How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,917 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks Abstract Prospective memory (PM) enables individuals to remember and execute future intentions, a function critical for daily activities such as replying to e-mails. This systematic review synthesises electrophysiological findings on event-based PM tasks in young adults, focusing on how cue nature affects behavioural performance and neural processing. Following PRISMA guidelines, 34 studies were examined to delineate common ERP signatures associated with PM cue processing. Embedding a PM task within an ongoing task (OT) consistently modulates neural activity, contributing to early occipital-parietal negativity (250-400 ms) that may reflect initial cue detection and sustained frontal and parietal positivities (200-1000 ms) linked to controlled retrieval and working memory updating. Notably, nonfocal PM cues produce enhanced and prolonged ERP effects, indicating greater demands on strategic monitoring and top-down control than focal cues, which favours spontaneous retrieval theoretical models. Comparisons between PM cues and OT trials further reveal that cues elicit additional early sensory processing reflected in larger frontal positivities and retrieval operations manifested by sustained parietal positivities. Focal cues tend to trigger a more transient retrieval process with shorter ERP components, whereas nonfocal cues produce enhanced and prolonged frontal and parietal responses. Moreover, factors such as cue frequency, salience, emotional valence, and language context modulate these neural responses, underscoring a flexible interplay between automatic and controlled processes. Collectively, these converging findings refine theoretical models - including the Multiprocess Theory and the Dynamic Multiprocess Framework - and advance our understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying PM. Supplementary Material File (manuscript.docx) - Download - 177.45 KB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 208views 132downloads Citations Download citation Beatriz Mello, Raquel Pinto, Pedro B. Albuquerque, et al. How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks. Authorea. 24 June 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175077365.55693327/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175077365.55693327/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00