Assessing Argument Quality in L2 Writing: Integrating Argumentation Models and Intellectual Standards

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The rubrics used in most standardized language tests for argumentative writing extensively focus on surface-level language features, while often neglecting the rigor and effectiveness of argumentation. Furthermore, the diverse argumentation models and rhetorical conventions employed by L2 writers further raise concerns about the fairness and validity of rubrics based on predetermined frameworks. Existing rubrics show considerable divergence, with many lacking a data-driven foundation and failing to incorporate input from learners and writing instructors. To address these issues, this study proposes a refined rubric that more accurately captures both the structural and substantive elements of argumentation by integrating argument models and Paul and Elder's (1999) Intellectual Standards. A five-point scale rubric was developed and validated through discourse analysis of 104 EFL argumentative essays, refined by iterative scoring-revision cycles and feedback from five L2 learners and a writing instructor. The study contributes to the development of a more comprehensive, theory-informed, and context-sensitive framework for L2 writing assessment.
Full text 2,276 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The rubrics used in most standardized language tests for argumentative writing extensively focus on surface-level language features, while often neglecting the rigor and effectiveness of argumentation. Furthermore, the diverse argumentation models and rhetorical conventions employed by L2 writers further raise concerns about the fairness and validity of rubrics based on predetermined frameworks. Existing rubrics show considerable divergence, with many lacking a data-driven foundation and failing to incorporate input from learners and writing instructors. To address these issues, this study proposes a refined rubric that more accurately captures both the structural and substantive elements of argumentation by integrating argument models and Paul and Elder's (1999) Intellectual Standards. A five-point scale rubric was developed and validated through discourse analysis of 104 EFL argumentative essays, refined by iterative scoring-revision cycles and feedback from five L2 learners and a writing instructor. The study contributes to the development of a more comprehensive, theory-informed, and context-sensitive framework for L2 writing assessment. Supplementary Material File (preprint_assessing argument quality in l2 writing.pdf) - Download - 2.22 MB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 379views 146downloads Citations Download citation Zihan Xu, Peiyun Liu. Assessing Argument Quality in L2 Writing: Integrating Argumentation Models and Intellectual Standards. Authorea. 28 April 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174585775.51352203/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174585775.51352203/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00