Consequences of training data composition for deep learning models in single-cell biology

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,641 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Foundation models for single-cell transcriptomics have the potential to augment (or replace) purpose-built tools for a variety of common analyses, especially when data are sparse. Recent work with large language models has shown that training data composition greatly shapes performance; however, to date, single-cell foundation models have ignored this aspect, opting instead to train on the largest possible corpus. We systematically investigate the consequences of training dataset composition on the behavior of deep learning models of single-cell transcriptomics, focusing on human hematopoiesis as a tractable model system and including cells from adult and developing tissues, disease states, and perturbation atlases. We find that (1) these models generalize poorly to unseen cell types, (2) adding malignant cells to a healthy cell training corpus does not necessarily improve modeling of unseen malignant cells, and (3) including an embryonic stem cell differentiation atlas during training improves performance on out-of-distribution tasks. Our results emphasize the importance of diverse training data and suggest strategies to optimize future single-cell foundation models. Competing Interest Statement AN and AG contributed to this work while interning at Microsoft. SR and PSW receive research funding from Microsoft. MH, NF, APA, and LC are employees of Microsoft and own equity in Microsoft. SR holds equity in Amgen unrelated to this work. P.S.W. reports compensation for consulting/speaking from Engine Ventures and AbbVie unrelated to this work. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00