Ultrasound Evaluation of Myometrium

In: Ultrasound in Gynecology · 2017 · pp. 55–95 · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2714-7_3 · W2582572165
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This chapter details standardized ultrasound evaluation of the myometrium and its pathologies, including fibroids, adenomyosis, and sarcoma, based on the MUSA consensus.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This chapter reviews uterine myometrium ultrasound, emphasizing standardized evaluation and reporting of myometrial pathology using the MUSA consensus framework, including unified terminology, definitions, and methodology. It also describes the appearance of normal uterus and myometrium across age groups and provides detailed coverage of myometrial pathologies such as fibroids, adenomyosis, adenomyoma, and sarcoma, illustrated with numerous composite sonographic images. A stated limitation is that the chapter’s primary focus is on standardized imaging assessment and features rather than presenting new patient-level diagnostic performance data. Relevance to endometriosis: the chapter includes adenomyosis among myometrial pathologies (and endo-related keywords like “deep infiltrate endometriosis” appear in the machine-added index), though the chapter’s main topic is ultrasound evaluation of the myometrium rather than endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 3,711 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the uterine myometrium. The first part of the chapter deals with the systematic and standardised evaluation and reporting of myometrial pathology primarily based on the recent MUSA consensus statement. Standardising terminologies, definitions and methodology of evaluation is important so that sonologists worldwide speak the same language. This helps us not only in understanding pathology better but is also conducive in combining efforts for comparison of data and research. The next part of the chapter deals with normal uterus and myometrium, as seen in woman of different age groups. This is followed by various pathologies of the myometrium which are dealt with in detail. They include fibroids, adenomyosis, adenomyoma and sarcoma. There are over 48 composite images in this chapter highlighting various sonographic features in these pathologies. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others Suggested Reading Bosch VD et al (2015) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(3):284–298 Covarrubias DA et al (2009) Multimodality imaging findings of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:247–249. doi:10.1002/uog.6293 Exacoustos C et al (2011) Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:471–479. doi:10.1002/uog.8900 Garel L et al (2001) US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics 21(6):1393–1407 Giunchi S (2010) OC27.05: uterine sarcomas: clinical and sonographic characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:50. doi:10.1002/uog.7920 Kepkep K et al (2007) Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:341–345. doi:10.1002/uog.3985 Kishi Y et al (2012) Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(2):114–117 Kurjak A, Žalud I (1991) The characterization of uterine tumors by transvaginal color Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1:50–52. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01010050 Leone FPG et al (2007) Sonohysterography in the preoperative grading of submucous myomas: considerations on three-dimensional methodology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:717–718. doi:10.1002/uog.4043 Murase E et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 5:1179–1197 Reinhold C (1999) Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics: 19: suppl 1, S147–S160 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. About this chapter Cite this chapter Sibal, M. (2017). Ultrasound Evaluation of Myometrium. In: Ultrasound in Gynecology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2714-7_3 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2714-7_3 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2713-0 Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2714-7 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Keywords

- Uterine Fibroid - Uterine Sarcoma - Endometrial Cavity - Uterine Fibroid Embolisation - Deep Infiltrate Endometriosis These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (11)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK