THE TREATMENT OF PELVIC INFLAMMATION

In: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · 1928 · vol. 90(3) , pp. 166 · doi:10.1001/jama.1928.02690300006002 · W1995016294
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This paper discusses the long-term consequences of treating pelvic inflammatory disease, noting that positive cervical smears can persist even after major surgery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Local symptoms of gonorrhea in the female are often so mild that the patient is unaware of her condition. When the inflammation attacks the tubes, she knows that something is wrong and presents herself for treatment. After acute symptoms subside, she considers herself well and pays no further attention to the mild local symptoms of the disease. This attitude on the part of the patient is no doubt responsible for the view that if the tubes are removed the patient will be well. This is true to some extent, but what a price to pay for a symptomatic cure. I have seen some of these patients return years after salpingo-oophorectomy and even hysterectomy, and on examination I find that the cervical smear is still positive. The end-results of conservative surgery on the tubes and ovaries have

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK