Neural correlates in basolateral and central amygdala during reward seeking in the face of punishment

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The study examined how the basolateral (BLA) and central (CeA) amygdala contribute to persistent reward-seeking behavior despite punishment threat by recording single-unit activity in trained rats during a lever-press task with outcome-specific auditory and visual cues. After implantation of tetrodes in BLA or CeA and recording activity from roughly 100 neurons per region, the authors found that CeA neurons, and to a lesser extent BLA neurons, differentiated auditory cues and outcomes in ways that partially explained prediction of lever-press latency. Behavioral failure to suppress reward seeking under punishment coincided with reactivation of reward-seeking–sensitive neuronal populations and loss of inhibition of punishment-sensitive populations. This paper is not explicitly about endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT The inability to suppress actions despite adverse consequences is a hallmark of compulsive behaviors and is amygdala dependent. To study the amygdala’s role in responding despite adverse consequences, we compared single-unit activity in the basolateral (BLA) or central (CeA) amygdala before and after reward-seeking under punishment threat. Rats started each trial by pressing an initial lever, which triggered an outcome-specific 5-s auditory cue (white noise, pure tone, or clicker), signaling one of three reinforcement conditions: 100% sucrose reward, 20% reward/80% omission, or 80% reward/20% footshock punishment. Next, the active and inactive levers were extended, and pressing on the active lever terminated the auditory cue and triggered an outcome-specific 1-s visual cue predicting either reward, reward omission, or shock. After training, we implanted eight tetrodes in the BLA (n=7) or CeA (n=5) and recorded single-unit activity of ∼100 neurons per region during task performance. CeA neurons, and to a lesser extent BLA neurons, responded differently to the distinct auditory cues and outcomes. The discrimination between conditions partially explained the capacity of neuronal activity to predict the latency to lever press to complete the trial. The failure to suppress reward-seeking behavior in the face of punishment coincided with the reactivation of reward-seeking-sensitive and the loss of inhibition of punishment-sensitive neuronal populations. In conclusion, we found that after extended training, opposing populations of activated and inhibited neurons in CeA, and to a lesser extent in BLA, control completion of reward-seeking despite punishment.
Full text 1,764 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT The inability to suppress actions despite adverse consequences is a hallmark of compulsive behaviors and is amygdala dependent. To study the amygdala’s role in responding despite adverse consequences, we compared single-unit activity in the basolateral (BLA) or central (CeA) amygdala before and after reward-seeking under punishment threat. Rats started each trial by pressing an initial lever, which triggered an outcome-specific 5-s auditory cue (white noise, pure tone, or clicker), signaling one of three reinforcement conditions: 100% sucrose reward, 20% reward/80% omission, or 80% reward/20% footshock punishment. Next, the active and inactive levers were extended, and pressing on the active lever terminated the auditory cue and triggered an outcome-specific 1-s visual cue predicting either reward, reward omission, or shock. After training, we implanted eight tetrodes in the BLA (n=7) or CeA (n=5) and recorded single-unit activity of ∼100 neurons per region during task performance. CeA neurons, and to a lesser extent BLA neurons, responded differently to the distinct auditory cues and outcomes. The discrimination between conditions partially explained the capacity of neuronal activity to predict the latency to lever press to complete the trial. The failure to suppress reward-seeking behavior in the face of punishment coincided with the reactivation of reward-seeking-sensitive and the loss of inhibition of punishment-sensitive neuronal populations. In conclusion, we found that after extended training, opposing populations of activated and inhibited neurons in CeA, and to a lesser extent in BLA, control completion of reward-seeking despite punishment. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00