Studying Individuality in Behavioural Ecology: Overcoming Epistemic Challenges

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,116 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Behavioural ecologists have recently begun to study individuality, that is, individual differences and uniqueness in phenotypic traits and in ecological relations. However, individuality is an unusual object of research. Using an ethnographic case study of individuality research in behavioural ecology, we analyse concerns that behavioural ecologists express about their ability to study individuality. We argue that these concerns stem from two epistemic challenges: the variation-noise challenge and the generalisation challenge. First, individuality is difficult to distinguish from noise, as standard practices lump variation between individuals together with noise. Second, individuality is difficult to capture in generalisations, as they typically involve ignoring idiosyncratic factors. We examine how these challenges shape research practices in behavioural ecology, leading to epistemic strategies for studying individuality via alternative approaches to measurement, experimentation, and generalisation. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2CS7M Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Philosophy individuality, individual differences, Variation, measurement, Generalisation, varipraxis Published: 2025-03-29 07:55 Last Updated: 2025-03-29 07:55 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Questionnaire results and interview transcripts from the project cannot be sufficiently anonymised and are therefore not published. Other materials and data from the project such as questionnaire and interview instruments, participant summaries, lists of codes and code co-occurrences are published as an OSF project under https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RKU47. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00