Evaluation of nanopore sequencing on polar bodies for routine pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Structured Abstract BACKGROUND PGT-A using polar body (PB) biopsy derives a clinical benefit by reducing the number of embryo transfers and miscarriage rates but is currently not cost-efficient. Nanopore sequencing technology opens possibilities by providing cost-efficient, fast sequencing results with uncomplicated sample preparation workflows. METHODS In this comparative experimental study, 102 pooled PB samples from 20 patients were analyzed for aneuploidy using nanopore sequencing technology and compared with aCGH results generated as part of the clinical routine. Samples were sequenced on a Nanopore MinION machine for up to 9 hours for 6 pooled PB samples. Whole-chromosome copy-numbers were called by a custom bioinformatic analysis software. Automatically called results were compared to aCGH results. RESULTS Overall, 96/99 samples were consistently detected as euploid or aneuploid in both methods (concordance=97.0%, sensitivity = 0.957, specificity = 1.0, PPV = 1.0, NPV = 0.906). On chromosomal level, concordance reached 98.7%. Chromosomal aneuploidies analyzed in this trial covered all 23 chromosomes with 98 trisomies, and 97 monosomies in 70 aCGH samples. The whole nanopore workflow is feasible in under 5 hours (for one sample) with maximum time of 16 hours (for 12 samples), enabling fresh PB-euploid embryo transfer. Material cost of 150€/sample possibly enable cost-efficient aneuploidy screening. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study, systematically comparing nanopore sequencing for aneuploidy of PBs with standard detection methods. High concordance rates confirmed feasibility of nanopore technology for this application. Additionally, the fast and cost-efficient workflow reveals clinical utility of this technology, making PB PGT-A clinically attractive.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00