Evidence in favor of abrupt over gradual learning in the differential reinforcement of response duration (DRRD) task

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The study experimentally tested whether learning in a differential reinforcement of response duration (DRRD) task in naïve rats proceeds gradually or abruptly, using the requirement to remain in a nosepoke for at least 1.5 seconds to receive a sugar pellet. The authors compared several continuous learning models with a single change-point (CP) model, fitting each to data from individual rats while using real-time elapsed since experiment onset as a continuous variable rather than trial-segmented behavior. All rats showed increased nosepoke waiting from early to late in the experiment, but model comparisons strongly favored the CP model, and the CP model’s residuals were Gaussian, indicating no remaining systematic dynamics beyond the change point. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,698 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Learning can occur in markedly different ways: in some cases, it unfolds as a gradual process, with behavior improving slowly toward an asymptotic level of performance; in others, it appears as an abrupt process that sharply separates behavior before and after a change point. Under-standing the behavioral and neural processes underlying these distinct acquisition patterns may be critical for elucidating the basic principles of learning. We investigated this question experimentally using naïve rats performing a differential reinforcement of response duration (DRRD) task, in which animals were required to remain inside a nosepoke for a minimum duration of 1.5 seconds to get a sugar pellet as a reward. All rats learned to wait longer in the nosepoke when comparing behavior at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. We tested several continuous models against a single change point (CP) model, in which behavior changes at a specific moment and remains stable thereafter. Instead of the traditional approach based on trial-segmented behavior, we used the real time elapsed since the beginning of the experiment as a continuous, uncontrolled variable. We fitted all models to data from individual rats and compared model fit quality across alternatives. Our results provide strong evidence in favor of an abrupt change, as captured by the CP model, over all other models. Moreover, the residuals of the CP model exhibited a Gaussian distribution, suggesting that no additional systematic dynamics remained unexplained and that the behavioral dynamics were fully captured by a single change point. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00