Comment on: “The consequences of gynaecological cancer in patients and their partners from the sexual and psychological perspective”
This comment discusses the significant sexual and psychological consequences of gynecological cancer for both patients and their partners.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This short letter comments on a prior review about the sexual, psychological, and social consequences of gynecological cancer for women and their partners, agreeing the topic is important and the reviewed methodology is of interest. The authors argue that more differentiation is needed by cancer type (endometrial, cervical, ovarian, or vulvar) and by treatment modality and extent (e.g., radical surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), noting that ovarian cancer and more radical treatments are linked in the cited literature to more serious psychological and worse sexual functioning outcomes; they also state that existing studies often use heterogeneous samples, limiting reliability and reproducibility. They further emphasize that partner-related outcomes (partner sexual function, relationship satisfaction, and couple well-being) are less investigated and call for more studies, while highlighting the need for more structured assessment approaches including pre-cancer sexual function and validated questionnaires, as well as psychiatric comorbidity screening, plus clinician training in communication and support. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
6,792 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Results
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (10)
- W2030409600 via openalex
- W2112997260 via openalex
- W2157025016 via openalex
- W2167722650 via openalex
- W2192388004 via openalex
- W2259978921 via openalex
- W2336750140 via openalex
- W2486728522 via openalex
- W2514484576 via openalex
- W3024122547 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00