Non-profits deliver more accurate forestry carbon credits than for-profits

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The preprint studied avoided deforestation carbon credits and examined whether the implementing and validating organization type (non-profit vs for-profit) affects how accurately credits represent real emission reductions. Using a comparative analysis, the authors found that non-profits were more than twice as likely as for-profits to deliver credits that represent real emission reductions. A key limitation explicitly noted is that the work is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed by a journal. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Carbon credits from avoided deforestation projects have been criticised for overcrediting. Here, we investigate how the type of organisation implementing and validating the projects affects outcomes. We show that non-profits are more than twice as likely as for-profits to deliver carbon credits that represent real emission reductions.  
Full text 9,513 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Non-profits deliver more accurate forestry carbon credits than for-profits | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Non-profits deliver more accurate forestry carbon credits than for-profits Benedict Probst, Anna Neumann, Thales A. P. West, Lambert Schneider, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Carbon credits from avoided deforestation projects have been criticised for overcrediting. Here, we investigate how the type of organisation implementing and validating the projects affects outcomes. We show that non-profits are more than twice as likely as for-profits to deliver carbon credits that represent real emission reductions. Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental social sciences/Climate-change mitigation Scientific community and society/Social sciences/Economics Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5982419","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":433767790,"identity":"ecc094b1-f01e-4f94-9642-73bd3343ea4e","order_by":0,"name":"Benedict Probst","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-8938","institution":"Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Benedict","middleName":"","lastName":"Probst","suffix":""},{"id":433767791,"identity":"ae56e51a-a21b-494d-9c9a-b6cce5839728","order_by":1,"name":"Anna Neumann","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anna","middleName":"","lastName":"Neumann","suffix":""},{"id":433767792,"identity":"f74195f5-c359-4a7d-857e-50c9530031b8","order_by":2,"name":"Thales A. P. West","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3896-6516","institution":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Thales","middleName":"A. P.","lastName":"West","suffix":""},{"id":433767793,"identity":"908cd8f6-2aea-4f9e-b4fe-64ff8db3d679","order_by":3,"name":"Lambert Schneider","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-0965","institution":"Öko-Institut","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lambert","middleName":"","lastName":"Schneider","suffix":""},{"id":433767794,"identity":"fb59938d-1b50-458c-bbd5-bc948a25e3a3","order_by":4,"name":"Malte Toetzke","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Malte","middleName":"","lastName":"Toetzke","suffix":""},{"id":433767795,"identity":"31730c7d-a595-4647-8514-700a42687cfb","order_by":5,"name":"Philipp Trotter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Wuppertal","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Trotter","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-02-07 15:26:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":94823885,"identity":"3ffb72d8-d5be-439e-9a47-abdd09e153cf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-31 06:48:13","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":647314,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"250205Briefcomvf.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5982419/v1_covered_25071c76-f019-436c-b515-109459862012.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Non-profits deliver more accurate forestry carbon credits than for-profits","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Carbon credits from avoided deforestation projects have been criticised for overcrediting. Here, we investigate how the type of organisation implementing and validating the projects affects outcomes. We show that non-profits are more than twice as likely as for-profits to deliver carbon credits that represent real emission reductions.\r\n ","manuscriptTitle":"Non-profits deliver more accurate forestry carbon credits than for-profits","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-03-26 01:14:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5982419/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":2}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8b93864a-bf1e-4f50-97f8-483488e5277d","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 26th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":46187912,"name":"Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental social sciences/Climate-change mitigation"},{"id":46187913,"name":"Scientific community and society/Social sciences/Economics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-10-30T12:56:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-03-26 01:14:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5982419","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5982419","identity":"rs-5982419","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00