No convincing evidence that food processing should be included in UK dietary guidance: a comment on Dicken et al.

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Dicken et al’s trial of minimally processed vs. ultra-processed diets does not provide the evidence required to conclude that food processing should be included in UK dietary guidance. Methodological decisions by the research team resulted in diets differing in level of processing but also diets that were nutritionally mismatched in a way that can explain trial findings without the need to considering a food’s level of processing.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00