High doses of fine biochar in sandy subsoils increase water retention, but also cause first-year yield depressions for drought-stressed barley
High doses of fine biochar in sandy subsoils increase water retention but reduce first-year barley yield and nitrogen uptake due to immobilization.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper investigated whether incorporating high doses of fine-grained biochar (150 or 300 Mg/ha, tested as 1%, 2%, and 4% fine biochar or 2% pellets) into coarse sandy subsoil layers could improve water retention, nutrient uptake, root development, and spring barley performance under drought conditions, using a two-year mesocosm soil-column study in 2022–2023. Ground fine biochar increased available water capacity, while intact biochar pellets showed no measurable effect; however, the first-year (2022) biochar treatments reduced plant growth and nitrogen uptake, likely due to nitrogen immobilization, and root density decreased with increasing biochar concentration in one soil type, possibly linked to higher potassium levels. In the second year (2023), after winter irrigation, yield effects shifted to neutral to positive, and phosphorus uptake remained unimproved despite wetter, P-enriched subsoils. The study’s main limitation is that it is a controlled mesocosm experiment with only two seasons, so it cannot fully characterize longer-term field-scale nutrient dynamics and application methods, which the authors call for via long-term trials. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,308 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00