Full text
76,580 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Insights into global antimicrobial resistance dynamics through the sequencing of enteric bacteria from U.S. international travelers | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Insights into global antimicrobial resistance dynamics through the sequencing of enteric bacteria from U.S. international travelers View ORCID Profile Sushmita Sridhar , Colin J Worby , Ryan A Bronson , View ORCID Profile Sarah E Turbett , Elizabeth H Oliver , Terrance Shea , Sowmya R Rao , Vanessa Sanchez , Margaret V Becker , Lucyna Kogut , View ORCID Profile Damien Slater , Jason B Harris , Maroya Spalding Walters , Allison Taylor Walker , Mark C Knouse , View ORCID Profile Daniel T Leung , Paul Kelly , View ORCID Profile Edward T Ryan , Regina C LaRocque , View ORCID Profile Ashlee M Earl doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.27.635056 Sushmita Sridhar 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 3 Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sushmita Sridhar Colin J Worby 4 Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ryan A Bronson 4 Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sarah E Turbett 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 5 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sarah E Turbett Elizabeth H Oliver 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Terrance Shea 4 Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sowmya R Rao 6 MGH Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 7 Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Vanessa Sanchez 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Margaret V Becker 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lucyna Kogut 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Damien Slater 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Damien Slater Jason B Harris 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 8 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Maroya Spalding Walters 9 Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Allison Taylor Walker 10 Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mark C Knouse 11 Division of Infectious Diseases, Lehigh Valley Health Network , Allentown, PA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Daniel T Leung 12 Division of Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel T Leung Paul Kelly 13 Division of Infectious Diseases, Bronx Care Center , Bronx, NY, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Edward T Ryan 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 3 Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 14 Travelers’ Advice and Immunization Center, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Edward T Ryan Regina C LaRocque 1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA 3 Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 14 Travelers’ Advice and Immunization Center, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ashlee M Earl 4 Infectious Disease and Microbiome Program, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, MA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ashlee M Earl For correspondence: aearl{at}broadinstitute.org Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent threat to public health, but gaps in surveillance limit the detection of emergent novel threats and knowledge about the global distribution of AMR genes. International travelers frequently acquire AMR organisms, and thus may provide a window into AMR dynamics in otherwise poorly monitored regions and environments. To assess the utility of travelers as global AMR sentinels, we collected pre- and post-travel stool samples from 608 travelers, which were screened for the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and mcr -mediated colistin-resistant Enterobacterales. A total of 307 distinct AMR organisms were sequenced in order to determine genotypic patterns and their association with travel region and behavior. Travel-associated AMR organisms were overwhelmingly E. coli , which exhibited considerable phylogenetic diversity regardless of travel region. However, the prevalence of resistance genes varied by region, with bla CTX-M-55 and bla CTX-M-27 significantly more common in travelers returning from South America and South-Eastern Asia, respectively. Hybrid assembly and plasmid reconstruction revealed the genomic neighborhood of bla CTX-M-55 frequently matched a motif previously linked to animal populations. Contact with animals was also associated with virulence factors in acquired AMR organisms, including carriage of the ColV plasmid, a driver of avian pathogenic E. coli . We identified novel variants of the mcr-1 gene in strains acquired from Western Africa, highlighting the potential for traveler surveillance to detect emerging clinical threats. Ongoing efforts to track travel-acquired organisms could complement existing global AMR surveillance frameworks. Importance We collected pre- and post-travel stool samples from 608 U.S. international travelers, which were screened for the presence of three clinically relevant antimicrobial-resistant organisms, with the goal of understanding the utility of travelers as sentinels for emerging AMR and identifying regional resistance patterns. We sequenced 307 organisms and uncovered significant diversity and geographic heterogeneity in AMR organisms. We found significant differences in certain resistance gene alleles of travelers returning from South America and South-Eastern Asia, traveler contact with animals associated with virulence factors, including a plasmid that is a known driver of avian pathogenic E. coli , and novel variants of the colistin resistance mcr-1 gene in strains acquired from Western Africa. This work emphasizes the value of monitoring international travelers as a proxy for understanding AMR patterns globally and could be an important addition to existing global AMR surveillance frameworks. Introduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health concern, with recent estimates showing that approximately 5 million deaths in 2019 were associated with drug resistant infections ( 1 ). One of the drivers of AMR is overuse of antimicrobials in the hospital and community, which spill over into the environment ( 2 , 3 ). Global differences in antibiotic administration and bacterial transmission rates have contributed to a highly heterogeneous AMR burden worldwide, with higher rates of AMR infections in many lower- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and rates are predicted to increase ( 4 ); ( 1 ). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) are considered particularly problematic, as over 60% of antimicrobials used are beta-lactams ( 5 , 6 ). The ability to detect the emergence and spread of novel AMR threats is hampered by limited surveillance in many parts of the world ( 7 ) with genomic surveillance in particular predominantly occurring in healthcare settings in wealthy countries. International travel is a risk factor for acquisition of AMR organisms (AMROs) ( 8 ) and plays a role in the global spread of antibiotic resistance genes ( 9 ). However, several recent studies of international travelers have identified ESBL-PE acquisition rates of up to 60%, depending on travel destination and traveler behavior ( 10 – 12 ); ( 13 ). By inadvertently sampling from microbial reservoirs, including food, water and environmental sources in diverse global destinations, travelers may act as sentinels for the emergence and spread of novel AMR threats. Genomic surveillance of travelers could thus provide a proxy insight into global AMR dynamics. Investigations to date of ESBL-PE from travelers have typically involved culturing organisms from stool on selective media to profile for specific AMR, followed by targeted PCR-based assessment of genetic resistance factors such as beta-lactamase and carbapenemase genes ( 12 , 14 – 16 ). Few studies have explored in detail the genetic features and phylogenetic patterns of travel-acquired multidrug resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales that might be relevant for understanding dissemination of novel AMR genes and virulence factors ( 17 , 18 ). While some recent studies have sequenced isolates from travelers, these have been small in scale ( 19 – 21 ), focused on specific travel destinations ( 18 , 22 , 23 ), or been restricted to symptomatic individuals post-travel ( 24 – 27 ). Previously, in an untargeted metagenomic analysis of stool samples from U.S. international travelers, we identified widespread acquisition of E. coli strains across a range of destinations, as well as a significant increase in the prevalence of AMR genes ( 28 ). However, due to the complexity and limited resolution of metagenomic sequence data, we were unable to identify specific AMR gene alleles with nucleotide-level accuracy, or to link genes with their plasmid or chromosomal hosts; such data are essential to tracking AMR gene spread via clonal dissemination or horizontal gene transfer. In this study, we sequenced and analyzed 307 AMRO isolates across three resistance phenotypes (ESBL-PE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and mcr -mediated colistin-resistant Enterobacterales (mcr-E)) collected before and after international travel from our previously described cohort of U.S. travelers ( 28 ). In this study we sought to assess the utility of travelers as ‘global sentinels’; specifically, determining what regional AMR trends and emerging threats could be identified from whole genome sequencing of travel-acquired bacteria, and what this information can tell us about local microbial reservoirs. Our findings revealed geographic patterns of AMR gene prevalence, associations between traveler behavior and presence of virulence factors, and highlighted the role of plasmids in disseminating risk-associated genes both locally and globally. Our study demonstrates that traveler genomic surveillance could complement existing efforts to monitor the global prevalence and spread of AMR. Results We recruited 608 travelers at US travel clinics between 2017 and 2020, collecting stool samples before and after international travel ( Methods ). Stool samples were screened for three target AMROs: ESBL-PE, CRE and mcr-E. As described in our previous study ( 29 ), 6.6% (40/608) of travelers were colonized with an AMRO before travel, and 38% (217/568) of those not colonized prior to travel returned with at least one AMRO, most often an ESBL-PE (98%, 212/217) ( Figure 1 ). There was considerable regional variability in AMRO acquisition rates across the six travel regions investigated. Here, we sequenced 394 AMROs from 203 participants from this study, including from 186/217 (86%) of travelers with travel-acquired organisms. To capture multi-strain acquisition, we sequenced multiple strains from single stool samples where morphologically distinct organisms were identified in growth on selective media (66 stool samples had more than one distinct sequenced isolate; Methods ). To avoid overrepresentation of acquired strains, we filtered out 86 isolates which were highly similar to others collected from the same individual (below a 50 SNP cutoff; Methods), leaving a total of 307 isolates for analysis. Long read sequence data were additionally generated for the first 216 (70%) isolates collected. The majority of isolates (292/307, 95%) were E. coli , and most were ESBL-PE (285/307; 92.8%) ( Table 1 , Supplementary Data ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Global acquisition rates of AMR organisms. For the six most common travel regions, pie charts represent the proportions of travelers who returned carrying ESBL-PE and/or mcr-E. Regions are defined by the United Nations Statistics Division ( Methods ), and acquisition rates are calculated for the entire cohort of 608 travelers. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Summary of traveler isolates. Travel-acquired AMR organisms are phylogenetically distinct from pre-travel strains We first examined phylogenetic diversity of isolates belonging to the most common species, E. coli , to assess whether travel-acquired organisms reflected regional differences in strain type prevalence. Based on phylogroup, travel-acquired isolates were distinct from isolates carried pre-travel (p=5.3e-9, Chi-squared test); in particular, phylogroup B2 represented 43% (17/40) of pre-travel isolates, but only 7% (18/252) of travel-acquired isolates ( Figure 2 ). Sequence type (ST) 131 within phylogroup B2 was overrepresented in pre-travel strains (OR=5.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 14.9; p=8e-5). Phylogroups A and B1 predominated post-travel (162/252; 64%). There were few differences in phylogroup distribution between travel regions among the post-travel isolates. While we observed that phylogroup D E. coli were slightly more common among isolates associated with travel to South-Eastern Asia (11/43, 26% vs. 11% in other travel regions; OR=3.1 (1.2, 7.4); Figure 2B ), this was not significant after multiple testing correction (false discovery rate (FDR)=0.24)). Travel associated isolates exhibited considerable ST diversity; none of the three STs with more than 10 isolates were significantly overrepresented in any travel region. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Phylogenetic distribution of acquired AMR E. coli . The phylogroup designation for all 292 E. coli isolates is compared (a) between pre-travel and post-travel, and (b) between each of the most common travel regions. (c) The phylogenetic tree is shown for all 292 E. coli isolates. Branches are colored and labeled by phylogroup. Acquired ESBL resistance mechanisms vary by travel region and environmental exposures Although we observed little phylogenetic clustering by travel region, suggesting a limited role of specific bacterial lineages in driving local AMR prevalences, we hypothesized that horizontal gene transfer in E. coli might allow AMR genes to proliferate regionally on diverse genetic backgrounds. We therefore evaluated the resistance mechanisms associated with the observed resistance phenotypes to identify any geographic associations. Most ESBL-PEs carried a bla CTX-M gene, including 96% (43/45) of pre-travel isolates and 97% (232/240) of post-travel isolates ( Figure 3a ). The most common allele in both pre- and post-travel samples was bla CTX-M-15 , though the CTX-M allele distribution varied by geography. Compared to other travel regions, bla CTX-M-27 was significantly more common in isolates associated with South-Eastern Asia (OR=4.3 (95% CI: 1.7, 10.6); FDR=0.0034). bla CTX-M-55 was observed more frequently in isolates associated with South America (OR=7.9 (95% CI: 3.2, 19.7), FDR=2.8e-5) and South-Eastern Asia (OR=3.0 (95% CI: 1.1, 7.7), FDR=0.06), though the latter did not reach significance after multiple testing correction ( Figure 3b ). These findings are concordant with previous studies describing the expansion of bla CTX-M-27 in South-Eastern and Eastern Asia ( 29 , 30 ) and the global prevalence of bla CTX-M-55 ( 31 ). There were ten non- bla CTX-M ESBL-PE isolates, seven of which were collected from travelers returning from India. Resistance mechanisms in these isolates varied, including bla CMY (n=5) and bla SHV (n=3). Two unrelated E. coli isolates had no identified ESBL gene; resistance in these isolates was potentially mediated by ampC mutations. Two travelers acquired CRE during travel after visiting South-Eastern Asia (phylogroup C E. coli ) and Southern Asia (phylogroup F E. coli ); both isolates carried bla NDM-5 and bla CTX-M-15 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Resistance alleles show geographic heterogeneity. Genes mediating the observed resistance phenotypes are broken down by travel region. (a) Relative proportion of ESBL genes by region. The four most common CTX-M alleles are shown. Total counts are given above bars; counts exceed the number of ESBL organisms due to multiple ESBL gene carriage in 3 isolates (Supplementary Data). (b) mcr gene counts by region. Hatched region indicates one isolate carrying both mcr-1 and mcr-3 . mcr-1 variants differ from mcr-1.1 by a single mutation. We next looked for positive associations between self-reported traveler behavior (see questionnaire, Supplemental Text) and ESBL gene carriage in post-travel isolates to assess potential sources of acquisition. Isolates collected from travelers who reported contact with animals, eating raw or undercooked fish, and eating food from a street vendor were significantly more likely to carry bla CTX-M-55 , but none of these behaviors were significantly associated after adjusting for travel destination ( Table 2 ). Isolates collected from travelers who reported drinking unpurified water were significantly more likely to carry bla CTX-M-27 ; this remained significant in multivariable regression after adjusting for travel destination (OR=3.33, 95% CI: 1.48, 7.44; p=0.0034). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. ESBL genes associated with traveler activities. ESBL genes with significant univariable associations to traveler activities are listed with estimated odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. Only travel-acquired ESBL isolates are considered (n=240). Regression results are also provided for models adjusting for travel destination. In concordance with its known carriage on plasmids ( 31 ), bla CTX-M-55 was distributed broadly across the E. coli tree; at most, three bla CTX-M-55 -carrying strains clustered within a common sequence type. In contrast, almost half (13/27; 48%) of bla CTX-M-27 -carrying strains belonged to ST131 (OR=7.3 (95% CI: 2.9, 18.7); p=9.3e-6), corresponding to clonal spread of a known epidemic subclade ( 32 ). Of note, the plurality of bla CTX-M-27 -carrying strains (6/13) were isolated from pre-travel samples. Diverse plasmids drive ESBL dissemination Plasmids are important drivers of AMR dissemination, which is concordant with the minimal phylogenetic association between E. coli strains and ESBL alleles observed here. To explore the role of plasmids and better characterize the genomic neighborhood of ESBL genes, we generated near complete hybrid assemblies for the 216 isolates with long read sequence data available ( Methods ). All scaffolds were classified with MOB-Suite ( 33 ) to link genes to their host plasmid or chromosome. We found considerable diversity in the plasmid types associated with ESBL genes. For instance, bla CTX-M-15 was carried on plasmids spanning at least 18 distinct MOB-Suite clusters. There was limited association between the AMR gene host plasmid group and travel region ( Figure S1a ). Chromosomal carriage was more common for bla CTX-M-14 (43%) and bla CTX-M-15 (27%), and chromosomal integration of these genes was observed across all phylogroups ( Figure S1b ). Given the association we observed between bla CTX-M-55 carriage and travel to both South America and South-Eastern Asia, we sought to determine whether horizontal transfer of the same genomic sequence could be driving its circulation in these specific global regions. Our analysis of the genomic neighborhoods surrounding each bla CTX-M-55 revealed a geographic pattern; the bla CTX-M-55 neighborhood in isolates brought back by travelers from South-Eastern Asia was commonly ISEcp1-hp- bla CTX-M-55 -hp-Tn2 (corresponding to ‘Type I’ in a previous study( 31 ), n=5/8) while isolates from travelers to South America typically followed the motif IS15- bla CTX-M-55 -hp-( bla TEM )-IS26 (‘Type II’, n=6/7) ( Figure S2 ). Previous analyses of bla CTX-M-55 contexts have shown type II to be increasing in prevalence, more common in genomes from South America, and often associated with animal sources ( 31 ). Colistin resistance gene variants and geographically localized plasmids identified among traveler samples While the majority of the targeted AMROs identified from travelers were ESBL-PE, 28 isolates were mcr-E. All were E. coli from post-travel samples, most often associated with travel to South America (n=11) and South-Eastern Asia (n=12). Three isolates carried mcr-3 , all associated with travel to South-Eastern Asia. Twenty-six carried mcr-1 , with one carrying both mcr-1 and mcr-3 ( Figure 3b ). Most travelers colonized with mcr-E post-travel were also positive for ESBL-PE (18/23; 78%), either through acquisition of multi-resistant strains exhibiting both phenotypes (n=13), or co-carriage of multiple distinct E. coli strains (n=5). Two isolates associated with travel to Western Africa (Liberia and Ghana) carried an mcr-1.1 gene with point mutations in the start codon, with retained functionality likely due to a subsequent second start codon. While start codon mutations have previously been observed in mcr-1 ( 34 ), the specific mutations observed here appeared to be rare. The variant identified in a traveler returning from Liberia (M1R) had 13 perfect matches in the NCBI nt database (as of September 2023), two collected prior to 2020, while the variant identified in a traveler returning from Ghana (M1I) had no matches. Two travelers visiting Peru in April and September 2018 returned with colistin-resistant E. coli strains, harboring highly similar IncI2 plasmids carrying mcr-1 . The 60kb and 61kb plasmids shared 59kb at 99.8% nucleotide identity with two indels. Using BLAST to search for similar sequences to the longer plasmid in public databases, we found three other plasmids with query coverage and nucleotide identity at least as high as our identified pair. All three also originated from South America (Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador), had various bacterial hosts ( K. pneumoniae , Citrobacter braakii , E. coli ), and were isolated from human urine, food, and chicken, respectively. Regional variability in additional resistance genes While we selected for ESBL-PE, CRE and mcr-E organisms in our study design, we sought to characterize additional phenotypic and genotypic features of all 307 AMRO isolates to assess other clinically relevant traits that might be associated with travel destination. We first considered resistance to other antimicrobials; all isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of 19 antibiotics ( Methods ). In addition to beta-lactams, ESBL-PE isolates exhibited non-susceptibility to additional antibiotics : most commonly tetracycline (68% of ESBL-PE isolates), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (65%) and aztreonam (64%). There was some regional variability in phenotypic AMR; gentamicin resistance was elevated in isolates associated with South-Eastern Asia (OR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.3, 7.6, FDR=0.044). Among isolates associated with travel to Southern Asia, 70% were non-susceptible to levofloxacin, higher than among isolates associated with other regions (OR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.3, 5.0; FDR=0.046) ( Figure S3 ). We additionally explored the full genotypic resistance profile, using RGI and CARD ( 35 ) to identify resistance genes in all isolates ( Methods ). Several genes were enriched in specific travel regions (Figure S4 ), often concordant with observed phenotypic patterns. Mutations in GyrA were more frequent in isolates collected from travelers to Southern Asia (OR=3.0, 95% CI: 1.5, 6.0; FDR=0.028), while aac ( 3 ) -IIa was enriched in ESBL isolates from South-Eastern Asia (OR=5.2, 95% CI: 2.0, 13.2; FDR=0.0092), contributing to the elevated resistance to fluoroquinolones and gentamicin in those regions, respectively. bla TEM-1 (OR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.5; FDR=0.035) and qnrS1 (OR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.8; FDR=0.025) were both enriched in isolates associated with Western Africa. The genes floR (32.4% vs. 3.9%; OR=11.8, 95% CI: 4.3, 32.9; FDR=7.4e-6) and fosA3 (40.5% vs. 1.8%; OR=37.1, 95% CI: 11.5, 143.1; FDR=2.0e-10), conferring resistance to phenicol and fosfomycin, respectively, were elevated in ESBL-PE isolates from travelers returning from South America. Virulence factor carriage highlights associations with ecology and traveler behavior As AMROs inhabit a range of environmental niches with differential selective pressures, we hypothesized that they may contain additional gene content providing insight into their acquisition. To assess this, we looked for enriched virulence gene carriage associated with both travel regions and traveler activities. Given the importance of E. coli as a cause of diarrhea, we first considered virulence genes used as markers for diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes ( Methods ). On this basis, most strains (70%; 208/292) were non-diarrheagenic; however, 7.5% (22/292) were enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), 10.6% (31/292) were enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and 10.9% (32/293) were diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) ( Figure S5 ). Most EAEC isolates were observed post-travel; 42% (13/31) of them were associated with travel to Southern Asia. While our previous study noted that acquisition of AMROs was associated with self-reported diarrhea during travel ( 29 ), the rate of diarrhea was not elevated among travelers acquiring any specific pathotype. Next, we broadened our search for any additional virulence and stress factors (including metal resistance genes) with geographical enrichment. The salmochelin siderophore system encoded by the gene cluster iroBCDEN was enriched in isolates associated with travel to South-Eastern Asia (iroB: OR=5.5 (95% CI: 1.8, 15.4), FDR=0.0045) and South America (iroB: OR=6.2 (95% CI: 2.1, 17.0), FDR=0.0026), while metal resistance genes (the sil , pco , and ter gene clusters, encoding resistance to silver, copper and tellurite, respectively) were enriched in isolates linked to South-Eastern Asia (silC: OR=6.1 (95% CI: 2.3, 15.9), FDR=0.0014; pcoE: OR=4.6 (95% CI: 1.5, 13.4), FDR=0.036; terD: OR=5.4 (95% CI: 1.7, 16.0), FDR=0.019) ( Figure S6 ). We next considered genes associated with travel activity, and found several virulence genes to be significantly more common in isolates collected from travelers eating street food and reporting contact with animals. These included iroBCDEN , as well as the aerobactin operon iucABCD-iutA ( Table S1 ). The genes cvaC and iss were also significantly more common in isolates from travelers reporting animal contact, and together with iroBCDEN , are among the markers for the ColV plasmid, a driver of avian pathogenic E. coli ( 35 – 39 ). We used a previously described marker-based approach to define ColV plasmids in our isolate collection ( Methods ) and found fifteen isolates (4.9%) meeting these criteria. ColV was more frequent in isolates linked to South America and in isolates associated with animal contact (OR=3.59, 95% CI: 1.14, 11.09; p=0.025, and OR=5.68, 95% CI: 1.66, 26.09; p=0.011 respectively, multivariable regression), highlighting the connection between travelers and high-risk environmental reservoirs. Having identified geographical enrichment in ColV plasmid carriage, we looked across all plasmid groups reconstructed with hybrid assembly and classified with MOB-Suite to determine if any other potentially high-risk plasmids were more common in specific regions. While most plasmid groups identified with MOB-Suite were found across several travel destinations, some exhibited geographical association, including plasmids belonging to group 430, which were significantly more common in isolates linked to South-Eastern Asia. These plasmids carried a median of 14 ARGs, including either mcr-1 or mcr-3 ( Figure 4 ). Plasmid colocation of multiple resistance genes represents elevated risk of rapid dissemination of multidrug resistance; detection of such plasmids highlights the importance of long read sequencing. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Plasmids vary in geographic distribution and ARG content. Plasmid content was identified with MOB-Suite for the 207 genomes with hybrid assemblies. (a) Frequency of the most common plasmid clusters across all isolates, with MCR gene content marked. (b) Frequency of the most common plasmid clusters across all isolates, with ESBL gene content marked. (c) ARG count distribution for each of the plasmid groups. Box plots display the interquartile range and median, as well as the 95% quantiles. (d) Heat map denoting frequency of plasmid group detection by travel region. Asterisks denote statistical significance after multiple testing correction; * FDR<0.05, ** FDR<0.005. Discussion Robust surveillance and analysis of circulating AMROs across global regions is essential for mitigating the growing challenge of AMR. While considerable efforts are underway to establish global AMR surveillance networks ( 40 ), gaps remain, and implementing an international framework to collect appropriate samples is costly, resource intensive and presents numerous logistical challenges. In contrast, surveillance of international travelers requires only local sample collection and processing yet may provide a proxy insight into global AMR dynamics, complementing existing international surveillance efforts. In this study, we conducted genomic analyses on AMR bacterial isolates acquired by international travelers to explore global diversity and to identify regional patterns of resistance and virulence gene circulation, including potential emerging threats. We found that the majority of acquired AMROs were highly diverse E. coli with limited phylogeographic signal, though many AMR and virulence genes exhibited regional enrichment, driven by local plasmid-mediated dissemination. We additionally found associations between travel-related behavior and AMR gene carriage, suggestive of environment-specific bacterial and AMR reservoirs. Several patterns identified in our study are concordant with previous analyses of global sample collections of E. coli from humans and wastewater, highlighting the utility of our indirect sampling of travelers. E. coli is known to be highly globally diverse, with limited geographic or environmental structure ( 41 ). While we found E. coli ST131 more frequently in pre-travel samples, travel-associated strains exhibited considerable diversity regardless of destination. bla CTX-M alleles are known to vary by region, and their distribution has changed over time ( 30 , 42 ), with new variants emerging ( 43 ). bla CTX-M-55 emerged in South-Eastern Asia ( 44 ), and was primarily found in Asia prior to 2017 ( 30 , 44 ). We also found several examples in travelers returning from South America, indicative of the subsequent global dissemination of this gene observed as of 2022, particularly to the Americas ( 31 ). Characterizing the genomic neighborhood of this gene provides additional insight into regional circulation. While our sample size was limited, isolates associated with South America more frequently carried bla CTX-M-55 in a ‘type II’ background, which was more common in this region, and also linked to animal populations and food sources, based on a previous study of over 2,000 bla CTX-M-55 isolates ( 31 ). Our sequencing-based approach further enabled us to find that silver and copper resistance genes were more common in isolates associated with travel to South-Eastern Asia. This could indicate increased exposure to industrial pollution ( 45 , 46 ), although further work is needed to explore the correlations of metal resistance genes and environmental contamination. Finally, our finding that animal contact was associated with elevated levels of ColV plasmid carriage in acquired AMROs is striking, given its known high prevalence among animal sources ( 47 ), and highlights the potential for future traveler surveillance efforts to link acquired genes and their associated primary reservoirs. Earlier studies of international travelers have used PCR-based methodology to examine global AMR patterns, finding similar trends in e.g. bla CTX-M-15 as the dominant ESBL gene acquired by travelers, with particularly high levels associated with travel to sub-Saharan Africa ( 14 , 48 ). However, such approaches cannot provide further insight into gene context, co-carriage of additional virulence or resistance genes, or plasmid content. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date utilizing whole genome sequencing of travel-acquired AMROs to describe AMR patterns associated with travel regions; previous sequencing studies did not attempt to identify geographic patterns due to sample size or sampling approach ( 18 – 20 , 22 – 26 ). Hybrid sequencing further allowed us to associate key genes with their diverse plasmid backgrounds. The ability to characterize the genomic context around target genes allows one to track mobile sequences across strains and plasmids and identify associations with particular environmental niches ( 49 ). Through hybrid assembly, we identified frequent resistance gene co-location on plasmids, including an mcr -carrying plasmid group associated with South-Eastern Asia harboring an average of 14 additional ARGs. Such plasmids pose a significant public health concern, and their dissemination should be monitored. Travelers acquire AMR organisms at vastly different rates depending on destination; however, the utility of travelers as sentinels to report on regional genomic landscapes has yet to be explored. Such a traveler-based approach could identify potential threats emerging in regions with limited surveillance. This is highlighted in our study with the detection of rare mutations in the mcr-1 gene in two travelers returning from Western Africa. Tracking phylogeographic patterns of clinically important genes, including mcr-1 , is essential both for monitoring dissemination pathways, and the ability to rapidly respond to emerging threats. Our study has limitations. While our isolate collection was larger than any previous study of traveler AMROs, the sample size per travel region was relatively limited, hampering the ability to estimate prevalence of genomic features with precision. This is especially true for insights into plasmids, as long-read data was not generated for all isolates. Moreover, the aggregation of travel destinations into global regions may obscure important heterogeneity between and even within specific countries. Nevertheless, we were able to detect significant differences in resistance alleles and plasmids between regions, which could be explored at a more granular level in future studies or in ongoing surveillance. By picking morphologically distinct colonies from selective media, we captured greater diversity than a standard approach of taking a single isolate per individual, though we may still be missing additional, distinct strains. Further, although we filtered out highly similar same-host isolates to prevent overrepresentation of sequence types and genes, within-host horizontal gene transfer could nevertheless result in certain genes appearing more prolific. Since all studied isolates belonged to three specific AMR phenotypes, conclusions related to phylogenetic distributions, additional gene content and plasmids are not necessarily generalizable, due to colocation or interaction with targeted resistance genes. While there have been efforts to expand global surveillance of AMR, including through multinational networks ( 50 ) and targeted community-level efforts ( 51 – 55 ), coverage remains sparse and requires extensive coordination to collect reliable samples. Given the nature of international travel, using travelers as sentinels could be an important approach to provide complementary AMR surveillance, including offering greater visibility in regions where other AMR surveillance approaches are limited. Such a framework would be ideally implemented prospectively to understand AMR trends in real time. Traveler pathogen genomic surveillance, if implemented systematically with geographic representation, could provide insight on global AMR dynamics, and importantly, provide information about global dissemination of emerging AMR threats. Methods Study design & sample collection We recruited participants at five U.S. travel clinics affiliated with Global TravEpiNet ( 56 ), located in Boston MA, New York NY, Bronx NY, Salt Lake City UT and LeHigh Valley, PA, during a pre-travel health visit, as previously described ( 29 ). Participants were aged 1-85 years, and no exclusion criteria were applied. Recruitment began in 2017 at the Boston site, and in 2018 for all other sites, and concluded in 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. Institutional review board approval was obtained from the human research committee at each participating enrollment site. Participants self-collected pre- and post-travel stool samples, which were immediately stored in Cary Blair medium and mailed to the Massachusetts General Hospital clinical microbiology laboratory. Benchmarking was performed to assess the recovery of AMR organisms under this sample collection protocol ( 57 ). Samples were screened for the presence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE), mcr -mediated colistin-resistant Enterobacterales (mcr-E) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) as previously described ( 57 , 58 ). Briefly, cultures were screened for ESBL-PE by growth on HardyCHROM ESBL (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) medium at 35°C and for CRE by either growth on McConkey agar following incubation in tryptic soy broth inoculated with a 10-µg meropenem disc (( 59 )) or growth on CHROMID CARBA (bioMerieux, Durham, NC) medium at 35°C. Colistin resistance was screened for using Luria Bertani agar containing colistin sulfate, vancomycin, and amphotericin ( 58 ). Resistant colonies were picked from the selective screening; multiple colonies were picked if there were distinct morphotypes. Recovered organisms underwent initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) against a panel of 18 antibiotics using the Vitek2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing automated system (bioMérieux, Durham, NC); ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, aztreonam, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Colistin AST was also performed using an internally validated broth microdilution panel (Sensititre, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Ceftriaxone, carbapenem, and colistin non-susceptibility was confirmed using phenotypic (ESBL-PE, CRE) or molecular (mcr-E) testing as previously described ( 58 ). Healthcare providers used structured questionnaires before travel to collect information on demographics, health, travel itineraries and activities, medications and symptoms. Travelers completed a questionnaire after travel regarding behaviors and illness while traveling (see traveler questionnaire; Supplemental Text). Whole genome sequencing DNA extraction 1 ml of a 4 ml overnight culture of each isolate grown in Luria Bertani broth was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 7500 rpm to pellet cells. The supernatant was discarded and pellets were processed using the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini kit. The only deviations from the standard protocol were that samples were not incubated at 70°C following addition of Buffer AL, and samples were eluted in 100 µl distilled water. DNA concentrations (ng/µl) were measured using a Nanodrop. Illumina sequencing Illumina whole genome paired-end libraries were prepared for a total of 393 isolates as previously described, and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2500 or HiSeq X sequencers at the Broad Institute ( 60 ). Oxford Nanopore sequencing 600 ng of DNA from each sample was used as input into the Oxford Nanopore 1D ligation library construction protocol (SQK-LSK109) following the manufacturer’s recommendation. Samples were barcoded using the Native Barcoding Expansion 1-12 kit to run in batches of between 1 and 10 samples per flow cell on a GridIon (Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd, Science Park, UK). Samples were run on flowcells FLO-MIN106D (R9.4.1) and base-called using ont-guppy-for-minknow v2.0.5. Due to resource limitations, ONT data were generated for 263 isolates, approximately representing the first two-thirds of isolates received. Sequence data analysis Assembly and annotation All Illumina short read datasets were assembled using Spades v3.11.1 ( 61 ), and annotated with Prokka v1.14.6 ( 62 ). For the subset of isolates with long read data available, genomes were assembled using UniCycler v0.4.4 ( 63 ) pipeline described previously ( 49 ), and annotated using the Broad Institute’s prokaryotic annotation pipeline, as previously described ( 64 ). Removal of duplicate isolates While colonies were selected based visually on differential morphology, some sequenced isolates from the same sample were nearly identical. To avoid overrepresentation of strains with a recent common ancestor which may represent the same exposure event, we used read-based alignment against the GenBank reference genome CP015159.1 to calculate pairwise SNP distances between all isolates. Strain pairs from the same individual separated by <50 SNPs were considered to belong to the same lineage, and one isolate was removed from further consideration. If ONT data were available for one isolate, this was retained; if isolates represented both pre- and post-travel, the pre-travel isolate was retained; otherwise, one isolate was retained at random. A total of 86 isolates were removed on the basis of this filtering, leaving 307 isolates for analysis. Post filtering, seven pairs of isolates collected from the same individual belonged to the same sequence type; the pairwise distances ranged from 500-12,000 SNPs, and most exhibited distinct antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. These isolates were therefore considered distinct and were retained for analysis. Gene identification and pathotyping Resistance genes were identified using CARD and RGI v5.5.1 ( 35 ). Virulence and stress factors were identified using AMRFinderPlus v3.11.2 ( 65 ). Pathotypes were determined based on presence of pathotype-associated virulence genes; these were determined to be those most commonly used for pathotype classification in the literature ( 66 – 68 ). Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) were defined as isolates containing genes eae or bfp ; enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) were those containing agg , aat , or aai ; diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) were those containing afa or dra ; enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) were those containing ipa ; enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) were those containing elt or est ; and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) were those containing stx . Any isolates not containing any of these genes were defined as non-diarrheagenic (non-DEC) E. coli . As previously defined ( 39 ), we considered an isolate ColV-positive if it carried at least one or more genes from four or more of the following six gene sets (i) cvaABC and cvi (the ColV operon), (ii) iroBCDEN (salmochelin), (iii) iucABCD and iutA (aerobactin), (iv) etsABC , (v) ompT and hlyF , and (vi) sitABCD . Since not all of these genes belong to the AMRFinderPlus database, we used BLAST to identify relevant hits to the Virulence Factor Database ( 69 ). Phylogenetic tree construction Core genome alignment was performed using Parsnp (Treangen et al. 2014) on all 292 E. coli isolate assemblies. Isolate GTEN_1 was used as the arbitrary ‘reference’ genome. Recombination removal and tree construction was performed using Gubbins ( 70 ) with RAxML ( 71 ). The E. coli phylogeny was visualized in iTOL ( 72 ) using midpoint rooting. Plasmid classification Plasmid content within the hybrid assemblies was classified using MOB-Suite version v1.4.9 ( 33 ). Plasmids were assessed for pairwise shared, contiguous content using ConSequences ( 49 ). Statistical analysis Travel destination was provided at country level; to increase per-destination sample size, we aggregated travel destinations into geographic regions according to the United Nations Statistics Division M49 standard (subregion level) ( 73 ). We grouped regions with fewer than 10 travelers together into an ‘Other’ category. To test for phylogroup heterogeneity between pre- and post-travel isolates, we considered the four most common phylogroups (A, B1, B2, D) and applied the chi-squared test. Associations between binary features (e.g. gene presence, plasmid presence, antibiotic non-susceptibility) and geographic region were assessed using Fisher’s exact test; odds ratios, confidence intervals and p-values were computed in R v4.2.1. Multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini Hochberg procedure. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the roles of travel destination and travel activity on gene and plasmid presence, and were fit using the glm function in R in the form glm(gene presence∼activity+destination, family=”binomial”) . Data availability Sequence data for this project is available in SRA under Bioproject PRJNA528511. Accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Data isolate_summary_table. Funding This work was supported by grants from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; grant numbers U01CK000633 and U01CK000490), and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number U19AI110818) to the Broad Institute. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Acknowledgements We thank members of the Broad Bacterial Genomics group for helpful discussions. We also thank members of the Broad Institute Microbial ‘Omics Core’ and Genomics Platform for their assistance with data generation. References 1. ↵ Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators . 2022 . Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis . Lancet 399 : 629 – 655 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Baker S , Thomson N , Weill F-X , Holt KE . 2018 . Genomic insights into the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial pathogens . Science 360 : 733 – 738 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 3. ↵ Tang KWK , Millar BC , Moore JE . 2023 . Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) . Br J Biomed Sci 80 : 11387 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Sulis G , Sayood S , Gandra S . 2022 . Antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: current status and future directions . Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 20 : 147 – 160 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ De Angelis G , Del Giacomo P , Posteraro B , Sanguinetti M , Tumbarello M. 2020 . Molecular Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Clinical Importance of β-Lactam Resistance in . Int J Mol Sci 21 . 6. ↵ Bush K , Bradford PA . 2016 . β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 6 . 7. ↵ Iskandar K , Molinier L , Hallit S , Sartelli M , Catena F , Coccolini F , Hardcastle TC , Roques C , Salameh P . 2020 . Drivers of Antibiotic Resistance Transmissionin Low- and Middle-Income Countriesfrom a “One Health” Perspective-A Review . Antibiotics (Basel) 9 . 8. ↵ Sridhar S , Turbett SE , Harris JB , LaRocque RC . 2021 . Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in international travelers . Curr Opin Infect Dis 34 : 423 – 431 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Frost I , Van Boeckel TP , Pires J , Craig J , Laxminarayan R. 2019 . Global geographic trends in antimicrobial resistance: the role of international travel . J Travel Med 26 . 10. ↵ Dao TL , Hoang VT , Magmoun A , Ly TDA , Baron SA , Hadjadj L , Canard N , Drali T , Gouriet F , Raoult D , Parola P , Marty P , Rolain J-M , Gautret P . 2021 . Acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria and colistin resistance genes in French medical students on internships abroad . Travel Med Infect Dis 39 : 101940 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. Lääveri T , Vlot JA , van Dam AP , Häkkinen HK , Sonder GJB , Visser LG , Kantele A. 2018 . Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) among travellers to Africa: destination-specific data pooled from three European prospective studies . BMC Infect Dis 18 : 341 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Arcilla MS , van Hattem JM , Haverkate MR , Bootsma MCJ , van Genderen PJJ , Goorhuis A , Grobusch MP , Lashof AMO , Molhoek N , Schultsz C , Stobberingh EE , Verbrugh HA , de Jong MD , Melles DC , Penders J. 2017 . Import and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study . Lancet Infect Dis 17 : 78 – 85 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Rodríguez-Molina D , Berglund F , Blaak H , Flach C-F , Kemper M , Marutescu L , Pircalabioru Gradisteanu G , Popa M , Spießberger B , Wengenroth L , Chifiriuc MC , Larsson DGJ , Nowak D , Radon K , de Roda Husman AM , Wieser A , Schmitt H. 2022 . International Travel as a Risk Factor for Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Large Sample of European Individuals—The AWARE Study . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 : 4758 . OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Tufic-Garutti SDS , Ramalho JVAR , Longo LG de A , de Oliveira GC , Rocha GT , Vilar LC , Dias da Costa M , Picão RC , Girão VB de C , Santoro-Lopes G , Moreira BM , Rodrigues KM de P . 2021 . Acquisition of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Enterobacterales by international travelers from a large urban setting in Brazil . Travel Med Infect Dis 41 : 102028 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. Reuland EA , Sonder GJB , Stolte I , Al Naiemi N , Koek A , Linde GB , van de Laar TJW , Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE , van Dam AP . 2016 . Travel to Asia and traveller’s diarrhoea with antibiotic treatment are independent risk factors for acquiring ciprofloxacin-resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-a prospective cohort study . Clin Microbiol Infect 22 : 731 . e1 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Leangapichart T , Tissot-Dupont H , Raoult D , Memish ZA , Rolain J-M , Gautret P . 2017 . Risk factors for acquisition of CTX-M genes in pilgrims during Hajj 2013 and 2014 . J Antimicrob Chemother 72 : 2627 – 2635 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Nakayama T , Kumeda Y , Kawahara R , Yamaguchi T , Yamamoto Y . 2018 . Carriage of colistin-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing harboring the resistance gene after short-term international travel to Vietnam . Infect Drug Resist 11 : 391 – 395 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Snaith AE , Dunn SJ , Moran RA , Newton PN , Dance DAB , Davong V , Kuenzli E , Kantele A , Corander J , McNally A . 2023 . The highly diverse plasmid population found in colonizing travellers to Laos and its role in antimicrobial resistance gene carriage . Microb Genom 9 . 19. ↵ Harada S , Suzuki M , Sasaki T , Sakurai A , Inaba M , Takuya H , Wakuda M , Doi Y . 2021 . Transmission of NDM-5-Producing and OXA-48-Producing Escherichia coli Sequence Type 648 by International Visitors without Previous Medical Exposure . Microbiol Spectr 9 : e0182721 . OpenUrl 20. ↵ Rondinaud E , Clermont O , Petitjean M , Ruppé E , Esposito-Farèse M , Nazimoudine A , VOYAG-R Study Group , Coignard B , Matheron S , Andremont A , Denamur E , Armand-Lefevre L . 2023 . Acquisition of Enterobacterales carrying the colistin resistance gene mcr following travel to the tropics . J Travel Med 30 . 21. ↵ van der Putten BCL , van Hattem JM , Penders J , Consortium C , Mende DR , Schultsz C . 2024 . Extra-intestinal pathogenic lineages of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing are associated with prolonged ESBL gene carriage . Access Microbiol 6 . 22. ↵ Kantele A , Kuenzli E , Dunn SJ , Dance DAB , Newton PN , Davong V , Mero S , Pakkanen SH , Neumayr A , Hatz C , Snaith A , Kallonen T , Corander J , McNally A . 2021 . Dynamics of intestinal multidrug-resistant bacteria colonisation contracted by visitors to a high-endemic setting: a prospective, daily, real-time sampling study . Lancet Microbe 2 : e151 – e158 . OpenUrl CrossRef 23. ↵ Moser AI , Kuenzli E , Büdel T , Campos-Madueno EI , Bernasconi OJ , DeCrom-Beer S , Jakopp B , Mohammed AH , Hassan NK , Fehr J , Zinsstag J , Hatz C , Endimiani A . 2021 . Travellers returning from the island of Zanzibar colonized with MDR Escherichia coli strains: assessing the impact of local people and other sources . J Antimicrob Chemother 76 : 330 – 337 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Boxall MD , Day MR , Greig DR , Jenkins C . 2020 . Antimicrobial resistance profiles of diarrhoeagenic isolated from travellers returning to the UK, 2015-2017 . J Med Microbiol 69 : 932 – 943 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. Terry LM , Barker CR , Day MR , Greig DR , Dallman TJ , Jenkins C . 2018 . Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Shigella dysenteriae isolated from travellers returning to the UK, 2004-2017 . J Med Microbiol 67 : 1022 – 1030 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Ingle DJ , Andersson P , Valcanis M , Wilmot M , Easton M , Lane C , Barden J , Gonçalves da Silva A , Seemann T , Horan K , Ballard SA , Sherry NL , Williamson DA , Howden BP . 2021 . Genomic Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms of Imported Typhoid in Australia . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65 : e0120021 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Habrun CA , Birhane MG , François Watkins LK , Benedict K , Bottichio L , Nemechek K , Tolar B , Schroeder MN , Chen JC , Caidi H , Robyn M , Nichols M . 2024 . Multistate nontyphoidal and Shiga toxin-producing outbreaks linked to international travel-United States, 2017-2020 . Epidemiol Infect 152 :e17. 28. ↵ Worby CJ , Sridhar S , Turbett SE , Becker MV , Kogut L , Sanchez V , Bronson RA , Rao SR , Oliver E , Walker AT , Walters MS , Kelly P , Leung DT , Knouse MC , Hagmann SHF , Harris JB , Ryan ET , Earl AM , LaRocque RC . 2023 . Gut microbiome perturbation, antibiotic resistance, and Escherichia coli strain dynamics associated with international travel: a metagenomic analysis . Lancet Microbe 4 : e790 – e799 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Worby CJ , Earl AM , Turbett SE , Becker M , Rao SR , Oliver E , Taylor Walker A , Walters M , Kelly P , Leung DT , Knouse M , Hagmann SHF , Ryan ET , LaRocque RC . 2020 . Acquisition and Long-term Carriage of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in US International Travelers . Open Forum Infect Dis 7 : ofaa543 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Bevan ER , Jones AM , Hawkey PM . 2017 . Global epidemiology of CTX-M β-lactamases: temporal and geographical shifts in genotype . J Antimicrob Chemother 72 : 2145 – 2155 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Yang J-T , Zhang L-J , Lu Y , Zhang R-M , Jiang H-X . 2023 . Genomic Insights into Global -Positive Escherichia coli Epidemiology and Transmission Characteristics . Microbiol Spectr 11 : e0108923 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Decano AG , Downing T . 2019 . An Escherichia coli ST131 pangenome atlas reveals population structure and evolution across 4,071 isolates . Sci Rep 9 : 17394 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Robertson J , Nash JHE . 2018 . MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies . Microb Genom 4 . 34. ↵ Neumann B , Rackwitz W , Hunfeld K-P , Fuchs S , Werner G , Pfeifer Y . 2020 . Genome sequences of two clinical isolates harboring the novel colistin-resistance gene variants - and - . Gut Pathog 12 : 40 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Alcock BP , Raphenya AR , Lau TTY , Tsang KK , Bouchard M , Edalatmand A , Huynh W , Nguyen A-LV , Cheng AA , Liu S , Min SY , Miroshnichenko A , Tran H-K , Werfalli RE , Nasir JA , Oloni M , Speicher DJ , Florescu A , Singh B , Faltyn M , Hernandez-Koutoucheva A , Sharma AN , Bordeleau E , Pawlowski AC , Zubyk HL , Dooley D , Griffiths E , Maguire F , Winsor GL , Beiko RG , Brinkman FSL , Hsiao WWL , Domselaar GV , McArthur AG . 2020 . CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database . Nucleic Acids Res 48 : D517 – D525 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. Smith HW . 1974 . A search for transmissible pathogenic characters in invasive strains of Escherichia coli: the discovery of a plasmid-controlled toxin and a plasmid-controlled lethal character closely associated, or identical, with colicine V . J Gen Microbiol 83 : 95 – 111 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. Cummins ML , Reid CJ , Djordjevic SP . 2022 . F Plasmid Lineages in Escherichia coli ST95: Implications for Host Range, Antibiotic Resistance, and Zoonoses . mSystems 7 : e0121221 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. de Oliveira AL , Rocha DA , Finkler F , de Moraes LB , Barbieri NL , Pavanelo DB , Winkler C , Grassotti TT , de Brito KCT , de Brito BG , Horn F . 2015 . Prevalence of ColV Plasmid-Linked Genes and In Vivo Pathogenicity of Avian Strains of Escherichia coli . Foodborne Pathog Dis 12 : 679 – 685 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Liu CM , Stegger M , Aziz M , Johnson TJ , Waits K , Nordstrom L , Gauld L , Weaver B , Rolland D , Statham S , Horwinski J , Sariya S , Davis GS , Sokurenko E , Keim P , Johnson JR , Price LB . 2018 . Escherichia coli ST131-22 as a Foodborne Uropathogen . mBio 9 . 40. ↵ Lessa FC , Sievert DM . 2023 . Antibiotic Resistance: A Global Problem and the Need to Do More . Clin Infect Dis 77 : S1 – S3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. ↵ Stoppe N de C , Silva JS , Carlos C , Sato MIZ , Saraiva AM , Ottoboni LMM , Torres TT . 2017 . Worldwide Phylogenetic Group Patterns of from Commensal Human and Wastewater Treatment Plant Isolates . Front Microbiol 8 : 2512 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Castanheira M , Simner PJ , Bradford PA . 2021 . Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection . JAC Antimicrob Resist 3 : dlab092 . OpenUrl 43. ↵ Ramadan AA , Abdelaziz NA , Amin MA , Aziz RK . 2019 . Novel blaCTX-M variants and genotype-phenotype correlations among clinical isolates of extended spectrum beta lactamase-producing Escherichia coli . Sci Rep 9 : 4224 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Kiratisin P , Apisarnthanarak A , Saifon P , Laesripa C , Kitphati R , Mundy LM . 2007 . The emergence of a novel ceftazidime-resistant CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, CTX-M-55, in both community-onset and hospital-acquired infections in Thailand . Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 58 : 349 – 355 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ Eckelman MJ , Graedel TE . 2007 . Silver emissions and their environmental impacts: a multilevel assessment . Environ Sci Technol 41 : 6283 – 6289 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 46. ↵ Chanpiwat P , Sthiannopkao S . 2014 . Status of metal levels and their potential sources of contamination in Southeast Asian rivers . Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21 : 220 – 233 . OpenUrl CrossRef 47. ↵ Reid CJ , Cummins ML , Börjesson S , Brouwer MSM , Hasman H , Hammerum AM , Roer L , Hess S , Berendonk T , Nešporová K , Haenni M , Madec J-Y , Bethe A , Michael GB , Schink A-K , Schwarz S , Dolejska M , Djordjevic SP . 2022 . A role for ColV plasmids in the evolution of pathogenic Escherichia coli ST58 . Nat Commun 13 : 683 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Lübbert C , Straube L , Stein C , Makarewicz O , Schubert S , Mössner J , Pletz MW , Rodloff AC . 2015 . Colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers returning to Germany . Int J Med Microbiol 305 : 148 – 156 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 49. ↵ Salamzade R , Manson AL , Walker BJ , Brennan-Krohn T , Worby CJ , Ma P , He LL , Shea TP , Qu J , Chapman SB , Howe W , Young SK , Wurster JI , Delaney ML , Kanjilal S , Onderdonk AB , Bittencourt CE , Gussin GM , Kim D , Peterson EM , Ferraro MJ , Hooper DC , Shenoy ES , Cuomo CA , Cosimi LA , Huang SS , Kirby JE , Pierce VM , Bhattacharyya RP , Earl AM . 2022 . Inter-species geographic signatures for tracing horizontal gene transfer and long-term persistence of carbapenem resistance . Genome Med 14 : 37 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ 2022 . Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report: 2022 . World Health Organization . https://www.who.int/pubLications/i/item/9789240062702 . Retrieved 13 January 2025. 51. ↵ Munk P , Brinch C , Møller FD , Petersen TN , Hendriksen RS , Seyfarth AM , Kjeldgaard JS , Svendsen CA , van Bunnik B , Berglund F , Global Sewage Surveillance Consortium , Larsson DGJ , Koopmans M , Woolhouse M , Aarestrup FM . 2022 . Genomic analysis of sewage from 101 countries reveals global landscape of antimicrobial resistance . Nat Commun 13 : 7251 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 52. Hendriksen RS , Munk P , Njage P , van Bunnik B , McNally L , Lukjancenko O , Röder T , Nieuwenhuijse D , Pedersen SK , Kjeldgaard J , Kaas RS , Clausen PTLC , Vogt JK , Leekitcharoenphon P , van de Schans MGM , Zuidema T , de Roda Husman AM , Rasmussen S , Petersen B , Global Sewage Surveillance project consortium , Amid C , Cochrane G , Sicheritz-Ponten T , Schmitt H , Alvarez JRM , Aidara-Kane A , Pamp SJ , Lund O , Hald T , Woolhouse M , Koopmans MP , Vigre H , Petersen TN , Aarestrup FM . 2019 . Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage . Nat Commun 10 : 1124 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. Araos R , Smith RM , Styczynski A , Sánchez F , Acevedo J , Maureira L , Paredes C , González M , Rivas L , Spencer-Sandino M , Peters A , Khan A , Sepulveda D , Wettig LR , Rioseco ML , Usedo P , Soto PR , Huidobro LA , Ferreccio C , Park BJ , Undurraga E , D’Agata EMC , Jara A , Munita JM . 2023 . High Burden of Intestinal Colonization With Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria in Chile: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) Study . Clin Infect Dis 77 : S75 – S81 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. Chowdhury F , Mah-E-Muneer S , Bollinger S , Sharma A , Ahmed D , Hossain K , Hassan MZ , Rahman M , Vanderende D , Sen D , Mozumder P , Khan AA , Sarker M , Smith RM , Styczynski A , Luvsansharav U-O . 2023 . Prevalence of Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms in Hospitalized and Community Individuals in Bangladesh, a Phenotypic Analysis: Findings From the Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) Study . Clin Infect Dis 77 : S118 – S124 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Khawaja T , Mäklin T , Kallonen T , Gladstone RA , Pöntinen AK , Mero S , Thorpe HA , Samuelsen Ø , Parkhill J , Izhar M , Akhtar MW , Corander J , Kantele A . 2024 . Deep sequencing of Escherichia coli exposes colonisation diversity and impact of antibiotics in Punjab, Pakistan . Nat Commun 15 : 5196 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ LaRocque RC , Rao SR , Lee J , Ansdell V , Yates JA , Schwartz BS , Knouse M , Cahill J , Hagmann S , Vinetz J , Connor BA , Goad JA , Oladele A , Alvarez S , Stauffer W , Walker P , Kozarsky P , Franco-Paredes C , Dismukes R , Rosen J , Hynes NA , Jacquerioz F , McLellan S , Hale D , Sofarelli T , Schoenfeld D , Marano N , Brunette G , Jentes ES , Yanni E , Sotir MJ , Ryan ET , Global TravEpiNet Consortium . 2012 . Global TravEpiNet: a national consortium of clinics providing care to international travelers--analysis of demographic characteristics, travel destinations, and pretravel healthcare of high-risk US international travelers, 2009-2011 . Clin Infect Dis 54 : 455 – 462 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Turbett SE , Becker M , Desrosiers L , Oliver E , Rao SR , Walker AT , Walters M , Ryan ET , LaRocque RC . 2021 . The effect of transport temperature and time on the recovery of antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales in stool . Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 99 : 115210 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 58. ↵ Turbett SE , Desrosiers L , Andrews-Dunleavey C , Becker M , Walker AT , Esposito D , Woodworth KR , Branda JA , Rosenberg E , Ryan ET , LaRocque R . 2019 . Evaluation of a Screening Method for the Detection of Colistin-Resistant in Stool . Open Forum Infect Dis 6 : ofz211 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ [No title] . https://www.aab.org/images/aab/pdf/2013/Klebsiella_or_Ecoli_Lab_protocol.pdf . Retrieved 13 January 2025. 60. ↵ Ribeiro FJ , Przybylski D , Yin S , Sharpe T , Gnerre S , Abouelleil A , Berlin AM , Montmayeur A , Shea TP , Walker BJ , Young SK , Russ C , Nusbaum C , MacCallum I , Jaffe DB . 2012 . Finished bacterial genomes from shotgun sequence data . Genome Res 22 : 2270 – 2277 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 61. ↵ Bankevich A , Nurk S , Antipov D , Gurevich AA , Dvorkin M , Kulikov AS , Lesin VM , Nikolenko SI , Pham S , Prjibelski AD , Pyshkin AV , Sirotkin AV , Vyahhi N , Tesler G , Alekseyev MA , Pevzner PA . 2012 . SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing . J Comput Biol 19 : 455 – 477 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Seemann T . 2014 . Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation . Bioinformatics 30 : 2068 – 2069 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 63. ↵ Wick RR , Judd LM , Gorrie CL , Holt KE . 2017 . Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads . PLoS Comput Biol 13 : e1005595 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 64. ↵ Cerqueira GC , Earl AM , Ernst CM , Grad YH , Dekker JP , Feldgarden M , Chapman SB , Reis-Cunha JL , Shea TP , Young S , Zeng Q , Delaney ML , Kim D , Peterson EM , O’Brien TF , Ferraro MJ , Hooper DC , Huang SS , Kirby JE , Onderdonk AB , Birren BW , Hung DT , Cosimi LA , Wortman JR , Murphy CI , Hanage WP . 2017 . Multi-institute analysis of carbapenem resistance reveals remarkable diversity, unexplained mechanisms, and limited clonal outbreaks . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114 : 1135 – 1140 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 65. ↵ Feldgarden M , Brover V , Gonzalez-Escalona N , Frye JG , Haendiges J , Haft DH , Hoffmann M , Pettengill JB , Prasad AB , Tillman GE , Tyson GH , Klimke W . 2021 . AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence . Sci Rep 11 : 12728 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ Pakbin B , Brück WM , Rossen JWA . 2021 . Virulence Factors of Enteric Pathogenic : A Review . Int J Mol Sci 22 . 67. Boisen N , Østerlund MT , Joensen KG , Santiago AE , Mandomando I , Cravioto A , Chattaway MA , Gonyar LA , Overballe-Petersen S , Stine OC , Rasko DA , Scheutz F , Nataro JP . 2020 . Redefining enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC): Genomic characterization of epidemiological EAEC strains . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14 : e0008613 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Denamur E , Clermont O , Bonacorsi S , Gordon D . 2021 . The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli . Nat Rev Microbiol 19 : 37 – 54 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ Liu B , Zheng D , Zhou S , Chen L , Yang J . 2022 . VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors . Nucleic Acids Res 50 : D912 – D917 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 70. ↵ Croucher NJ , Page AJ , Connor TR , Delaney AJ , Keane JA , Bentley SD , Parkhill J , Harris SR . 2015 . Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins . Nucleic Acids Res 43 : e15 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 71. ↵ Stamatakis A , Aberer AJ , Goll C , Smith SA , Berger SA , Izquierdo-Carrasco F . 2012 . RAxML-Light: a tool for computing terabyte phylogenies . Bioinformatics 28 : 2064 – 2066 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 72. ↵ Letunic I , Bork P . 2021 . Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation . Nucleic Acids Res 49 : W293 – W296 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ United Nations Statistics Division . Methodology . https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/ . Retrieved 19 January 2025 . View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted January 29, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Insights into global antimicrobial resistance dynamics through the sequencing of enteric bacteria from U.S. international travelers Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Insights into global antimicrobial resistance dynamics through the sequencing of enteric bacteria from U.S. international travelers Sushmita Sridhar , Colin J Worby , Ryan A Bronson , Sarah E Turbett , Elizabeth H Oliver , Terrance Shea , Sowmya R Rao , Vanessa Sanchez , Margaret V Becker , Lucyna Kogut , Damien Slater , Jason B Harris , Maroya Spalding Walters , Allison Taylor Walker , Mark C Knouse , Daniel T Leung , Paul Kelly , Edward T Ryan , Regina C LaRocque , Ashlee M Earl bioRxiv 2025.01.27.635056; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.27.635056 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Insights into global antimicrobial resistance dynamics through the sequencing of enteric bacteria from U.S. international travelers Sushmita Sridhar , Colin J Worby , Ryan A Bronson , Sarah E Turbett , Elizabeth H Oliver , Terrance Shea , Sowmya R Rao , Vanessa Sanchez , Margaret V Becker , Lucyna Kogut , Damien Slater , Jason B Harris , Maroya Spalding Walters , Allison Taylor Walker , Mark C Knouse , Daniel T Leung , Paul Kelly , Edward T Ryan , Regina C LaRocque , Ashlee M Earl bioRxiv 2025.01.27.635056; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.27.635056 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genomics Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7624) Biochemistry (17651) Bioengineering (13873) Bioinformatics (41887) Biophysics (21424) Cancer Biology (18566) Cell Biology (25465) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13365) Ecology (19871) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24293) Genetics (15591) Genomics (22478) Immunology (17715) Microbiology (40331) Molecular Biology (17150) Neuroscience (88492) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2828) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4817) Physiology (7635) Plant Biology (15114) Scientific Communication and Education (2044) Synthetic Biology (4286) Systems Biology (9817) Zoology (2268)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.