Predicting recovery trajectories and injury severity following partial crush spinal cord injury in mice
The study investigated inter-animal variability in recovery after partial thoracic spinal cord injury in mice by using open-field behavioral data collected during the first 3 days post-injury to create an Acute Functional Score (AFS). Using latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling with open field and grid walk testing, the authors identified three AFS-defined recovery trajectory subgroups and reported 83–92% prediction accuracy for trajectory classification, with subgroup differences reflected in treadmill kinematics and histology (lesion size and astrocyte bridging). They applied the same framework to mice treated with saline or biomaterial vehicle injected at 3 days post-SCI, showing robust predictive accuracy while revealing disproportionate injury severity distributions between groups, which the paper presents as a way to expose procedural bias. The paper’s main limitation is that the framework is built on early (first 3-day) behavioral data from a mouse partial crush SCI model. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
1,460 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00