Reply: Iatrogenic breaching of the junctional zone: the unintended path to placenta accreta spectrum?

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This item is a reply/letter that provides administrative information rather than new experimental or observational results, including contributor roles, funding (none), competing interests (none), ethics approval by the CHU Brugmann ethics committee, and confirmation of informed consent and data availability on request. The authors also affirm transparency and report that no important aspects were omitted and that any planned-versus-executed discrepancies are explained. The content does not describe a studied population, methods, or key findings in the text provided. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,351 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Ack

The authors have no acknowledgements to declare.

Fn Group

Contributors: Surgical and Medical Practices: E.G., P.T., H.V.K., S.K., I.A., A.S., R.C., S.G., Concept: E.G., R.C., S.G., Design: R.C., E.G., S.G., P.T., Data Collection or Processing: E.G., R.C., S.G., P.T., I.A., A.S., H.V.K., Analysis or Interpretation: E.G., R.C., S.G., P.T., Literature Search: E.G., P.T., Writing: E.G., P.T., R.C., S.G. Funding: The authors declared that this study received no financial support. Competing interests: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors. Ethical approval: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments and was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee of CHU Brugmann (le Comité d’Ethique Hospitalier du CHU Brugmann), approval number CE 2024/111, date: 13.08.2024. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. Data sharing: All data is available to be shared upon request to the corresponding author. Transparency: The authors affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-07T06:07:59.301721+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0