Economic Burden of Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis quantified the substantial economic burden of endometriosis, reporting average annual costs per woman ranging from EUR 8,768 to Int $16,970-$20,898 across different countries.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the economic burden of endometriosis using English-language full-text studies published between January 2013 and January 2024, identified from PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley Library, and ScienceDirect; 14 studies were included out of 951 identified. Across studies, the authors synthesized evidence on both direct healthcare costs and productivity losses, finding that the annual economic burden per woman is substantial, with reported averages ranging from EUR 8,768 in Sweden to Int $16,970–$20,898 in Australia. The review also reported comparative cost-effectiveness results, including non-surgical treatments in the USA being more cost-effective than surgery (about $100,000 per QALY) and LNG-IUS in the UK being the most expensive treatment (£650.94), alongside additional country-specific cost ranges and ICERs. The main limitation stated is that conclusions rely on a limited number of included studies (14). This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically quantifies the condition’s direct healthcare costs and productivity losses and synthesizes related cost-effectiveness findings.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,847 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Keywords
Introduction
Material and methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (3)
Cited by (3)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00