Intro
Obesity is a major health problem worldwide, affecting approximately 13% of
the global population. The prevalence of obesity has been increasing steadily over
the past few decades and has nearly doubled in many countries around the world
( Nguyen & El-Serag, 2010 ; Bray et al., 2017 ). This trend has been
attributed to changes in dietary habits and physical activity levels, as well as
other lifestyle and environmental factors. According to the World Health
Organization (WHO), globally, the prevalence of obesity has tripled since 1975, with
over 650 million adults classified as obese in 2016 ( Bayat et al., 2022 ).
In the United States, the prevalence of obesity has also been on the rise. According
to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the prevalence of obesity among
adults in the United States was 30.5% in 1999–2000, and it increased to
42.4% in 2017–2018. In children and adolescents, the prevalence of obesity
has also increased from 13.9% in 1999–2000 to 19.3% in 2017–2018.
Similarly, in Europe, the prevalence of obesity has been increasing over the past few
decades. According to the European Association for the Study of Obesity, the
prevalence of obesity in Europe increased from 11% in 1990 to 23% in
2015 ( Bray et al., 2017 ).
The increase in obesity prevalence has significant implications for public health, as
it is a major risk factor for a range of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular
disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Additionally, obesity has
negative impacts on mental health, reproductive health, and quality of life.
Therefore, effective interventions to prevent and treat obesity are crucial to
reducing the burden of obesity-related diseases and improving overall health
outcomes ( Yanovski & Yanovski,
2014 ). Obesity among women is a growing concern and a significant public
health issue. In the United States, more than 40% of women are classified as
obese where the prevalence of obesity is even higher among certain subgroups of
women, such as those with lower income and education levels ( Flegal et al., 2016 ).
Obesity is associated with a range of comorbidities, including cardiovascular
disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer ( Kheirvari et al., 2020 ). Obesity also has a negative impact
on fertility, with both men and women experiencing decreased fertility rates ( Gautam et al., 2023 ). The mechanisms
underlying the effects of obesity on fertility are complex and multifactorial, but
alterations in reproductive hormones have been implicated ( Zia, 2023 ). Bariatric surgery has emerged as an effective
treatment for obesity, with studies reporting significant weight loss and
improvements in metabolic health ( Maxwell et al.,
2023 ).
Women’ s reproductive function is governed by a complex interplay of
biological factors. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis plays a crucial role in
regulating the menstrual cycle and female fertility. The hypothalamus secretes
gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which stimulates the pituitary gland to
release follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). These
hormones, in turn, stimulate the ovaries to produce estrogen and progesterone, which
regulate the growth and development of the endometrium and the menstrual cycle. In
addition to hormonal regulation, the female reproductive system is influenced by a
variety of biological factors, including genetics, age, nutrition, stress, and
environmental exposures. Understanding the intricate interplay between these factors
is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive disorders, such as
infertility, endometriosis, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) ( Cantley et al., 2023 ).
Obesity can have a significant impact on the hormonal balance that regulates
women’ s reproductive function. In obese women, increased levels of adipose
tissue can lead to an excess production of estrogen, which can disrupt the delicate
balance of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. This can result in elevated
levels of FSH and LH, which can negatively affect ovulation and menstrual
regularity. Additionally, obesity can also lead to insulin resistance and
hyperinsulinemia, which are key features of PCOS, a common cause of infertility in
women. PCOS is characterized by hormonal imbalances, including elevated levels of
androgens, LH, and insulin, and reduced levels of FSH. Finally, obesity can also
disrupt the production of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which regulates the
secretion of FSH and LH, leading to further hormonal imbalances that can affect
women’ s reproductive health ( Medenica et
al., 2023 ). There is some evidence to suggest that there may be a
relationship between endometriosis and obesity. Several studies have found that
women who are obese or overweight may have a lower risk of developing endometriosis
than women who are of normal weight ( Bellver et
al., 2021 ; Liu et al., 2021 ;
Bahall et al., 2023 ).
The last but not least, numerous studies have demonstrated the existence and function
of adipokines and their receptors in the female reproductive system of various
species. These adipokines are responsible for regulating processes such as ovarian
steroidogenesis, oocyte maturation, and embryo development.
Understanding how obesity-related hormonal changes may help identify potential health
risks, best treatment approaches as well as understanding how these hormones affect
fertility, reproductive health, bone health, mood and mental health, and
gynecological cancers in the population of women with obesity.
This study aims to explore the impact of bariatric surgery on reproductive hormones,
including sex hormones, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and adipokines. The
available evidence suggests that bariatric surgery may lead to significant changes
in reproductive hormone levels, which could have important implications for
fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
Results
The sample size calculation resulted in the following number of participants required
to achieve different levels of confidence in estimating the frequency of the outcome
factor in the population. For a 95% confidence level, the required sample
size was 87, while for a 99.99% confidence level, the required sample size
was 342. The population size for the calculation was 10,000,000, and the
hypothesized % frequency of the outcome factor in the population was
6% with a confidence interval of 5%. A total of 174 participants were
included in the study, with 87 participants in the bariatric surgery group and 87
participants in the control group. Table 2
shows the baseline characteristics and hormonal levels of the participants in both
groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age,
BMI, FSH, LH, estrogen, progesterone, leptin, and adiponectin. Both groups had a
similar distribution of age, BMI, hormonal levels, and comorbidities. Weight lost
data demonstrate that the outcomes after surgery and the information of individuals
in control group without significant changes in weight and BMI during the survey
( Table 3 ).
PCOS and endometriosis are represented as the number of participants with
each condition in each group and excluded from study before reaching to
174 individuals in both populations of bariatric surgery and control
groups.
n, sample size.
BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing
hormone; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
BS, bariatric surgery; BMI, body mass index; EWL, excessive weight loss; NA,
not applicable.
Table 4 shows the comparison of hormonal
levels in the bariatric surgery group and control group at 3 and 6-months follow-up.
The mean levels of FSH, LH, estrogen, and progesterone in each group are
reported.
Indicates statistically significant difference
( p <0.05) between the bariatric surgery group and
the control group. FSH and LH levels were significantly increased in the
bariatric surgery group compared to the control group at both 3-month
and 6-month follow-up periods, while there was no significant difference
in estrogen and progesterone levels between the two groups at 3-month
and both time points, respectively. While there is a significant
decrease in estrogen levels in the bariatric surgery group at 6 months
follow-up compared to baseline ( p <0.001) and
compared to the control group at 6 months. However, as we mentioned,
there is no significant difference between the groups at baseline or at
3 months follow-up.
FU, follow-up; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing
hormone.
At the 3-month follow-up, the mean level of FSH was significantly higher in the
bariatric surgery group (10.4±3.2 mIU/mL) compared to the control group
(8.1±2.5 mIU/mL) ( p =0.002). Similarly, the mean level of LH
was significantly higher in the bariatric surgery group (6.2±2.1 mIU/mL)
compared to the control group (4.8±1.6 mIU/mL) ( p =0.01).
There was no significant difference in the mean levels of estrogen and progesterone
between the two groups at the 3-month follow-up.
At the 6-month follow-up, the mean level of FSH was significantly higher in the
bariatric surgery group (11.6±3.5 mIU/mL) compared to the control group
(8.3±2.8 mIU/mL) ( p =0.001). The mean level of LH was also
significantly higher in the bariatric surgery group (6.8±2.3 mIU/mL) compared
to the control group (4.9±1.7 mIU/mL) ( p =0.009). There was
no significant difference in the mean levels of progesterone between the two groups
at the 6-month follow-up. However, the mean level of estrogen was significantly
lower in the bariatric surgery group (58.3±12.9 pg/mL) compared to the
control group (76.9±11.8 pg/mL) ( p <0.001).
The results of this study suggest that bariatric surgery is associated with an
increase in FSH and LH levels at both 3-month and 6-month follow-up periods compared
to the control group. Additionally, the bariatric surgery group showed a significant
decrease in estrogen levels at the 6-month follow-up compared to both baseline and
the control group at 6 months. It is worth noting that there was no significant
difference in estrogen and progesterone levels between the two groups at baseline or
at the 3-month follow-up period.
Conclusion
To summarize, our study suggests that bariatric surgery has a significant impact on
hormonal levels in women with obesity, particularly on FSH and LH levels. These
findings demonstrate the importance of monitoring hormonal levels in women who
undergo bariatric surgery, especially those who may wish to conceive after surgery.
Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to
confirm our findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind the observed
changes in hormonal levels after bariatric surgery.
Discussion
This prospective study aimed to shed light on the impact of bariatric surgery on
hormonal levels in women with obesity compared to the control group which consists
of women with same BMI who did not underwent bariatric surgery. Our findings suggest
that bariatric surgery has a significant impact on the hormonal levels of women with
obesity, particularly on FS) and LH levels.
On the other side, steroid sex hormones and pituitary hormones such as FSH and LH in
women with obesity is crucial for several reasons. Obesity is associated with a
range of health issues, such as increased risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes,
and certain types of cancer. Understanding the changes in the above-mentioned
hormones can help identify potential interventions to mitigate these risks. Sex
hormones play a significant role in regulating the menstrual cycle and fertility,
which mostly would be disrupted in women with obesity. In addition, obesity is
strongly linked to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Changes in pituitary
hormones like growth hormone and TSH can affect metabolic health. Identifying these
changes can guide treatment strategies to improve insulin sensitivity and manage
metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, hormonal imbalances, especially low estrogen
levels, can contribute to reduced bone density and an increased risk of osteoporosis
in obese women. Moreover, hormonal fluctuations can impact mood and mental
well-being. Understanding how obesity-related hormonal changes may affect mental
health can lead to better management and support for individuals dealing with both
obesity and mood disorders. Also, increased risk of gynecological cancers, weight
management and treatment approaches are other reasons that emphasis the importance
of studying these hormones. Better understanding of sex hormones in women with
obesity plays a key role in providing the most efficient treatment.
The results of our study illustrated that both FSH and LH levels significantly
increased in the bariatric surgery group compared to the control group at both
3-month and 6-month follow-up periods. These findings are consistent with previous
studies that have reported similar results, suggesting that bariatric surgery can
increase the levels of gonadotropins in women with obesity ( Escobar-Morreale et al., 2017 ; Bhandari et al., 2022 ; Buyukkaba et al., 2022 ).
Interestingly, we did not observe any significant difference in estrogen and
progesterone levels between the bariatric surgery group and the control group at
3-month and 6-month follow-up periods. This finding is controversial since it is in
line with some studies ( Micic et al., 2022 )
and in contrast to previous studies that have reported a significant increase in
estrogen levels after bariatric surgery in women ( Raghavendra Rao et al., 2011 ; Crafts et
al., 2022 ) and also in men’ s population ( Lee et al., 2019 ). However, our study had a relatively small
sample size, only focused on female gender, and future studies with larger sample
sizes may be needed to confirm our findings.
We also found a significant decrease in estrogen levels in the bariatric surgery
group at 6 months follow-up compared to baseline ( p <0.001)
and compared to the control group at 6 months. While there is no significant
difference between the groups at baseline or at 3 months follow-up, this decrease in
estrogen levels in the bariatric surgery group may be attributed to the significant
weight loss achieved after surgery. Previous studies have reported that weight loss
can increase the levels of estrogen in women ( Leenen et al., 1994 ).
These findings have important implications for understanding the effects of bariatric
surgery on the hormonal changes that can affect reproductive health. The observed
increase in FSH and LH levels after bariatric surgery may be related to changes in
body weight and fat distribution. Bariatric surgery is known to cause rapid weight
loss, which may have an impact on the levels of these hormones. The findings of this
study are also consistent with previous research on the effects of bariatric surgery
on reproductive health as we mentioned previously. Several studies have reported
improvements in menstrual irregularities, fertility, and hormonal profiles after
bariatric surgery. The present study adds to this body of research by providing a
detailed analysis of the changes in specific hormones over time. However unresolved
obesity after bariatric surgery may result in interference in such study which were
not applicable in our survey since the mean BMI and wight lost after surgery were
significantly lower and in line with the outcomes in the literature. However
unresolved obesity after bariatric surgery can be due to factors such as
non-compliance with postoperative guidelines, psychological issues, metabolic
variations, surgical complications, genetics, hormonal imbalances, inadequate
follow-up care, poor dietary choices, socioeconomic factors, age-related changes,
medications, and altered gut microbiome. A personalized, multidisciplinary approach
is essential to address these factors and optimize weight loss outcomes in affected
individuals.
Our study has several limitations that need to be considered. First, the sample size
was relatively small, which limits the generalizability of our findings. Second, our
study only included women and Iranian ethnicity, and future studies should
investigate the effects of bariatric surgery on hormonal levels in men with obesity
( Di Vincenzo et al., 2018 ; Samavat et al., 2018 ). Third, we did not
measure other hormones such as testosterone, cortisol, and insulin, which are known
to be affected by bariatric surgery. Finally, we only measured hormonal levels at
two time points (3 months and 6 months) after surgery, and future studies should
investigate the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on hormonal levels ( Shah et al., 2006 ) to fully understand the
mechanisms underlying these effects and to develop effective interventions to
improve reproductive health outcomes in individuals undergoing bariatric
surgery.
Materials | Methods
The sample size for this study on the effect of bariatric surgery on reproductive
hormones was determined using a frequency of 6% and a confidence level of
95%. Based on these parameters, a total of 174 females were recruited for
the study, with 87 females in the target group who underwent bariatric surgery
and 87 females in the control group who did not undergo surgery.
The sample size calculation was performed using a standard formula for
calculating sample size for a two-group comparison of proportions:
Using these parameters, the calculated sample size for each group was 82.5. To
ensure adequate power, a total of 174 females were recruited, with 87 females in
each group. This sample size provides sufficient power to detect a clinically
significant difference in reproductive hormone levels between the two groups
( Table 1 ).
Results from OpenEpi, Version 3, open source
calculator—SSPropor.
This prospective study was conducted at Arman International Hospital between
October 2022 and March 2023. The study included 174 female participants, with 87
participants in the bariatric surgery group and 87 participants in the control
group. Participants in the bariatric surgery group underwent sleeve gastrectomy,
while participants in the control group visited the clinic as a candidate of
sleeve gastrectomy but did not undergo any weight loss surgery. The same
criteria for selecting main group was considered for control group and they did
not receive any other treatment for weight loss.
Participants were recruited through advertisements in the clinic center.
Interested participants were screened for eligibility criteria, which included
age between 18–45 years, a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35
kg/m 2 , and no history of non-obesity-related reproductive disorders
or hormonal treatment. Participants who met the eligibility criteria were
provided with written informed consent before enrollment in the study.
Baseline data were collected before surgery or the start of the study for the
control group. The baseline data collection included a medical history, physical
examination, and blood samples for measurement of reproductive hormone levels
(including FSH, LH, estrogen, progesterone, endometriosis, and PCOS) and
adipokines (including leptin and adiponectin). Participants in the bariatric
surgery group underwent follow-up measurements at 3, and 6 months after surgery,
while participants in the control group underwent follow-up measurements at the
same time intervals.
Blood samples were collected from participants in the morning, after an overnight
fast, and during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle for
participants with regular menstrual cycles. For participants with irregular
menstrual cycles, blood samples were collected at the same time interval. Blood
samples were collected in vacutainer tubes and centrifuged to obtain serum or
plasma, which were sent to diagnostic laboratory for further analysis.
The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on laparoscopic findings, which were
conducted as part of routine medical care. Participants who were diagnosed with
endometriosis during the study were excluded from the analysis.
Data were collected and managed using a secure electronic database. The data were
de-identified and kept confidential throughout the study. All participants
provided informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. The study
adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and
ensured the privacy and confidentiality of the participants’ data.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the baseline characteristics of the
study participants. Continuous variables were reported as means±SD and
categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages.
To assess the differences between the bariatric surgery group and the control
group in terms of changes in hormonal levels over time, a mixed effects linear
regression model was fitted. The outcome variables were FSH, LH, estrogen, and
progesterone levels measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up. The
main predictor variable was the treatment group (bariatric surgery vs. control),
and the time since baseline was included as a continuous variable. Age and BMI
were included as covariates in the models.
The mixed effects models allowed for the estimation of the average differences in
hormonal levels between the bariatric surgery group and the control group at
each time point, as well as the changes in hormonal levels within each group
over time. The models also accounted for the correlation between repeated
measures within the same individual.
To assess the significance of the treatment effect (i.e., the difference in
hormonal levels between the bariatric surgery group and the control group), Wald
tests were performed on the estimated coefficients of the treatment group
variable.
All statistical analyses were conducted using the R software version 4.0.2 (R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and a
p -value of <0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.