Aortic annuloplasty FSI digital twin of 3D-printed phantoms with 4D-flow MRI comparison
The study developed and validated a computational fluid-structure interaction (FSI) “digital twin” of a supra-valvular aortic annuloplasty using CAD-modeled, 3D-printed elastic-resin aortic root phantoms tested in a mock circulatory flow loop, with glycerol-water used to match blood viscosity. Using sensor-derived flow and pressure boundary conditions, the authors compared FSI simulation results with experimental velocity fields from 4D-flow MRI for native and post-annuloplasty idealized conditions. They found that annuloplasty increased peak systolic velocity (up to 145.4 cm/s), produced localized flow changes consistent with a higher pressure gradient across the valve, and showed broader velocity distributions during regurgitation; FSI simulations closely matched MRI with strong correlations (r > 0.93) and minimal Bland-Altman differences, especially in systole. The paper’s main limitation is that it uses idealized aortic root phantoms rather than patient-specific geometry. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,224 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00