Bioimaging Data Management Workflow for Plasma Medicine

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Bioimaging experiments in plasma medicine generate complex datasets that go beyond conventional imaging studies by combining microscopy data with heterogeneous metadata from biological experiments and highly parameterized gas plasma treatments. Plasma exposure conditions, such as device configuration, gas composition, and treatment conditions, are critical determinants of biological outcome, yet they are rarely captured in a standardized, machine-readable, and reusable manner. To address this gap, we present a research data management (RDM) workflow that operationalizes the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles across the bioimaging data lifecycle in plasma medicine. The workflow is implemented as a structured pipeline integrating open-source tools, including OMERO for image data management, eLabFTW as an electronic laboratory notebook, Adamant for schema-driven metadata collection, and Micro-Meta App for standardized documentation of microscopy acquisition settings that are connected via programming interfaces to enable persistent linkage of metadata to image datasets using standardized annotations. The workflow is documented in a reproducible tutorial with an open-source Python Jupyter notebook hosted on GitHub. By integrating plasma treatment metadata with imaging data, this approach improves reproducibility, cross-study comparability, and data reuse in plasma medicine research.
Full text 1,521 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Bioimaging experiments in plasma medicine generate complex datasets that go beyond conventional imaging studies by combining microscopy data with heterogeneous metadata from biological experiments and highly parameterized gas plasma treatments. Plasma exposure conditions, such as device configuration, gas composition, and treatment conditions, are critical determinants of biological outcome, yet they are rarely captured in a standardized, machine-readable, and reusable manner. To address this gap, we present a research data management (RDM) workflow that operationalizes the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles across the bioimaging data lifecycle in plasma medicine. The workflow is implemented as a structured pipeline integrating open-source tools, including OMERO for image data management, eLabFTW as an electronic laboratory notebook, Adamant for schema-driven metadata collection, and Micro-Meta App for standardized documentation of microscopy acquisition settings that are connected via programming interfaces to enable persistent linkage of metadata to image datasets using standardized annotations. The workflow is documented in a reproducible tutorial with an open-source Python Jupyter notebook hosted on GitHub. By integrating plasma treatment metadata with imaging data, this approach improves reproducibility, cross-study comparability, and data reuse in plasma medicine research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00