Massively parallel evolution reveals a biophysical scaling law between cell size and internal cell density

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Using a massively parallel evolution platform, we selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae for increased cell size to test how cellular architecture adapts to biophysical constraints. As cells evolved larger size, they became less spherical and showed reduced carrying capacity without changes in maximum growth rate. Optical diffraction tomography revealed that individual cells with greater volume consistently exhibited lower internal density, a relationship that persisted across replicate populations and evolved isolates. The largest cells often contained enlarged vacuoles, suggesting that vacuole expansion may sometimes contribute to reduced density. Extending this analysis beyond yeast, 68 species spanning major phylogenetic clades also demonstrate a negative scaling between cell density and cell size. Together, these results suggest that decreased internal density is a conserved consequence of increasing cell size, revealing a fundamental cellular trade-off between volume expansion and material concentration.
Full text 1,137 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Using a massively parallel evolution platform, we selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae for increased cell size to test how cellular architecture adapts to biophysical constraints. As cells evolved larger size, they became less spherical and showed reduced carrying capacity without changes in maximum growth rate. Optical diffraction tomography revealed that individual cells with greater volume consistently exhibited lower internal density, a relationship that persisted across replicate populations and evolved isolates. The largest cells often contained enlarged vacuoles, suggesting that vacuole expansion may sometimes contribute to reduced density. Extending this analysis beyond yeast, 68 species spanning major phylogenetic clades also demonstrate a negative scaling between cell density and cell size. Together, these results suggest that decreased internal density is a conserved consequence of increasing cell size, revealing a fundamental cellular trade-off between volume expansion and material concentration. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* co-first authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00