The safety and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling in premenopausal women in comparison to postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding
Observational
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This prospective study found that Pipelle endometrial sampling is significantly more painful, less adequate, and less acceptable in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling in premenopausal women in comparison to postmenopausal women.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including a total of 346 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) who were divided into two groups, premenopausal group (N.=210) and postmenopausal group (N.=136). Primary outcome was safety and adequacy of Pipelle sampler. Secondary outcome included patients' acceptability.
RESULTS: Pain scores by Visual Analogue Scale were significantly higher in postmenopausal women compared to premenopausal women (6.5±1.13 versus 4.85±0.86, P<0.001) during Pipelle endometrial sampling. There was also a higher rate of tenaculum use and analgesic requirements with less adequacy of the sample and less acceptability in postmenopausal women (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pipelle endometrial sampling is more painful, less adequate and less acceptable in postmenopausal women compared to premenopausal women with AUB. Further larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:25:40.298144+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:18:11.460223+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK