumor cells were seeded 354
together with 200 ,000 pTc or TiTc per well in Tc medium containing anti -human CD107a -FITC 355
(Biolegend). After 1h incubation, 1µg/ml Brefeldin A (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) 356
was added, followed by another 4h incubation. Intracellular flow cytometry staining was conducted as 357
described using CD8-APC (Immunotools) and IFNγ-PE (Biolegend). Samples were measured with gates 358
adjusted to detect CD8+/CD107a+/IFNγ+ cells. To receive values for relative degranulation, percentage 359
of triple-positive Tc was normalized to the triple -positive population in Tc not incubated with tumor 360
cells. 361
362
4.7 Cytokine detection and FGL1 ELISA 363
For cytokine detection, supernatants were collected from Tc, tumor cells and co-cultures, all cultured 364
for seven days without medium exchange. The concentrations of granulocyte-macrophage colony-365
stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IFNα, IFN γ, lL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, and tumor 366
necrosis factor (TNF) were determined by MACSPlex Cytokine 12 Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Supernatants of 367
tumor cell lines were also used for the measurement of FGL -1 with the Human FGL1/Fibrinogen Like 368
Protein 1 ELISA Kit (Assay Genie, Dublin, Ireland). 369
370
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
14
4.8 GranToxiLux 371
The GranToxiLux assay was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Oncoimmunin Inc, 372
Gaithersburg, MD, USA). 373
374
4.9 Cytotoxicity assay 375
Tumor cells were seeded into a 48 well plate and stimulated with 200IU/ml IFNγ for 48h. 376
Simultaneously, respective wells were treated with 400µM PI -9i (1,3-Benzoxazole-6-carboxylic acid, 377
Advanced ChemBlocks Inc, Hayward, CA, USA). Following pre-treatment, 5x105 peptide-stimulated or 378
control Tc were added to the approximately 1x105 tumor cells in each well. The number of tumor cells 379
was estimated using previously determined doubling times. The co-culture medium was supplemented 380
with ICI (20µg/ml Pembrolizumab; 10µg/ml Ipilimumab; 20µg/ml Durvalumab) and/or PI -9i (400µM). 381
After 48h of co-culture, medium was discarded, wells were washed once with PBS before 200µl of 0.2% 382
crystal violet solution was added. After 20min incubation at room temperature, staining solution was 383
discarded and wells were washed three times with PBS. When plates were dry, 500µl of sodium 384
dodecyl sulfate solution was added and optical density at 570nm was measu red at the microplate 385
reader Infinite 200 (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). 386
4.10 RNA expression analysis 387
RNA sequencing of the patient-derived cell lines was performed by the Center for Quantitative Biology 388
(QBiC, University of Tübingen, Germany) and resulting data was provided. Moreover, publicly available 389
data was used for comparison. First, R package (R (4.2.1) version) was applied to The Cancer Genome 390
Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 20 .06.2022)) and the Genotype -Tissue 391
Expression (GTEx, gtexportal.org/home/ (accessed on 20.06.2022)) databases to analyze the difference 392
of the mRNA levels of 18 genes of interest including ERAP1 [ENSG00000164307.12], ERAP2 393
[ENSG00000164308.16], PDIA3 [ENSG00000167004.12], PSMB5 [ENSG00000100804.18] , PSMB6 394
[ENSG0000142507.9], PSMB 7 [ENSG00000136930.12], PSMB8 [ENSG00000204264.8], PSMB9 395
[ENSSG00000240065.7], PSMB10 [ENSG00000205220.11], B2M [ENSG00000166710.17] , CALR 396
[ENSG00000179218.13], CANX [ENSG00000127022.14], TAP1 [ENSG00000168394.10], TAP2 397
[ENSG00000204267.13], TAPBP [ENSSG00000231925.11], HLA -A [ENSG00000206503.11], HLA -B 398
[ENSG00000234745.9] and HLA-C [ENSG00000204525.14]. Gene expression was compared between 399
484 CRC and 359 normal colorectal mucosal tissue samples. Moreover, TMB was used to grou p the 400
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
15
cancer samples: Samples were sorted by TMB and top 20% were identified as TMB high. Remaining 401
samples were considered TMB low. 402
4.11 Statistical analyses 403
Statistical significance was determined by a n unpaired, two -sided t-test using GraphPad Prism 5 404
(Boston, MA, USA). Results were stated significant if the t-test resulted in p value <0. 05. Details on 405
compared groups are given in the figure legends. If not stated otherwise, graphs depicting the results 406
show mean values and the respective standard deviation. 407
408
Ethics approval and consent to participate 409
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave 410
informed written consent to participate in the study and all procedures were approved by the Ethics 411
Committee of the University of Rostock University Medical Center (Reference numbers: A 2018-0054 412
and A 2019-0187) in accordance with generally accepted guidelines for the use of human material. 413
414
References
436
1. Campoli, M. & Ferrone, S. HLA antigen changes in malignant cells: epigenetic mechanisms and 437
biologic significance. Oncogene 27, 5869–5885; 10.1038/onc.2008.273 (2008). 438
2. Moon, J., Oh, Y. M. & Ha, S.-J. Perspectives on immune checkpoint ligands: expression, 439
regulation, and clinical implications. BMB reports 54, 403–412; 10.5483/BMBRep.2021.54.8.054 440
(2021). 441
3. Klempner, S. J. et al. Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker for Response to 442
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Current Evidence. The Oncologist 25, e147-e159; 443
10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0244 (2020). 444
4. Le, D. T. et al. PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. The New England 445
journal of medicine 372, 2509–2520; 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596 (2015). 446
5. Overman, M. J. et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or 447
microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, 448
phase 2 study. The Lancet. Oncology 18, 1182–1191; 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30422-9 (2017). 449
6. Oh, C. R. et al. Phase II study of durvalumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated 450
microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient or POLE-mutated metastatic or 451
unresectable colorectal cancer. International journal of cancer 150, 2038–2045; 452
10.1002/ijc.33966 (2022). 453
7. Overman, M. J. et al. Durable Clinical Benefit With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in DNA Mismatch 454
Repair-Deficient/Microsatellite Instability-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Journal of clinical 455
oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 36, 773–779; 456
10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9901 (2018). 457
8. Ganesh, K. et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: rationale, challenges and potential. Nat 458
Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16, 361–375; 10.1038/s41575-019-0126-x (2019). 459
9. Aptsiauri, N. & Garrido, F. The Challenges of HLA Class I Loss in Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts 460
and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res 28, 5021–5029; 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3501 (2022). 461
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
17
10. Li, Y. et al. Tumor Mutational Burden Predicting the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in 462
Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Immunol. 12, 751407; 463
10.3389/fimmu.2021.751407 (2021). 464
11. Strickler, J. H., Hanks, B. A. & Khasraw, M. Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictor of 465
Immunotherapy Response: Is More Always Better? Clin Cancer Res 27, 1236–1241; 466
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3054 (2021). 467
12. Zhang, X. et al. Integrated investigation of the prognostic role of HLA LOH in advanced lung 468
cancer patients with immunotherapy. Front. Genet. 13, 1066636; 10.3389/fgene.2022.1066636 469
(2022). 470
13. Shim, J. H. et al. HLA-corrected tumor mutation burden and homologous recombination 471
deficiency for the prediction of response to PD-(L)1 blockade in advanced non-small-cell lung 472
cancer patients. Annals of Oncology 31, 902–911; 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.004 (2020). 473
14. Wang, S., He, Z., Wang, X., Li, H. & Liu, X.-S. Antigen presentation and tumor immunogenicity in 474
cancer immunotherapy response prediction. eLife 8; 10.7554/eLife.49020 (2019). 475
15. Kim, R., Emi, M., Tanabe, K. & Arihiro, K. Tumor-driven evolution of immunosuppressive 476
networks during malignant progression. Cancer Res 66, 5527–5536; 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-477
05-4128 (2006). 478
16. Burkholder, B. et al. Tumor-induced perturbations of cytokines and immune cell networks. 479
Biochimica et biophysica acta 1845, 182–201; 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.01.004 (2014). 480
17. Zhai, L. et al. Immunosuppressive IDO in Cancer: Mechanisms of Action, Animal Models, and 481
Targeting Strategies. Front. Immunol. 11, 1185; 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01185 (2020). 482
18. Jiang, L. et al. Direct Tumor Killing and Immunotherapy through Anti-SerpinB9 Therapy. Cell 183, 483
1219-1233.e18; 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.045 (2020). 484
19. Mullins, C. S. et al. Integrated Biobanking and Tumor Model Establishment of Human Colorectal 485
Carcinoma Provides Excellent Tools for Preclinical Research. Cancers 11; 486
10.3390/cancers11101520 (2019). 487
20. Schwarz, S. et al. T cells of colorectal cancer patients' stimulated by neoantigenic and cryptic 488
peptides better recognize autologous tumor cells. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 10; 489
10.1136/jitc-2022-005651 (2022). 490
21. Nagasaki, J., Ishino, T. & Togashi, Y. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. 491
Cancer science 113, 3303–3312; 10.1111/cas.15497 (2022). 492
22. Bicknell, D. C., Kaklamanis, L., Hampson, R., Bodmer, W. F. & Karran, P. Selection for beta 2-493
microglobulin mutation in mismatch repair-defective colorectal carcinomas. Current biology : CB 494
6, 1695–1697; 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70795-1 (1996). 495
23. Kloor, M. et al. Immunoselective pressure and human leukocyte antigen class I antigen 496
machinery defects in microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers. Cancer Res 65, 6418–6424; 497
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0044 (2005). 498
24. Kloor, M. et al. Beta2-microglobulin mutations in microsatellite unstable colorectal tumors. 499
International journal of cancer 121, 454–458; 10.1002/ijc.22691 (2007). 500
25. Jongsma, M. L. M. et al. The SPPL3-Defined Glycosphingolipid Repertoire Orchestrates HLA Class 501
I-Mediated Immune Responses. Immunity 54, 132-150.e9; 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.003 502
(2021). 503
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
18
26. Sauer, N. et al. LAG-3 as a Potent Target for Novel Anticancer Therapies of a Wide Range of 504
Tumors. International journal of molecular sciences 23; 10.3390/ijms23179958 (2022). 505
27. Cai, L., Li, Y., Tan, J., Xu, L. & Li, Y. Targeting LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy. 506
J Hematol Oncol 16, 101; 10.1186/s13045-023-01499-1 (2023). 507
28. Wang, Y. et al. Immune checkpoint modulators in cancer immunotherapy: recent advances and 508
emerging concepts. J Hematol Oncol 15, 111; 10.1186/s13045-022-01325-0 (2022). 509
29. Taams, L. S. et al. Regulatory T cells in human disease and their potential for therapeutic 510
manipulation. Immunology 118, 1–9; 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02348.x (2006). 511
30. Liyanage, U. K. et al. Prevalence of regulatory T cells is increased in peripheral blood and tumor 512
microenvironment of patients with pancreas or breast adenocarcinoma. Journal of immunology 513
(Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 169, 2756–2761; 10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2756 (2002). 514
31. Ormandy, L. A. et al. Increased populations of regulatory T cells in peripheral blood of patients 515
with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer research 65, 2457–2464; 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-516
3232 (2005). 517
32. Wolf, A. M. et al. Increase of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. Clinical 518
cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 9, 606–612 519
(2003). 520
33. Cullen, S. P., Brunet, M. & Martin, S. J. Granzymes in cancer and immunity. Cell Death Differ 17, 521
616–623; 10.1038/cdd.2009.206 (2010). 522
34. D'Eliseo, D. et al. Granzyme B is expressed in urothelial carcinoma and promotes cancer cell 523
invasion. International journal of cancer 127, 1283–1294; 10.1002/ijc.25135 (2010). 524
35. Hu, S. X. et al. Expression of endogenous granzyme B in a subset of human primary breast 525
carcinomas. British journal of cancer 89, 135–139; 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601051 (2003). 526
36. Kontani, K. et al. Involvement of granzyme B and perforin in suppressing nodal metastasis of 527
cancer cells in breast and lung cancers. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the 528
European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 27, 180–529
186; 10.1053/ejso.2000.1060 (2001). 530
37. Ray, M., Hostetter, D. R., Loeb, C. R. K., Simko, J. & Craik, C. S. Inhibition of Granzyme B by PI-9 531
protects prostate cancer cells from apoptosis. The Prostate 72, 846–855; 10.1002/pros.21486 532
(2012). 533
38. Repetto, O. et al. Identification of protein clusters predictive of tumor response in rectal cancer 534
patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Oncotarget 8, 28328–28341; 535
10.18632/oncotarget.16053 (2017). 536
39. Soriano, C. et al. Increased proteinase inhibitor-9 (PI-9) and reduced granzyme B in lung cancer: 537
mechanism for immune evasion? Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 77, 38–45; 538
10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.01.017 (2012). 539
40. Jiang, P. et al. Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy 540
response. Nat Med 24, 1550–1558; 10.1038/s41591-018-0136-1 (2018). 541
41. Ibáñez-Molero, S. et al. SERPINB9 is commonly amplified and high expression in cancer cells 542
correlates with poor immune checkpoint blockade response. Oncoimmunology 11, 2139074; 543
10.1080/2162402X.2022.2139074 (2022). 544
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
19
42. Balachandran, V. P. et al. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of 545
pancreatic cancer. Nature 551, 512–516; 10.1038/nature24462 (2017). 546
43. McGranahan, N. et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to 547
immune checkpoint blockade. Science (New York, N.Y.) 351, 1463–1469; 548
10.1126/science.aaf1490 (2016). 549
44. Wilgenhof, S. et al. Phase II Study of Autologous Monocyte-Derived mRNA Electroporated 550
Dendritic Cells (TriMixDC-MEL) Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Pretreated Advanced 551
Melanoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical 552
Oncology 34, 1330–1338; 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4121 (2016). 553
45. Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z.-Y. & Liu, J.-Y. Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Alone 554
or in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 555
10, 1184; 10.3389/fphar.2019.01184 (2019). 556
46. Cattaneo, C. M. et al. Tumor organoid-T-cell coculture systems. Nature protocols 15, 15–39; 557
10.1038/s41596-019-0232-9 (2020). 558
559
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
20
Figures 560
561
Figure 1: Effect of co-culture, ICI treatment and peptide stimulation on tumor cell recognition by Tc. 562
(A) pTc HROC113, (B) TiTc HROC113 and (C) pTc HROC285 underwent different (co-)culture conditions 563
or were stimulated with tumor -specific peptides to increase their anti tumor reactivity measured by 564
degranulation assay after 5h incubation with freshly prepared tumor cells. CD8 +/CD107a+/IFNγ+ cells 565
were considered tumor -reactive. Results were normalized to measurements of control Tc not 566
incubated with tumor cells. p<0.05 in t-test of sample vs. expanded T cell (*), control culture (#) or co-567
culture (&). Depicted are means of 2-6 biological replicates and the respective standard deviation. 568
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
21
569
Figure 2: Expression of genes involved in antigen processing. TCGA data of CRC (n=484) were 570
compared with normal colon tissue (TCGA: n=51, GTEX: n= 308) and tumor cell lines (n=2) , regarding 571
expression of 18 genes involved in antigen processing and presentation. Tumor cell line data contained 572
three technical replicates each, but due to the small group size, statistical calculations were omitted. 573
(A) Heatmap of analyzed data sets depicting high expression in blue and low expression in red, in regard 574
to TMB. (B) Expression of antigen processing genes ; t-test of tumor sample vs. normal tissue with 575
p<0.05 (*), p<0.01 (**) and p<0.001 (***); t-test of TMB high vs. TMB low with p<0.05 (#), p<0.01 (##) 576
and p<0.001 (###). 577
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
22
578
Figure 3: Tumor cell characterization. Untreated or IFNγ-treated (200IU/ml for 48h) tumor cells were 579
analyzed via flow cytometry. (A) shows PD-L1 positive cells. (B) Median fluorescence intensity was 580
determined and fold change in IFNγ-treated and untreated tumor cells was calculated. (C) Percentage 581
of HLA class I+ and II +, (D) CD80 +/86+ and (E) PI-9+ were determined. Depicted are means of 3-5 582
biological replicates and the respective standard deviation. 583
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
23
584
Figure 4: Characterization of T cells. Following 14 d ays of unspecific expansion, Tc were analyzed 585
regarding (A-D) exhaustion markers and (E) proportion of regulatory Tc defined as CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+. 586
Depicted are means of 3-4 biological replicates and the respective standard deviation. 587
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint
Interactions of T cells and autologous colon cancer cells
24
588
Figure 5: Cytotoxicity of pTc HROC113. Tumor cells were incubated for 48h with pTc HROC113, which 589
were pre-stimulated for 14 d ays with tumor-specific cryptic or neoantigen ic peptides. pTc HROC113 590
stimulated without peptide served as control. Medium was supplemented with three ICI (20µg/ml 591
pembrolizumab, 10µg/ml ipilimumab and 20µg/ml durvalumab) and/or 400µmol PI-9i. (*) p<0.05 in t-592
test of sample and unstimulated control without immune modulators. Depicted are two biologically 593
independent measurements, mean and standard deviation. 594
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted February 8, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.06.579061doi: bioRxiv preprint