Possible ways to correct severe forms of climacteric syndrome in women with endometriosis

In: HEALTH OF WOMAN · 2018 · pp. 96–101 · doi:10.15574/hw.2018.132.96 · W3167231228
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study compared Estrogel monotherapy with a combination of Estrogel, phenibut, and mebicar for severe climacteric syndrome in women with endometriosis, finding the combination more effective in symptom reduction.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

The paper evaluated the effectiveness of a complex medical therapy to correct severe climacteric syndrome (CS) in 60 women with endometriosis over 3 months, randomized into two groups. Group 1 received transdermal estrogen (Estrogel) plus an intrauterine levonorgestrel system, while group 2 received estrogen along with anti-stress medications phenibut and mebicar plus the same levonorgestrel intrauterine system; clinical change was tracked over time using an integral pathology index (IPI) and an improvement degree measure. Both approaches improved CS-related scores, but combination anti-stress therapy with estrogen produced nearly twice the effectiveness over the first two months compared with estrogen-based therapy alone, with reported faster symptom elimination and near-full reduction of psychoemotional disorder severity. The study’s main limitation is that the abstract does not describe key methodological details (e.g., blinding, specific outcome thresholds, or adverse effects), and results are presented primarily in comparative coefficient terms rather than full clinical endpoints. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it tests anti-stress medication combinations added to menopausal hormone therapy in women with endometriosis who have severe climacteric syndrome.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Modern demographic changes in society are accompanied by an increase of women of the older age group in the general population. During this age period, along with the elimination of reproductive function in women, a complex of pathological symptoms often develops – climacteric syndrome (CS), which displays the maladaptation of various organs and systems that have estrogen receptors. An extremely topical problem of climacteric syndrome is for patients with endometriosis whose quantity is about 50% of the population. The objective: the determination of the effectiveness of the complex of medical therapy developed by us in women with severe forms of COP in the context of endometriosis. Materials and methods. Within 3 months we actively observed 60 women with an endometriosis in the anamnesis and manifestations of severe CS. By randomization, the women were divided into 2 groups depending on the chosen therapy: group 1 consisted of 30 women who, taking into account the above mentioned advantages, received the transdermal estrogen Estrogel, group 2 – 30 patients, whom a therapy by estrogen, phenibut and mebicar was assigned. Patients of both groups were given an intrauterine system with levonorgestrel. In order to conduct a comparative assessment of the clinical effectiveness of various treatment methods, the integral pathology index (IPI) was used in dynamics – before treatment, after 1, 2 and 3 months of therapy. The improvement degree (ID) of the disease clinical picture was also determined. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out on a personal computer using the programs SPSS 2000 (SPSSInc., USA) and Exel 2000 (MicrosoftInc., USA). Results. Our analysis found that as a result of the therapy received, a significant improvement in the scores was observed among patients of both subgroups. During the first two months, the effectiveness of combining menopausal hormone therapy with anti-stress medications in women with severe CS was almost 2 times greater than monotherapy with menopausal hormone therapy (Coefficient of Efficacy 1 = 2.68, Coefficient of Efficacy 2 = 1.62), indicating a faster elimination rate of CS’ symptoms using this combination. The overall effectiveness of the combination of phenybut with mebikar against the background of the use of Estrogel with an intrauterine system with levonorgestrel was 1.41 times higher compared to effectiveness of Estrogel and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system only use. Conclusion. Administration of anti-stress drugs Fenibut&Mebikar combination along with use of menopausal hormone therapy allows to reduce quickly the severity of CS manifestations, especially psychoemotional disorders almost to their full elimination in a relatively short period of time. The proposed scheme of treatment helps to eliminate quickly the symptoms of menopausal syndrome in women with endometriosis, improve and stabilize their psychological profile, restore working capacity, improve adaptation and quality of life. Key words: climacteric syndrome, endometriosis, anti-stress therapy, phenibut, mebicar, transdermal estrogen, Estrogel, intrauterine system with levonorgestrel.
Full text 6,308 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Materials

and methods. Within 3 months we actively observed 60 women with an endometriosis in the anamnesis and manifestations of severe CS. By randomization, the women were divided into 2 groups depending on the chosen therapy: group 1 consisted of 30 women who, taking into account the above mentioned advantages, received the transdermal estrogen Estrogel, group 2 – 30 patients, whom a therapy by estrogen, phenibut and mebicar was assigned. Patients of both groups were given an intrauterine system with levonorgestrel. In order to conduct a comparative assessment of the clinical effectiveness of various treatment methods, the integral pathology index (IPI) was used in dynamics – before treatment, after 1, 2 and 3 months of therapy. The improvement degree (ID) of the disease clinical picture was also determined. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out on a personal computer using the programs SPSS 2000 (SPSSInc., USA) and Exel 2000 (MicrosoftInc., USA). Results. Our analysis found that as a result of the therapy received, a significant improvement in the scores was observed among patients of both subgroups. During the first two months, the effectiveness of combining menopausal hormone therapy with anti-stress medications in women with severe CS was almost 2 times greater than monotherapy with menopausal hormone therapy (Coefficient of Efficacy 1 = 2.68, Coefficient of Efficacy 2 = 1.62), indicating a faster elimination rate of CS’ symptoms using this combination. The overall effectiveness of the combination of phenybut with mebikar against the background of the use of Estrogel with an intrauterine system with levonorgestrel was 1.41 times higher compared to effectiveness of Estrogel and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system only use. Conclusion. Administration of anti-stress drugs Fenibut&Mebikar combination along with use of menopausal hormone therapy allows to reduce quickly the severity of CS manifestations, especially psychoemotional disorders almost to their full elimination in a relatively short period of time. The proposed scheme of treatment helps to eliminate quickly the symptoms of menopausal syndrome in women with endometriosis, improve and stabilize their psychological profile, restore working capacity, improve adaptation and quality of life. Key words: climacteric syndrome, endometriosis, anti-stress therapy, phenibut, mebicar, transdermal estrogen, Estrogel, intrauterine system with levonorgestrel.

References

1. Burchynskyi SG. 2003. Nootropics as pharmacopreventive means: new strategies, new opportunities. Practitioners Journal 1:63-66. 2. Vovk IB, Kondratiuk VK, Chubey GV, Zakharenko NF. 2009. Treatment of genital endometriosis from evolution to revolution (literature review). Women’s Health 4:40-43. 3. Zakharenko NF, Kovalenko NV, Manolyak IP. 2018. Violation of the detoxification system in the genesis of endometriosis. Possible ways of correction. Odessa medical journal 2(166):55-59. 4. Zakharenko NF, Kovbasiy VP, Kovalenko NV. 2010. Characteristics of psychological personality types in benign hyperproliferative diseases of the female reproductive system. Women's Health 2(48):133-136. 5. Zaharenko NF. 2010. Clinical and anamnestic characteristics of women with different forms of endometriosis. Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology: Sciences. Pract. journ. 72;5:97-104. 6. Zanko OV, Bolgova LV, Kovalenko NV, Tatarchuk TF, Yarotska NV. 2017. The role of endothelial dysfunction in the genesis of clinical manifestations of climacteric syndrome in women with peri menopause. Reproductive endocrinology 5(37):58-647. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2017.37.58-64 7. Ilovaiskaya IA. 2015. Termination of menstrual function in reproductive age and premature aging. Gynecology-endocrinology 1(102):52-54. 8. Tatarchuk TF, Zakharenko NF, Manolyak IP, Kovbasiy VP. 2014. Improving medical tactics in women with endometriosis. Reproductive Endocrinology 4(18):24-27. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2014.18.24-27 9. Tatarchuk TF, Zakharenko NF, Manolyak IP, Kovalenko NV, Kovbasiy VP. 2014. Features of climacteric syndrome in women with endometriosis and possible ways of its correction. Scientific journal of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine 2:71-7. 10. Tatarchuk TF. 2006. Stress and women’s reproductive function. International Journal of Endocrinology 3(5):2-9. 11. Tatarchuk TF, Efimenko OA, Tutchenko TN. 2007. Stress and involution of women’s reproductive system. Reproductive Health of women 5(34):153-156. 12. Yureneva SV, Ermakova EI. 2017. Menopausal disorders in women: pathogenesis, clinic, diagnosis, treatment, prevention. MedicaMente. 3;2:32-38. 13. Inceboz U. 2015. Endometrios is after menopause womens. Health (Lond). 11(5):711-715. 14. Blümel JE, Lavín P, Vallejo MS, Sarrá S. 2014. Menopause or climacteric, just a semantic discussion or has it clinical implications? Climacteric. 17(3):235-241. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2013.838948; PMid:23998690 15. Gemmell LC, Webster KE, Kirtley S et all. 2017. The management of menopause in women with a his endometriosis: a systematic review. HumanReproductionUpdate. 23;4:481–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx011; PMid:28498913 PMCid:PMC5850813

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK