Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations

endometrial cancer, hormone replacement therapy, menopause, estrogen https://doi.org/10.36000/HBT.OH.2026.27.203 healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2026 Endometrial cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with an increasing incidence driven primarily by rising obesity and aging populations. While survival rates are high, particularly for early-stage, low- grade disease, many endometrial cancer survivors experience significant menopausal symptoms due to the definitive surgical treatments. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor and genitourinary symptoms of menopause; however, its use in women with endometrial cancer has been met with caution. This review synthesizes the current evidence, evaluates risk stratification models and offers a practical, patient-centered approach to the use of HRT in endometrial cancer survivors. PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE Peer reviewers: Prof. Andreas Günthert, Gynecological Tumor Center St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland Dr Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis, Gynecological Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Received on December 15, 2025; accepted after peer review on February 23, 2026; published online on February 25, 2026.

Endometrial cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women globally and the most frequently diagnosed gynecological malignancy in high-income countries.1 In 2022, an estimated 420,000 new cases were reported worldwide, along with approximately 97,000 deaths. The global incidence of endometrial cancer is steadily rising, largely driven by the increasing Corresponding author: Corresponding author: Prof. Dr Marcus Vetter Cancer Center Baselland Medical University Clinic Cantonal Hospital Baselland Rheinstrasse 26 4410 Liestal Switzerland Email: [email protected] a Gobrecht-Keller U, Vetter M. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations. healthbook TIMES Onco Hema. 2026;27(1):32-37. doi:10.36000/HBT.OH.2026.27.203 prevalence of obesity and the aging population.2,3 While Type I endometrioid carcinomas that are estrogen- and adiposity-associated remain the largest contributor to overall disease incidence, multiple population-based registries have reported steep relative increases in Type II high-risk, relatively hormone-independent non-endometrioid histologies in the United States and in parts of Europe.4‑6 Endometrial cancer typically affects postmenopausal women, with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years.7 In most cases, abnormal vaginal bleeding facilitates early detection, enabling diagnosis before the disease extends beyond the uterus in approximately 75% of patients.8,9 The prognosis is generally favorable, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 86%, which increases to 97% when the disease is confined to the uterus. In Switzerland, the 5-year relative survival rate reported between 2000 and 2009 was 75.2%.10 The standard treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), typically performed via a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach, resulting in surgical menopause in premenopausal women who represent roughly 25% of cases.2,9 In addition to hysterectomy and BSO, current guidelines from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)/European Society of Pathology (ESP),2 as well as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN),11 recommend sentinel lymph node mapping as part of standard surgical staging in early-stage endometrial cancer. Menopausal symptoms, such as hot flashes, night sweats, sleep disturbances, mood changes, vaginal atrophy and sexual dysfunction, can significantly impact quality of life (QoL). In women who have undergone treatment for endometrial cancer, these symptoms may be more severe than those experienced during natural menopause.12 Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), using either estrogen alone or in combination with progestin, remains the most effective treatment for alleviating menopausal symptoms. However, concerns regarding the potential risk of cancer recurrence have limited its use among endometrial cancer survivors. This review article summarizes the current evidence on the oncologic safety of HRT in this population and provides recommendations regarding its appropriate use in patients with endometrial cancer. Endometrial cancer: Background and classification Traditionally, endometrial cancer has been classified into two broad types based on histopathological features and hormonal responsiveness.9,13 Type I cancers are predominantly endometrioid adenocarcinomas, which are estrogen-dependent, generally low-grade and most often diagnosed at an early stage. These tumors typically arise in the setting of unopposed estrogen exposure, often related to obesity, metabolic syndrome or chronic anovulation, and are associated with a favorable prognosis. In contrast, Type II cancers, which include serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma and Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 33 carcinosarcoma, are not clearly hormone-driven, exhibit high-grade histologic features and tend to behave more aggressively with a higher risk of recurrence and metastasis. They are also more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage and are associated with significantly worse outcomes. While stage IA endometrioid tumors are associated with 5-year survival rates of >90%, patients with high-risk histologic subtypes often have survival rates below 50%.2,7 Reflecting the advances in understanding tumor biology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recently updated its staging criteria to incorporate both histologic and molecular features.13 The updated ESGO/ESTRO/ESP clinical guidelines2 incorporate the new approach through an integrated classification model that combines histotype, tumor grade, invasion pattern, lymphovascular space invasion and key molecular alterations, enabling individualized treatment planning and improved prognostication. Risks of HRT in endometrial cancer: The Women’s Health Initiative trial The use of HRT in endometrial cancer survivors has long been a subject of debate due to concerns regarding the potential for hormone-driven tumor recurrence. Traditionally, HRT was avoided following endometrial cancer treatment, largely due to evidence from the general population showing that both tamoxifen and unopposed estrogen are associated with an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma14‑17 due to stimulation of the mitotic activity of the endometrium, which potentially increases its susceptibility to malignant transformation.18,19 These findings led to the assumption that any estrogen exposure in women previously treated for endometrial cancer could stimulate residual malignant cells and increase the risk of recurrence, even though adding progestin can mitigate this effect. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial evaluated the safety of HRT in postmenopausal women with an intact uterus.20 A total of 16,608 patients received conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg/day) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/day) (n=8,506) or placebo (n=8,102). The primary endpoint was coronary heart disease (CHD), including nonfatal myocardial infarction and CHD death, with invasive breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome. The study demonstrated an increased incidence of CHD (HR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.02–1.63]) and breast cancer (HR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.00–1.59]) versus placebo at an average follow-up of 5.2 years. The estrogen plus progestin arm of the WHI study was prematurely closed because the overall risks exceeded the benefits. Notably, these risks were not observed in the latter-reported estrogen-alone component of the study in postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy (n=10,739) (CHD, HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.75–1.12]; breast cancer, HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.59–1.01]), albeit a higher risk of stroke (HR: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.10–1.77]) was noted.21 The results also suggested that estrogen alone had advantages over estrogen plus progestin. Importantly, there were fewer endometrial cancers in the combined HRT arm Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 34 compared with the placebo arm (yearly incidence, 0.06% vs 0.10%; HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.48–0.89]; p=0.007) and statistically nonsignificant reduction in deaths from endometrial cancer in the HRT arm (5 vs 11 deaths, HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.15–1.22]) after a median cumulative follow-up of 13 years.22 Long-term follow-up data of the trial (mean, 10.7 years) in women receiving unopposed estrogen (median use, 5.9 years) indicated no differences in the postintervention risk of stroke (0.36% vs 0.41% with placebo, HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.64–1.24]), while the breast cancer reduction persisted overall (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.62–0.95]) and total cancer incidence post-intervention did not differ significantly (HR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.77–1.13]).23 Nevertheless, HRT in endometrial cancer survivors was historically restricted to patients with severe vasomotor symptoms or urogenital atrophy due to concerns of occult disease. Recent evidence of HRT safety in endometrial cancer survivors More recent evidence challenged the concept of avoiding HRT following endometrial cancer treatment, indicating no increased risk of cancer recurrence, particularly in women with low-risk disease who have undergone complete surgical treatment. The data from key studies investigating the safety of HRT in women with endometrial cancer are summarized below. The randomized, double-blind GOG 137 trial performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group evaluated the effect of estrogen replacement therapy versus placebo on recurrence rate and survival in women who have undergone hysterectomy for stage I–IIB endometrial carcinoma.24 Enrollment dropped sharply following the publication of the initial WHI results, although patients were receiving estrogen alone and not estrogen plus progesterone. Ultimately, the trial was stopped prematurely with 1,236 eligible patients enrolled, as it became evident that reaching the planned accrual target of 2,108 patients was no longer feasible. At a median follow-up of 35.7 months, recurrence rates in the overall population were low and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 94.3% in the HRT group and 95.6% in the placebo group.24 The trial showed no significant difference in recurrence risk between the HRT and placebo arms (relative risk [RR]: 1.27 [80% CI: 0.916–1.77]). Although the study did not enroll a sufficient number of high-risk patients and could not conclusively confirm or refute the safety of HRT in terms of recurrence risk, it did demonstrate a low incidence of recurrence and new malignancies, thereby contributing to the evidence base for evaluating the overall risk–benefit profile of HRT in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. Of note, a retrospective analysis of the trial data showed a racial disparity in the HRT arm, with increased risk of recurrence among Black versus White patients who continued to receive HRT following primary treatment (RR: 11.2 [95% CI: 2.86–43.59]; p=0.0005).25 Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 35 A prospective case-control study by Ayhan et al. evaluating the safety of immediate postoperative HRT in endometrial cancer survivors included 50 women with stage I or II endometrioid-type endometrial cancer who received HRT initiated 4–8 weeks after surgery and 52 matched controls who did not receive HRT.26 The average duration of HRT was 49.1 months and most patients continued therapy for ≥24 months. The study demonstrated no recurrences in the HRT group during follow-up. In the control group, one pelvic recurrence occurred at 12 months, resulting in death despite chemotherapy, and one death due to intercurrent disease at 21 months post surgery. Adverse effects of HRT were minimal, with seven patients discontinued the treatment, among them only two within the first 24 months. While the study was non-randomized and had a limited sample size, the data demonstrated that immediate postoperative use of continuous HRT did not increase the risk of recurrence or death in women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer. Several systematic reviews aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HRT in women treated for endometrial cancer. Edey et al.27 identified GOG 13724 as the only randomized controlled trial that met the inclusion criteria for assessing HRT in this patient population, based on searches of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase. Di Donato et al. screened 1,332 abstracts and included seven eligible studies in the analysis, among them four retrospective series, one prospective study, one randomized controlled trial and one population-based study.28 Overall, across predominantly stage I–II cohorts, HRT use was not associated with a statistically significant increase in recurrence compared with controls. An important limitation was selection bias, as HRT was preferentially prescribed to younger women with low-risk, early-stage disease. A more recent meta- analysis included both randomized and observational studies, comprising 10 papers published between 1986 and 2021.29 Of these, two reported data from randomized clinical trials, five were non-randomized cohort studies and three were case-control studies.24‑26,30‑34 The total sample included 7,944 patients, including 1,801 treated with HRT and 6,015 controls. Based on four studies that allowed time-dependent analysis, the study indicated no significant difference in disease-free survival between women treated with HRT and those not treated (pooled HR: 0.90 (95% CI: 0.28–2.87). However, significantly increased risk of recurrence was reported among Black American women treated with continuous estrogen (HR: 7.58 (95% CI: 1.96–29.31),29 confirming the findings of the GOG 137 trial.25 A pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.48–0.83) across all included studies indicated a significantly reduced risk of recurrence among endometrial cancer survivors treated with HRT. Combined estrogen and progestin therapy, particularly when administered in cyclic regimens, appeared to be the most favorable for reducing the recurrence risk. The results of this study are summarized in Figure 1 . Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 36 Figure 1. Forest plot of hazard ratio (HR) meta-analysis (A) and odds ratio (OR) (B) meta-analysis for disease-free survival/recurrence risk showing a pooled random effect model and subgroup analysis by ethnicity in endometrial cancer patients with or without hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Adapted from Londero et al. 2021.29 Reuse of the image is permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. Copyright © Authors or their employers. Published in J Clin Med. Taken together, the existing evidence suggests that HRT appears safe in women with low-grade, early-stage endometrial cancer after hysterectomy. However, since most available data are derived from surgically treated stage I cohorts with limited use of adjuvant radiotherapy or systemic therapy, the oncologic safety of HRT in women receiving adjuvant treatment remains insufficiently studied, warranting a cautious approach. Therapy initiation should be tailored to the patient’s needs and undertaken following careful

with the patient regarding its risks and benefits. As molecular classification is increasingly incorporated into prognostic risk stratification and treatment planning, it may further refine individualized counselling regarding the use of HRT after endometrial cancer. While clinical evidence remains limited, this approach may become relevant for polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient, no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and p53-abnormal tumors. Specifically, the excellent prognosis of POLE-mutated tumors could support a more permissive approach, whereas p53-abnormal or serous-like disease may justify greater caution with systemic HRT. Beyond HRT safety, the potential protective role of progestins after hysterectomy remains a relevant clinical question. In healthy postmenopausal women, continuous combined estrogen–progestin therapy has been associated with a reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer, supporting Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 37 a biologically plausible antiproliferative effect of progestins on residual endometrial tissue.35 Consistent with this rationale, a systematic review by Shim et al. reported an inverse association between recurrence risk and the use of combined estrogen–progestin therapy compared with estrogen monotherapy in endometrial cancer survivors, suggesting a possible protective effect.36 Moreover, in selected young women with atypical hyperplasia or well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer who desire fertility preservation, high-dose oral progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices are established therapeutic options until endometrial normalization is achieved, further underscoring the antitumor activity of progestins in hormonally driven disease.2 However, these potential benefits must be balanced against important safety considerations. Progestin-containing regimens are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with estrogen-only therapy, and may exert unfavorable metabolic and cardiovascular effects.37,38 This is particularly relevant in women with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome or obesity, which are highly prevalent among patients with endometrial cancer, thereby limiting the routine use of progestins after hysterectomy and reinforcing the need for individualized risk–benefit assessment. Recommendations for the use of HRT in women with endometrial cancer Choice of HRT regimen The choice of HRT in endometrial cancer survivors depends on surgical history, symptom profile, comorbidities and oncologic risk. Swiss clinical practice is aligned with the ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines for the management of endometrial carcinoma,2 while substance- and route-specific recommendations for menopausal HRT follow the European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) guidelines.39 In addition to treating menopausal symptoms, the decision for or against HRT should include a

of other long-term benefits of HRT with the patient. In women under 60 years of age using HRT, the absolute risks for overall mortality, fractures, diabetes mellitus (estrogen-progesterone therapy and estrogen-only therapy) and breast cancer (estrogen therapy) are reduced. This is especially important in women with endometrial cancer who often have a higher risk of these diseases due to obesity and already existing unfavorable metabolic profile. In patients who have undergone total hysterectomy for low-grade early- stage endometrial cancer and whose menopausal symptoms significantly compromise their QoL, estrogen-only replacement therapy at the lowest effective dose could be considered.11,12,40,41 Common formulations based on early studies include oral 17β-estradiol (E2) starting at a dose of 1 mg/day Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 38 or conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) at 0.625 mg/day (not available/used in Switzerland).42‑44 Alternatively, transdermal estradiol patches delivering 25 (low dose) to 100 µg/day (high dose), estradiol gel or spray are also widely used. Transdermal administration is often favored in women with cardiovascular risk factors because it is associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke and cardiovascular events due to avoiding first-pass hepatic metabolism, which results in fewer adverse effects on coagulation and inflammatory markers.40,43,45 For patients experiencing isolated genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) with persistent symptoms, low-dose local estrogen therapy delivered via cream, pessary or intravaginal ring may be considered due to its minimal systemic absorption and endometrial safety profile.46‑49 This approach is supported by both the EMAS and Swiss expert recommendations and is appropriate when vasomotor symptoms are absent and GSM remains the predominant clinical concern. Timing of HRT administration The initiation of systemic HRT is generally delayed until 6–12 months after the completion of cancer treatment, allowing for confirmation of disease remission.11 This cautious approach aligns with clinical consensus to reduce the risk of stimulating residual or occult disease. Therapy should be initiated at the lowest effective dose and reassessed annually. Monitoring includes regular clinical evaluation and adjustment of therapy based on symptom control and emerging health risks. Who should avoid HRT? HRT is contraindicated in patients with active or recurrent disease and in those with high-risk histologic subtypes such as serous, clear cell or carcinosarcoma or with advanced-stage disease (FIGO stage III or IV).11, 12,40 While data are lacking for these populations, there is a theoretical concern regarding the potential for hormone-driven recurrence. In addition, contraindications unrelated to cancer, including a personal history of thromboembolism, active liver disease or estrogen-sensitive comorbidities, should be carefully considered in line with general menopause management guidelines. Alternative non-hormonal options For women who are ineligible for or who decline HRT, non-hormonal therapies should be considered.12,40 Vasomotor symptoms can be managed with selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as escitalopram or venlafaxine, or with alternatives, such as gabapentin and oxybutynin. Genitourinary symptoms may respond to non-hormonal vaginal moisturizers and lubricants or newer interventions, such as vaginal laser therapy, although the latter requires further validation. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 39 In addition to established non-hormonal therapies, novel agents targeting neurokinin-3 (NK3) and neurokonin-1 (NK1) receptors have recently emerged as effective options for vasomotor symptom control. NK3 receptor antagonists, such as fezolinetant, and NK1/NK3 receptor antagonists, such as elinzanetant, reduce hot flashes by modulating hypothalamic thermoregulatory pathways without direct estrogenic or progestogenic activity.50 Fezolinetant has demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and is approved in several European countries, including Switzerland.51‑53 These agents represent a particularly attractive option for endometrial cancer survivors in whom systemic HRT is contraindicated or declined, although long-term safety data in oncology populations remain limited. Special considerations In women with Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) undergoing risk-reducing hysterectomy with BSO at a young age (35–45 years), the management of premature menopause is a common indication for HRT. In this setting, systemic estrogen-only therapy can be offered after premenopausal BSO.2,54 Patient counseling and long-term follow-up Effective counseling is essential given the limited data from large randomized controlled trials in this population. Clinicians should provide a balanced

of the known benefits and theoretical risks of HRT,9 tailoring recommendations based on cancer characteristics, symptom severity, patient preference and overall comorbidity profile. Long-term follow-up with a gynecologic oncologist is recommended and should include regular physical examinations, imaging as clinically indicated and ongoing evaluation of symptom control and treatment tolerability.

Hormone replacement therapy can be safely offered to carefully selected survivors of early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer who suffer from significant menopausal symptoms. Current evidence, primarily from observational studies, supports the oncologic safety of estrogen-only regimens in this population. For women with advanced-stage or high-risk histologic subtypes, the absence of robust data continues to warrant a cautious approach. In all cases, treatment decisions should be guided by individualized risk assessment, symptom burden and patient preference, supported by ongoing follow-up within a multidisciplinary framework. Molecular risk stratification is likely to become increasingly relevant for individualized counseling and recommendations regarding HRT after endometrial cancer. Figure 2 summarizes the current state of evidence and outlines a practical approach to HRT use in endometrial cancer survivors. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 40 Figure 2. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in endometrial cancer (EC) survivors. ESGO, European Society of Gynaecological Oncology; ESP, European Society of Pathology; ESTRO, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. Conflict of interest Marcus Vetter received honoraria for consultancy from GSK, Roche, Novartis, ExactSciences, Pfizer, Stemline, AbbVie and ASC Oncology. Ursula Gobrecht-Keller received honoraria for consultancy from Astellas, Bayer and Gedeon Richter. These funding entities did not play a role in the development of the manuscript and did not influence its content in any way. Funding The authors declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Author contributions Both authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript. Submitted: December 15, 2025 CEST. Accepted: February 23, 2026 CEST. Published: February 25, 2026 CEST. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-SA-4.0). View this license's legal deed at https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 and legal code at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode for more information. Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 41

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834 2. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, et al. ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: update 2025. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(8):e423-e435. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00167-6 3. Feng J, Lin R, Li H, Wang J, He H. Global and regional trends in the incidence and mortality burden of endometrial cancer, 1990-2019: Updated results from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2019. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024;137(3):294-302. doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000002841 4. Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Harvey SV, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(22):1895-1908. doi:10.1200/ jco.19.00151 5. Herbst F, Dickman PW, Moberg L, Högberg T, Borgfeldt C. Increased incidence and improved survival in endometrial cancer in Sweden 1960–2014: a population-based registry survey. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):276. doi:10.1186/s12885-023-10746-0 6. Rodríguez-Palacios D, Colorado-Yohar SM, Velten M, Vaamonde-Martín RJ, Ballesta M, Chirlaque MD. Incidence and Trend of Type I and II Endometrial Cancer in Women from Two Population-Based European Cancer Registries (1998-2012). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3789. doi:10.3390/ijerph19073789 7. Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer. SEER - National Cancer Institute. Accessed September 2025. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html 8. Sonoda Y, Barakat RR. Screening and the prevention of gynecologic cancer: Endometrial cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(2):363-377. doi:10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2005.10.015 9. Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(9):860-877. doi:10.1016/ j.annonc.2022.05.009 10. Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Lorez M, the NICER Working Group. Trends in Survival from Cancer of the Corpus uteri in Switzerland. Schweizer Krebs-Bulletin. 2014;34(2):137-142. doi:10.5167/uzh-107942 11. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Uterine Neoplasms. Version 3.2025. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Accessed August 2025. http:// www.nccn.org 12. Hickey M, Basu P, Sassarini J, et al. Managing menopause after cancer. Lancet. 2024;403(10430):984-996. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02802-7 13. Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162(2):383-394. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14923 14. Furness S, Roberts H, Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A. Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD000402. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000402.pub4 15. Beral V, Bull D, Reeves G, Million Women Study Collaborators. Endometrial cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1543-1551. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66455-0 Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 42 16. Grady D, Gebretsadik T, Kerlikowske K, Ernster V, Petitti D. Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(2):304-313. doi:10.1016/ 0029-7844(94)00383-O 17. Judd HL, Mebane-Sims I, Legault C, et al. Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Endometrial Histology in Postmenopausal Women: The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 1996;275(5):370-375. doi:10.1001/ jama.1996.03530290040035 18. Key TJ, Pike MC. The dose-effect relationship between “unopposed” oestrogens and endometrial mitotic rate: its central role in explaining and predicting endometrial cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 1988;57(2):205-212. doi:10.1038/bjc.1988.44 19. Akhmedkhanov A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Toniolo P. Role of exogenous and endogenous hormones in endometrial cancer: review of the evidence and research perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;943:296-315. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03811.x 20. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321-333. doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 21. Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1701-1712. doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1701 22. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Sarto GE, et al. Continuous Combined Estrogen Plus Progestin and Endometrial Cancer: The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(3):djv350. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv350 23. LaCroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, et al. Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1305-1314. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.382 24. Barakat RR, Bundy BN, Spirtos NM, Bell J, Mannel RS, Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Estrogen Replacement Therapy Versus Placebo in Stage I or II Endometrial Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(4):587-592. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.8464 25. Maxwell GL, Tian C, Risinger JI, Hamilton CA, Barakat RR, Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Racial disparities in recurrence among patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: is recurrence increased in black patients who receive estrogen replacement therapy? Cancer. 2008;113(6):1431-1437. doi:10.1002/cncr.23717 26. Ayhan A, Taskiran C, Simsek S, Sever A. Does immediate hormone replacement therapy affect the oncologic outcome in endometrial cancer survivors? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(2):805-808. doi:10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200603000-00054 27. Edey KA, Rundle S, Hickey M. Hormone replacement therapy for women previously treated for endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):Cd008830. doi:10.1002/ 14651858.CD008830.pub3 28. Di Donato V, Palaia I, D’Aniello D, et al. Does Hormone Replacement Therapy Impact the Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer Survivors? A Systematic Review. Oncology. 2020;98(4):195-201. doi:10.1159/000505427 29. Londero AP, Parisi N, Tassi A, Bertozzi S, Cagnacci A. Hormone Replacement Therapy in Endometrial Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14):3165. doi:10.3390/ jcm10143165 Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 43 30. Arteaga-Gómez AC, Castellanos-Barroso G, Colin-Valenzuela A, García-Vargas J, Márquez- Acosta G, Reyes-Muñoz E. Hormone therapy effect in postmenopausal women with history of endometrial cancer. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011;79(1):11-17. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ ginobsmex/gom-2011/gom111c.pdf? 31. Cho HW, Ouh YT, Lee JK, Hong JH. Effects of hormone therapy on recurrence in endometrial cancer survivors: a nationwide study using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(4):e51. doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e51 32. Creasman WT, Henderson D, Hinshaw W, Clarke-Pearson DL. Estrogen replacement therapy in the patient treated for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(3):326-330. https:// journals.lww.com/greenjournal/abstract/1986/03000/ estrogen_replacement_therapy_in_the_patient.5.aspx 33. Lee RB, Burke TW, Park RC. Estrogen replacement therapy following treatment for stage I endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;36(2):189-191. doi:10.1016/0090-8258(90)90171-G 34. Suriano KA, McHale M, McLaren CE, Li KT, Re A, DiSaia PJ. Estrogen replacement therapy in endometrial cancer patients: a matched control study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(4):555-560. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01221-7 35. Brinton LA, Lacey JV Jr, Trimble EL. Hormones and endometrial cancer--new data from the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1517-1578. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66431-8 36. Shim SH, Lee SJ, Kim SN. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on the rate of recurrence in endometrial cancer survivors: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(9):1628-1637. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.006 37. Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, Anderson GL, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(8):526-535. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt043 38. Stanczyk FZ, Hapgood JP, Winer S, Mishell DRJ. Progestogens Used in Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Differences in Their Pharmacological Properties, Intracellular Actions, and Clinical Effects. Endocr Rev. 2013;34(2):171-208. doi:10.1210/er.2012-1008 39. Rees M, Abernethy K, Bachmann G, et al. The essential menopause curriculum for healthcare professionals: A European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) position statement. Maturitas. 2022;158:70-77. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.12.001 40. Inwald EC, Albring C, Baum E, et al. Perimenopause and Postmenopause - Diagnosis and Interventions. Guideline of the DGGG and OEGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015-062, September 2020). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(6):612-636. doi:10.1055/ a-1361-1948 41. Pachman DR, Jones JM, Loprinzi CL. Management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: Current treatment options, challenges and future directions. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:123-135. doi:10.2147/ijwh.s7721 42. Rozenberg S, Vandromme J, Antoine C. Postmenopausal hormone therapy: risks and benefits. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(4):216-227. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2013.17 43. Rozenberg S, Al-Daghri N, Aubertin-Leheudre M, et al. Is there a role for menopausal hormone therapy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(12):2271-2286. doi:10.1007/s00198-020-05497-8 44. Langer RD. Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Low-Dose Hormone Therapy in Managing Menopausal Symptoms. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(5):563-573. doi:10.3122/ jabfm.2009.05.080134 Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 44 45. Laliberté F, Dea K, Duh MS, Kahler KH, Rolli M, Lefebvre P. Does the route of administration for estrogen hormone therapy impact the risk of venous thromboembolism? Estradiol transdermal system versus oral estrogen-only hormone therapy. Menopause. 2011;18(10):1052-1059. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3182175e5c 46. Angelou K, Grigoriadis T, Diakosavvas M, Zacharakis D, Athanasiou S. The Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: An Overview of the Recent Data. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7586. doi:10.7759/cureus.7586 47. Santen RJ, Mirkin S, Bernick B, Constantine GD. Systemic estradiol levels with low-dose vaginal estrogens. Menopause. 2020;27(3):361-370. doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001463 48. German Guideline Program in Oncology. S3-Leitlinie Endometriumkarzinom. Langversion 4.01, AWMF-Registernummer 032-034O. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. 2025. Accessed August 2025. https://hub.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/ 49. Constantine GD, Graham S, Lapane K, et al. Endometrial safety of low-dose vaginal estrogens in menopausal women: a systematic evidence review. Menopause. 2019;26(7):800-807. doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001315 50. Gnant M, Vetter M, Stute P. Neurokinin 1/3 Receptor Antagonists for Vasomotor Symptoms in Women with Breast Cancer. healthbook TIMES Onco Hema. 2025;26(4):44-49. doi:10.36000/HBT.OH.2025.26.197 51. VEOZATM (fezolinetant). Information for healthcare professionals. Swissmedic. 2025. Accessed August 2025. https://swissmedicinfo.ch/ 52. Johnson KA, Martin N, Nappi RE, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fezolinetant in Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: A Phase 3 RCT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(8):1981-1997. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad058 53. Lederman S, Ottery FD, Cano A, et al. Fezolinetant for treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause (SKYLIGHT 1): a phase 3 randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2023;401(10382):1091-1102. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00085-5 54. Underkofler KA, Ring KL. Updates in gynecologic care for individuals with lynch syndrome. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1127683. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1127683 Hormone Replacement Therapy After Endometrial Cancer: Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology 45