Revealing the nervous system requirements of Alzheimer’s disease risk genes in Drosophila

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Most Alzheimer’s disease (AD) susceptibility genes have poorly understood roles in the central nervous system (CNS). To address this gap, we systematically characterized 100 conserved candidate AD risk genes using a cross-species strategy in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster . Genes were prioritized based primarily on human functional genomic evidence. We generated custom, loss-of-function alleles for each of the conserved fly orthologs. Most of the genes (80%) are expressed in the adult brain, including 24 neuron- and 13 glia-specific expression patterns. Overall, we identify 50 candidate AD risk gene homologs with requirements for CNS structure or function, including 18 whose loss of function causes neurodegeneration (e.g., Snx6/SNX32 and ClC-a/CLCN1 ), 35 required for neurophysiology (e.g., Arr1 / ARRB2, stai/STMN4 ), and 8 with diminished CNS resilience following a thermal or mechanical stress (e.g., cindr/CD2AP , Amph/BIN1 ). In a parallel screen, we found 28 AD risk gene homologs (e.g, Ets98B/SPI1 , Yod1/YOD1 ) that modify the neurotoxicity of either amyloid-β peptide or tau protein, which aggregate to form AD pathology. To translate our findings back to human AD, we developed and deployed oligogenic risk scores based on gene clusters with shared nervous system phenotypes in flies, pinpointing functional pathways that differentially drive AD risk. Our results—available online via the Alzheimer’s Locus Integrative Cross-species Explorer ( alice.nrihub.org )—reveal novel nervous system requirements for dozens of AD risk genes and may enable dissection of causal heterogeneity in AD.
Full text 1,693 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Most Alzheimer’s disease (AD) susceptibility genes have poorly understood roles in the central nervous system (CNS). To address this gap, we systematically characterized 100 conserved candidate AD risk genes using a cross-species strategy in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Genes were prioritized based primarily on human functional genomic evidence. We generated custom, loss-of-function alleles for each of the conserved fly orthologs. Most of the genes (80%) are expressed in the adult brain, including 24 neuron- and 13 glia-specific expression patterns. Overall, we identify 50 candidate AD risk gene homologs with requirements for CNS structure or function, including 18 whose loss of function causes neurodegeneration (e.g., Snx6/SNX32 and ClC-a/CLCN1), 35 required for neurophysiology (e.g., Arr1/ARRB2, stai/STMN4), and 8 with diminished CNS resilience following a thermal or mechanical stress (e.g., cindr/CD2AP, Amph/BIN1). In a parallel screen, we found 28 AD risk gene homologs (e.g, Ets98B/SPI1, Yod1/YOD1) that modify the neurotoxicity of either amyloid-β peptide or tau protein, which aggregate to form AD pathology. To translate our findings back to human AD, we developed and deployed oligogenic risk scores based on gene clusters with shared nervous system phenotypes in flies, pinpointing functional pathways that differentially drive AD risk. Our results—available online via the Alzheimer’s Locus Integrative Cross-species Explorer (alice.nrihub.org)—reveal novel nervous system requirements for dozens of AD risk genes and may enable dissection of causal heterogeneity in AD. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00