Defusing the consumption bomb

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,377 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract For decades, the “population bomb” has dominated environmental discourse, arguing that high fertility rates –especially in the low income countries– drive global environmental problems. However, current trajectories show global declines in population growth rates, especially in higher development index (HDI) nations, which have the highest consumption. Here we showcase evidence for a paradigm shift from the “population bomb” to a “consumption bomb” narrative of the Anthropocene emphasizing the central role of increases in per capita energy use and CO2 production, modulated by current standard metrics for development and affluence, in transforming the Earth system. Defusing and manoaging the consumption bomb requires rethinking economic growth and wellbeing metrics, reallocating resources toward global change retribution and mitigation, especially in low HDI countries, and transitioning from continually-increasing energy expenditures, especially from fossil fuels, toward more equitable and ecologically resilient ways of living. A new sustainability science must move beyond population counts to confront the biophysical and energetic consequences of the changing cultural, economic, and technological systems that sustain ever-growing demands on Earth’s life-support systems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00