The impact of surgery on ovarian reserve in the treatment of endometrioma

article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-17

This prospective study investigated unilateral endometrioma excision without bipolar coagulation and found no statistically significant decrease in anti-Müllerian hormone levels, indicating preserved ovarian reserve.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Operative laparoscopy is the gold standard in the treatment of endometriotic ovarian cysts. Excisional surgery is the best technique to prevent recurrences and improve symptoms; it may result in ovarian reserve damage due to the removal of healthy ovarian cortex. The aim of the study was to investigate the extent of ovarian reserve damage after stripping technique of unilateral endometriomas, by dosing the Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH). This prospective study was conducted in the Center of Mini-Invasive Pelvic Surgery of the Department of Health of Woman and Child of the University of Padua, from October 2010 to June 2012. Twenty-five women underwent excision of monolateral endometriosis ovarian cyst by stripping without accessing bipolar coagulation and performing an intracortical suture. The AMH serum levels were estimated in the early proliferative phase of the cycle, before surgery (time 0), 24 h after surgery (time 1), the first menstrual cycle after surgery (time 2), and the third menstrual cycle after surgery (time 3). We found a non statistically significant decreases in serum AMH levels after surgical excision of endometrioma. Our results suggest that an appropriate surgical technique, without the use of the bipolar coagulation of ovarian border, does not determine a significant reduction of ovarian reserve using the AMH dosage

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T07:33:07.802558+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK