Materials and methods
73
Ethical clearance for animal maintenance 74
The animals used in this study were housed following the guidelines established by the Institutional 75
Animal Ethics Committee of the National Brain Research Centre (NBRC -IAEC) in India. The study 76
protocols received approval under reference numbers NBRC/IAEC/2015/172 and 77
NBRC/IAEC/2020/178. NBRC-IAEC is accredited by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and 78
Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) under the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry, 79
and Dairying, Government of India, with registration number 464/GO/ReBi-S/Re-L/01/CPCSEA. 80
C57BL/6 and CD1 mice strains were housed individually in standard cages under a 12 -hour 81
light/dark cycle (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.). The mice had ad libitum access to food and water . Environmental 82
conditions were maintained at a constant temperature of 26 ± 1°C and a humidity level of 40 ± 5%. 83
Maternal Separation 84
To induce ELS, we explored the maternal separation paradigm as a potent tool (Alves et al., 2022). 85
C57BL/6 pregnant dams were subject to random allocation, dividing them into either a control cohort 86
or a maternally separated group. A litter size of 6-8 pups was maintained. The separation started from 87
postnatal day 2 (P2) and extended until P14, with a daily separation period of 3 hours, from 0900 to 88
1200. Before each separation session, the mother was relocated to a fresh cage, while the pups were 89
transferred to a different room. The pups were gently removed from their original cage individually 90
and placed on soft cotton bedding within a glass beaker positioned on a heating pad, maintaining a 91
consistent temperature range of 36°C to 38°C. The inner wall of the glass beaker was lined with paper 92
to prevent singeing. Upon completion of the separation period, the pups were carefully returned to 93
their original cage, followed by the reintroduction of the mother . Subsequently, the animals were kept 94
under observation to ensure the mother's engagement in tending and nursing the pups. The pregnant 95
dams comprising the control group experienced minimal disruption, with cage changes occurring 96
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
once every three days, consistent across all experimental conditions. At P21, male pups were selected 97
for the harvesting of hippocampal tissue, facilitating further investigation and analysis. 98
2.3. Immunoprecipitation and dot-blot 99
To perform m 6A RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) assay, hippocampi were isolated from P21 100
C57BL/6 male mice and collected in an immunoprecipitation buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 101
7.5), 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM DTT , 0.5 µg/µl heparin, protease inhibitor (Sigma; 102
1 µl/ml), phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma; 1 µl/ml), and RNase inhibitor (SuperaseIn; 100 U/ml). The 103
hippocampi were homogenised into a single -cell suspension. Cell debris was removed by 104
centrifugation at 10,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected. 10% of the total 105
crude lysate was kept aside as total input. Simultaneously, agarose beads were prepared by washing 106
three times with wash buffer 1 (20 mM Tris -HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP -40, 0.5 107
µg/µl heparin, and RNase inhibitor) at 10,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The beads were then incubated 108
in 2.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), prepared in wash buffer 1, for 1 hour at 4°C, 50 rpm. After 109
incubation, the beads were precipitated by centrifugation at 10,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the 110
BSA solution was decanted. The collected supernatant was added to the BSA-incubated beads for pre-111
cleaning, incubating for 1 hour at 4°C, 50 rpm. The beads were then precipitated again at 10,000g for 112
5 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected and divided into two equal parts. Rabbit m6A 113
antibody was added to one half, and rabbit IgG was added to the other half, followed by incubation 114
for 4 hours at 4°C with gentle shaking. The RNA -antibody mixture was then added to agarose beads 115
pre-equilibrated in wash buffer 1 (by washing three times at 10,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C) and 116
incubated for 2 hours at 4°C, 50 rpm to allow the antibody -RNA complexes to bind to the beads. 117
Following incubation, the beads were washed twice with a high-salt wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 118
7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40, and RNase inhibitor) and then twice with a normal wash 119
buffer (20 mM Tris -HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP -40, and RNase inhibitor) to 120
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
remove non-specifically bound RNA. 1 µl of bead was used for dot-blot and the rest of the beads were 121
stored at -80 ̊C. 122
1 µl of the sample from the total input, m6A-IP , and IgG-IP was dotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. 123
The membrane was incubated in a blocking reagent (5% BSA) for 2 hours, followed by overnight 124
incubation at 4°C in a 1:1000 dilution of rabbit -m6A primary antibody. Afterwards, the membrane 125
was washed four times for 10 minutes each in 1X TBST , then incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of goat 126
anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 2 hours at room temperature. The membrane was washed again 127
four times for 10 minutes each in 1X TBST . Finally, the membrane was developed using ECL and 128
imaged with a Uvitech imager . 129
Protein Estimation and Immunoblot 130
Hippocampi were isolated from P21 C57BL/6 mice and lysed in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 131
150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease (Sigma; 132
1 µl/ml) and phosphatase (Sigma; 1 µl/ml) inhibitors. The lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 133
minutes at 4°C to pellet the debris. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was 134
determined using BCA assay. First, a series of protein standards with known concentrations was 135
prepared by diluting a stock solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA). The BCA working reagent was 136
prepared by mixing reagents A and B in a 50:1 ratio, as per the manufacturer's instructions. 137
Subsequently, 200 µL of the BCA working reagent was added to each well containing the standards 138
and samples. The plate was then incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes to allow for the colourimetric 139
reaction to develop. After incubation, the absorbance of each well was measured at 562 nm using a 140
microplate reader . The protein concentrations of the samples were determined by comparing their 141
absorbance values to the standard curve generated from the BSA standards. 142
The protein samples with 4X Laemmli buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 40% glycerol, 0.02% 143
bromophenol blue, 20% β-mercaptoethanol) were heated at 95 ̊ C for 5 minutes. Equal amounts of 144
protein were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gel and were run in running buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 145
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
0.1% SDS). 5 µg protein was loaded for Tubulin β1, 30 µg of protein was loaded for FTO, and 30 µg of 146
protein was loaded for METTL3. The proteins from the gel were transferred to a PVDF membrane 147
using a transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol) at 65 V for 90 minutes. After 148
transfer , the membrane was blocked in 5% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) in TBST (20 mM Tris -HCl, 149
pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 hour at room temperature. The membrane was incubated 150
with primary antibody against Tubulin β1 (Sigma; Anti-mouse; 1:5000), FTO (Abcam; Anti -mouse; 151
1:1000), METTL3 (Abcam; Anti -rabbit; 1:1000), diluted in blocking buffer , overnight at 4°C. The 152
membrane was washed three times, for 10 minutes each, with TBST , then incubated with HRP -153
conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody against Tubulin β1 (1:10000) and FTO (1:5000) and 154
with HRP-conjugated goat anti -rabbit secondary antibody against METTL3 (1:5000), diluted in the 155
blocking buffer for 2 hours at room temperature. The membrane was washed again for three times, 156
for 10 minutes each, with TBST . For FTO overexpression and knockdown conformations, GAPDH was 157
used as an internal control with a concentration of 1:10000 for primary (Sigma; Anti -Rabbit) and 158
1:10000 for secondary (HRP -conjugated goat anti -rabbit secondary antibody). Finally, the protein 159
bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate, and the signal was 160
captured using an imaging system (Fig. S8-S13). 161
qRT-PCR and cDNA preparation 162
P21 C57BL/6 male mice were sacrificed, and their hippocampi were harvested in 600 µl of ice -cold 163
TRIzol reagent. The tissue was triturated with an 18 mm -gauge syringe to create a single -cell 164
suspension. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 x g for 5 minutes at 4°C to pellet debris. The 165
supernatant was collected, and 300 µl of room -temperature chloroform was added and mixed 166
thoroughly. After incubating on ice for 5 minutes, the mixture was centrifuged at 18,000 x g for 15 167
minutes at 4°C to separate the aqueous phase. The aqueous layer was carefully collected, and 150 µl 168
of room-temperature isopropanol was added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was incubated at -169
80°C overnight and then centrifuged at 18,000 x g for 3 hours at 4°C to precipitate the RNA. The 170
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
supernatant was decanted, and the pellet was washed with 600 µl of 70% ethanol at room 171
temperature and centrifuged at 18,000 x g for 1 hour at 4°C. The RNA pellet was air-dried in a laminar 172
flow hood and dissolved in 20 µl of nuclease -free water warmed to 70°C. The RNA was treated with 173
DNase to ensure purity. A cDNA library was prepared using the SuperScript III cDNA preparation kit. 174
All qRT-PCR primers were made using the ENCODE database, and PCR was performed using SYBR 175
Green. 176
177
178
Table 1. qPCR primers for m6A regulators. 179
180
Cloning of FTO overexpression and knockdown vectors 181
FTO cDNA was obtained through PCR amplification from the pRK5-myc-FTO vector . The PCR product 182
included an N-terminal T2A sequence and specific overhangs. The FTO-T2A PCR product was run on 183
an agarose gel, after which the desired band was excised and purified. The purified FTO-T2A fragment 184
was then cloned into the pAAV .hSynapsin.EGFP .WPRE.bGH (Osten-Frank) vector (Penn Core Vectors: 185
p1696), which had been linearised using the AgeI restriction enzyme, through infusion cloning. To 186
propagate the recombinant vector , the Stbl3 strain of E. coli was used (Fig. S2, S12). 187
No LncRNA Forward Primer (5’ – 3’) Reverse Primer (5’ – 3’)
1 Tubulinβ-1 GCGCCTTTGGACACCTATTCA CCGCGCCCTCCGTATAGTGC
2 GAPDH CGTATTGGGCGCCTGGTCAC CGGCCTCACCCCATTTGATG
3 Hprt ACCTCTCGAAGTGTTGGATACAGG CTTGCGCTCATCTTAGGCTTTG
4 Mettl14 AGACGCCTTCATCTCTTTGG AGCCTCTCGATTTCCTCTGT
5 Mettl3 ATTGAGAGACTGTCCCCTGG AGCTTTGTAAGGAAGTGCGT
6 Alkbh5 ACAAGATTAGATGCACCGCG TGTCCATTTCCAGGATCCGG
7 Fto CTGAGGAAGGAGTGGCATG TCTCCACCTAAGACTTGTGC
8 Ythdf1 CATTATGAGAAGCGCCAGGA AGATGCAACAATCAACCCCG
9 Ythdf2 ACCAACTCTAGGGACACTCA GGATAAGGAGATGCAACCGT
10 Ythdf3 TGCACATTATGAAAAGCGTCA AGATGCGCTGATGAAAACCA
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
For FTO RNAi, two independent shRNA constructs targeting FTO (shRNA1 and shRNA2) were 188
individually cloned into the AAV-U6-sgRNA-hSyn-mCherry vector (Addgene plasmid #87916) using 189
SacI and ApaI restriction enzyme sites. The use of two distinct shRNAs minimised the likelihood of 190
off-target effects. A scrambled shRNA control was similarly cloned into the same vector to serve as a 191
negative control (Fig. S6, S13). 192
193
No. Primers Oligo sequence 5’-3’
1. Forward TGCTAGCAAGGATCCACCGGATGAAGCGCGTCCAGACCG
2. Reverse CTCACCATGGTGGCGACCGGTGGGCCGGGATTTTCCTCCACGTCCCCGCATGTTAGTA
GACTTCCCCTGCCCTCGGATCTTGCTTCCAGCAGCTG
194
Table 2. Infusion primers for insertion of FTO-t2a sequence in AAV-Synapsin-EGFP backbone. 195
No. Primers Oligo sequence 5’-3’
1. Control shRNA ATCTCGCTTGGGCGAGAGTAAG
2. FTO shRNA 1 (KD1 RNAi) AGATCGCCGCTGCATGTCA
3. FTO shRNA 2 (KD2 RNAi) GCAGCTGAAATACCCTAAACT
196
Table 3. FTO shRNA primers inserted in AAV-U6-sgRNA-hSyn-mCherry backbone. 197
198
HEK-293t cell culture and adeno-associated virus preparation 199
HEK-293t cells were grown and propagated in low -glucose DMEM solution (Gibco) with 10% fetal 200
bovine serum. Cells were maintained in incubators at 37 °C with 5% CO2. All expression vectors were 201
propagated utilising the Stbl3 strain of E. coli, while the packaging plasmids, pAAV2/9n and pDeltaF6, 202
were propagated using the DH5 α strain. Purification of the plasmid was achieved through an 203
Endotoxin-free Maxiprep kit (Qiagen). HEK293t cells underwent transfection using the purified 204
plasmid. For transfection of 2 × 10^6 cells (one 100mm plate), a mixture comprising 10 µg of the 205
chosen expression vector , 10µg pAAV2/9n, and 20µg of pAdDeltaF6 was prepared in a 206
microcentrifuge tube. To this mixture, 500 µl of 2X HBS was added, and the total volume was adjusted 207
to 1ml with nuclease -free water . 50 µl of 2.5 M calcium chloride (CaCl2) was added dropwise, 208
followed by vortexing and incubation at room temperature for 25 minutes. Post -incubation, the 209
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
mixture was added dropwise to the culture in the 100mm plate and thoroughly mixed. The culture 210
was then maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in low -glucose DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% 211
fetal bovine serum, with a single media change after 8 hours. The culture was maintained for 96 hours 212
post-media change. The addition of NaCl (final concentration 500 mM) to the plate was followed by 213
incubation at 37°C for 3 hours to lyse the cells and release the virus into the supernatant. The 214
supernatant was collected in a centrifuge tube and stored at 4°C. The remaining cells in the dish were 215
scraped and collected, undergoing a free -thaw cycle: -80°C for 30 minutes followed by 37°C for 30 216
minutes, repeated three times to ensure complete dissociation of viral particles from the cell 217
membrane. The scrapped cells and the previously collected supernatant were filtered through a 100 218
µ nylon mesh filter initially to separate the membrane debris. The resulting filtrate was further 219
filtered through a 45 µ filter , and the final filtrate was concentrated using Amicron -Ultra-15 (Merk 220
Millipore #UFC910024) filters. Virus titre determination and calculation of the multiplicity of 221
infection (MOI) were carried out by infecting 80K HEK293T cells with serially diluted AAV solutions. 222
An MOI of 1-2 was employed for subsequent experiments. 223
Primary Neuronal Culture 224
Following a previous protocol (Kaech & Banker , 2006), primary hippocampal culture was performed. 225
Pregnant CD1 dams were selected and sacrificed in a CO 2 chamber when their embryos were at the 226
E16 stage (embryonic day 16). The E16 pups were dissected out from the uterus and kept in ice-cold 227
Dissection Media for proper anaesthesia. The pups were then decapitated to extract the brain. The 228
hippocampi were dissected and collected in cold dissection media (Gibco). It was then digested with 229
the addition of 2.5% trypsin to the dissection media at 37 ̊C for 10 mins. Trypsin -treated tissue was 230
washed with dissection media thrice at room temperature and collected in Glial Minimum Essential 231
Media (GMEM; Gibco). Further , trituration was done first with an unpolished Pasteur pipette and then 232
with a fire -polished Pasteur pipette to obtain a single -cell suspension, which was plated on poly -L-233
lysine-coated 60mm dishes (1 mg/mL, Sigma) at a concentration of 200 -250 cells/mm2. The culture 234
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
was maintained at 37 ̊C, 5% CO 2 in Neurobasal Media (Gibco) with B27 supplement (Gibco) 235
throughout the experiment. Cells were infected with AAV at DIV-7 and harvested at DIV-21 for further 236
experiments. 237
Stereotaxic Surgery 238
All surgical procedures were conducted on male P30 C57BL/6 animals. Anaesthesia was induced by 239
a combination dose of Ketamine (80mg per 1kg of body weight) and Xylazine (20mg per 1kg of body 240
weight), administered via subcutaneous injections. Following anaesthesia, the fur covering the head 241
was shaved, and the animal was positioned onto the stereotaxic stage. An incision was made on the 242
skin, exposing the underlying skull. The coordinates of the Bregma were precisely determined as (X, 243
Y , Z) = (0, 0, 0), serving as a reference point. The skull was drilled to create a small aperture in the 244
cranium at the predetermined coordinates for CA1 (Anterior -0.18cm; Lateral +/ -0.19cm; Ventral -245
0.12cm relative to Bregma (0, 0, 0)). The viruses were bilaterally injected into the CA1 region at a 246
controlled rate of 0.1 µl/min, with a total volume of 0.5 µl per hemisphere. Following the injection of 247
0.25 µl, a brief 5 -minute pause was given to prevent excessive cranial pressure buildup. The syringe 248
was carefully withdrawn 10 minutes after the 0.5 µl injection and an interval of 5 minutes was 249
maintained before injection into the second hemisphere. Upon completion, the surgical site was 250
sealed, and the incision was sutured using a nylon thread. The animal was transferred to a clean cage, 251
where it was allowed to recover for 1 week. Experimental procedures were conducted 2 weeks post-252
surgery, ensuring ample recovery time. 253
Cryosectioning 254
For cryosectioning, the mouse brain was harvested and fixed using a 4% paraformaldehyde solution 255
to preserve tissue integrity. The brain was further incubated in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 256
complete fixation of tissue. Post -fixation, the brain is incubated in a 30% sucrose solution until it 257
becomes fully saturated, which takes 5-6 days. The brain is then flash -frozen using dry ice to ensure 258
rapid and uniform freezing. Using the cryostat, the frozen brain is sectioned into 50 µm thick slices, 259
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
at a maintained temperature of around -20°C. These sections are collected onto slides pre-coated with 260
gelatine to enhance tissue adherence. The slides are stored at -80°C or processed immediately for 261
further staining and microscopic examination. 262
Spatial Object Recognition Assay 263
Male C57BL/6 mice at postnatal day 50 (P50) were housed individually under standard housing 264
conditions. The mice underwent a one-week habituation period where they were gently handled for 265
2 minutes daily. The spatial object recognition assay involved five sessions, each lasting 10 minutes 266
(Leger et al., 2013; Wimmer et al., 2012). The first four sessions were training sessions conducted on 267
the same day, followed by test session 3 hours or 24 hours later . In Session 1, mice were introduced 268
to an empty arena (12 cm x 15 cm) with spatial cues such as triangular and circular markings on one 269
wall and alternating black and white stripes on another wall. This allowed the mice to explore and 270
habituate for 10 minutes. During Sessions 2 -4, two objects were placed at different locations in the 271
arena, with a 2 cm gap between each object and the arena wall, allowing the mice to explore freely 272
for 10 minutes per session. A 5 -minute interval between sessions was used to clean the arena with 273
70% ethanol to remove any odours. The training involved pairs of mice in two separate arenas 274
simultaneously. For the test session, conducted 3 hours or 24 hours after the training, one object (a 275
cylindrical glass object) in one arena was moved to a new location, while no changes were made in 276
the other arena, which served as a control. The mice were then reintroduced to their respective 277
arenas and allowed to explore for 10 minutes. All sessions were recorded using an overhead-mounted 278
Logitech HD webcam C270. The recordings were analysed using MATLAB-based software to measure 279
the time spent with each object. Movement patterns and bout counts were determined, with a bout 280
defined as an exploration of an object within a 2 cm radius, excluding climbing on the object. 281
Additionally, all analyses were manually blind-tested. 282
The discrimination index (DI) was calculated to assess the animals' ability to recognise object 283
displacement, using the formula: 284
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
DI = [time spent with object displaced - time spent with object not displaced] / [time spent with 285
displaced object + time spent with undisplaced object] 286
A positive DI indicated a preference for the displaced object, reflecting the retention of spatial 287
memory. 288
Light/Dark Box Assay 289
Male C57BL/6 mice at P42 underwent a one-week habituation period in a low-lux environment (2-5 290
Lux) (Bourin & Hascoe t, 2003; Takao & Miyakawa, 2006). Each mouse was gently habituated for two 291
minutes daily in the experimental room during this period. Throughout the study, the mice were 292
individually housed in standard cages under standard housing conditions. The experimental setup 293
included a light/dark apparatus consisting of a dark box (occupying one-third of the total exploration 294
area) and a bright box (occupying two -thirds of the total exploration area), separated by a sliding 295
door . The dark box was kept at a low light intensity of 2 Lux, while the bright box had a higher 296
intensity of 390 Lux. At the beginning of each test session, the mouse was placed in the dark box. After 297
10 seconds, the door separating the two boxes was opened, allowing the mouse to explore both 298
compartments freely for 10 minutes. To track and analyse the mouse's behaviour , a Logitech HD 299
webcam C270 was positioned overhead to record its movements. The recorded data was analysed 300
using Toxtrac, a free online software, which provided measurements such as the time spent in the 301
light box, distance travelled within the light box, transitions between compartments, etc. (Rodriguez 302
et al., 2018). 303
Puromycin incorporation assay 304
To assess global protein synthesis in primary hippocampal neurons, the Click -iT™ Plus OPP Protein 305
Synthesis Assay Kit, Alexa Fluor ™ 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), was employed following the 306
manufacturer’s protocol. Primary hippocampal neuronal cultures were prepared and maintained 307
under standard conditions. At DIV 7, neurons were transfected with 2µg FTO knockdown constructs 308
(shRNA1 and shRNA2) and Control RNAi using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). To halt 309
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
transcriptional activity, Actinomycin D (5 µg/mL) was applied to the culture media for 30 minutes at 310
37°C before OPP treatment to ensure that any newly synthesized proteins result from translation of 311
pre-existing mRNA pools. Following actinomycin treatment, neurons were incubated with O -312
propargyl-puromycin (OPP) at a final concentration of 20 µM for 30 minutes at 37°C. OPP is 313
incorporated into nascent polypeptide chains, acting as a puromycin analogue to label newly 314
synthesised proteins. After incubation, cells were gently washed with PBS and fixed with 4% 315
paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized using 0.25% Triton 316
X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes, followed by Click -iT reaction according to the manufacturer’s 317
instructions to conjugate Alexa Fluor ™ 488 azide to incorporated OPP . Nuclei were counterstained 318
and were mounted using Vectashield-DAPI. 319
Imaging 320
Fluorescence imaging was performed using a point -scanning confocal microscope (Nikon AXR). The 321
integrated OPP signal per cell was quantified using ImageJ. Images were acquired with a 60X oil 322
immersion objective (NA = 1.4) at a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels, using a step size of 0.75 µm 323
across 10 –12 z -sections per image. Fast sequential acquisition mode was used with minimum 324
spectral crosstalk. Fluorophores were excited with 405 nm (DAPI), 488 nm (OPP incorporation/GFP), 325
561 nm (mCherry), and 640 nm (MAP2/far -red) lasers. For higher -magnification imaging of 326
dendrites, a 2X optical zoom was applied with a step size of 0.5 µm. Post -acquisition, images were 327
processed using Fiji, and maximum intensity projections were generated. mCherry-positive neurons 328
were masked using MAP2 staining, and OPP intensity was measured within selected dendritic regions 329
of interest (ROIs) to assess de novo protein synthesis. The same approach was used to quantify GFP 330
intensity within the soma. 331
Analysis of RNA-IP data 332
Raw data were obtained from the independent datasets. Adapter trimming and quality filtering were 333
performed using Cutadapt (v3.7), where low -quality bases (Phred score <20) and Illumina adapter 334
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
sequences were removed. The resulting high -quality reads were aligned to the mouse reference 335
genome (mm10) using HISAT2 (v2.2.1), and alignment statistics were compiled. Peaks of enriched 336
methylation were identified using exomePeak (v2.16.0), which also detected differential methylation 337
between experimental conditions. Statistically significant and replicate -consistent peaks were 338
classified as hypermethylated (log2FC > 0) or hypomethylated (log2FC < 0), with further filtering 339
based on a ≥2-fold change. Peaks were annotated as coding or noncoding based on genomic context. 340
Volcano plots were generated to visualise p-values and fold changes, highlighting robust differentially 341
methylated sites across conditions. Violin plots were generated to visualise the global shift of m6A 342
deposition along the transcripts. 343
Primary neuronal culture recordings 344
Primary hippocampal neurons were prepared and maintained under standard conditions. Neurons 345
were transfected at DIV7 with 2 µg of FTO -targeting shRNA constructs (shRNA1) or control RNAi 346
using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Recordings were performed at DIV18–DIV25. 347
Whole-cell patch -clamp recordings were performed using borosilicate glass electrodes (3 –8 M Ω). 348
Neurons were voltage-clamped at −70 mV . mEPSCs were recorded for 300 s per cell in extracellular 349
solution consisting of (in mM: NaCl 119, KCl 5, CaCl₂ 2, MgCl₂ 2, glucose 30, HEPES 10), with pH 350
adjusted to 7.4 and osmolarity of 310 –320 mOsm, supplemented with tetrodotoxin (1 µM) and 351
bicuculline (10 µM). The internal solution consisted of (in mM: cesium gluconate 100, EGTA 0.2, MgCl₂ 352
5, ATP 2, GTP 0.3, HEPES 40), with pH adjusted to 7.2 and osmolarity of 285 –290 mOsm. 353
Cells with series resistance ≤30 MΩ and stable recordings were analysed. Cells with holding currents 354
< −100 pA or unstable recordings were excluded. 355
Statistical analysis 356
Statistical analyses were performed for all experiments, with data presented as mean ± SEM. The 357
designation 'N' refers to the number of pregnant dams or litters used, while 'n' indicates the total 358
number of pups obtained from these dams. For qRT-PCR data, immunoblots on m6A regulators, and 359
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
puromycin incorporation assay, we employed unpaired Student’s t-tests with Welch’s correction for 360
unequal variance. Paired Student’s t -tests were used for analysing FTO overexpression and 361
knockdown efficiency data in HEK293t cells. Two -way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test and no 362
correction was applied for analysing light/dark and SOR data. Data for litter effect was assessed using 363
2-way ANOVA and corrected with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Post -hoc power analysis 364
was conducted using GPower 3.1 for all experiments. Outliers were identified using the ROUT method 365
(0.1% aggressive). Immunoblot band intensity analysis and image stitching were performed using 366
ImageJ software. The volcano plot was obtained with FDR > 0.05 Gene Ontology plots were generated 367
using RStudio and SRplot (Tang et al. 2023). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. 368
369
Results
370
Maternal separation induces deposition of m6A mark in hippocampal transcriptome during 371
early development. 372
Previous studies established the role of m 6A in developing neural cells and also identified its 373
dysregulation as an emerging hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders, e.g. Huntington's Disease (Du 374
et al., 2019; Pupak et al., 2022). To understand the effect of ELS on global m 6A modification, we 375
performed a bulk RNA -seq from m 6A-modified precipitated hippocampal RNAs (Fig. 1A -B). This 376
approach revealed 291 significantly hypermethylated transcripts among 853 hypermethylated 377
candidates (both mRNAs and lncRNAs) and one significantly hypomethylated transcript out of 71 378
hypomethylated candidates (Fig. 1C). Moreover , analysis of the distribution of methylation peaks 379
indicated a broader shift in m 6A deposition along lncRNA transcripts and within the 3’ -UTR and 5’ -380
UTR of mRNAs, suggesting a mechanism by which early-life stress may reprogram hippocampal gene 381
expression through RNA methylation (Fig. 1D-E). In addition, we examined the m6A peak enrichment 382
around canonical DRACH motifs within transcripts encoding key RNA -binding proteins (RBPs) 383
relevant to neuronal function. Among the candidates analysed exhibited reduced enrichment at the 384
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
adenosine of the DRACH motif, where the m 6A peak is typically localised (Fig. 1H). A comparable 385
pattern of altered distribution was observed for Pum1 and, to a lesser extent, G3bp2 (Fig 1M, 1I). In 386
contrast, Srsf2, Srsf9 and Fxr1 did not display detectable changes in peak profiles (Fig. 1L, 1K, 1J). 387
Whereas Srsf1 and Pum2 showed a shift in the m6A peak (Fig. 1F , 1G), thereby suggesting the 388
existence of distinct modes of stress-induced remodelling of the RBP-associated methylation sites. 389
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
390
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
Figure 1. Maternal Separation enhances m6A modifications of hippocampal transcripts . (A) 391
Experimental workflow, N = 3. (B) Representative dot blot showing m6A immunoprecipitation (IP) 392
efficiency, N = 3. (C) Volcano plot for RNA expression of home -caged (HC) versus maternally 393
separated (MS) P21 pups. Red dots = significantly upregulated RNAs; blue dots = significantly 394
downregulated RNAs in maternally separated pups, total variables = 23,211, N = 3, FDR > 0.05. (D) 395
Density plot for distribution of m6A peaks along different regions of mRNA transcripts (5' UTR, coding 396
sequence (CDS), and 3' UTR), between HC and MS groups, N=3. (E) Density plot for distribution of 397
m6A peaks along lncRNAs in HC vs MS groups, N=3. (F-M) The relative change position of the binding 398
site of different RBPs: (F) SRSF1, (G) PUM2, (H) MBNL1, (I) G3BP2, (J) FRX1, (K) SRSF9, (L) SRSF2, 399
and (M) PUM1 in relation to the m6A (DRACH) motif; the “ A” position is considered as 0. 400
Also see Supplementary Figure 1. 401
—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 402
403
Maternal separation selectively downregulates FTO expression in a sex-specific manner 404
Given the dynamic regulation of m 6A by readers, writers and erasers, we examined their expression 405
at the transcript as well as protein level, to identify the factors underlying the altered methylation 406
landscape induced by maternal separation. 407
We assessed the expression of core m6A regulatory components in hippocampal tissue from P21 male 408
mice using quantitative real -time PCR. No significant alterations were detected in the methylases 409
METTL3 (52.93±41.65, p=0.24) and METTL14 (65.63±51.07, p=0.24) (Fig. 2A -B), the demethylase 410
Alkb5 (29.07±18.19, p=0.15) (Fig. 2D), or the readers YTHDF2 (14.91 ± 19.46, p=0.46) and YTHDF3 411
(17.57± 14.15, p=0.24) (Fig. 2F -G). In contrast, maternal separation significantly reduced the 412
expression of the demethylase FTO (38.58 ± 14.64, p=0.02) (Fig. 2C) and the reader YTHDF1(36.15 ± 413
14.35, p=0.03) (Fig. 2E), suggesting that early -life stress selectively targets components of the m 6A 414
machinery. 415
To observe the expression at the protein level, we performed immunoblotting for METTL3 and FTO 416
in hippocampus lysates. In P21 male mice, METTL3 protein abundance was not significantly altered 417
(0.6140 ± 0.4141, p=0.15) (Fig. 2J), whereas FTO expression was significantly reduced following MS 418
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
(0.4549 ± 0.1757, p=0.02) (Fig. 2I). To determine whether this effect persisted into young adulthood, 419
we re-examined the expression profile of METTL3 and FTO at P28. We found a similar pattern where 420
FTO was significantly downregulated (0.6170±0.2238, p=0.023) and there was no effect on METTL3 421
protein expression (0.2554±0.2805, p=0.37) (Fig 2L, M). 422
To understand the sexual dimorphism in this regulation, we also examined the levels of FTO and 423
METTL3 in the hippocampus of maternally separated female mice at P21 and P28. At P21, expression 424
of FTO as well as METTL3 in female hippocampus were similar to that of P21 males; with a 425
significantly downregulated FTO (0.6842±0.178, p=0.004) and insignificant change in METTL3 426
expression (0.098±0.188, p=0.612) (Fig. S1A -C). But at P28, there was no significant difference in 427
expression of FTO (0.049±0.316, p=0.87) or METTL3 (0.0005±0.33, p=0.99) between the MS and the 428
control mice (Fig. S1D-F). The sustained reduction of FTO, observed in males, appears to be transient 429
in females. This highlights a sexually dimorphic regulation in epigenetic response to ELS. 430
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
431
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
Figure 2. Regulation of readers, writers and erasers upon maternal separation. Differential 432
expression of methylases (A) METTL3 and (B) METTL14, demethylases (C) FTO and (D) Alkb5 and 433
reader proteins (E) YTHDF1, (F) YTHDF2 and (G) YTHDF3 transcripts as obtained by qPCR. *p < 0.05, 434
**p < 0.01, ns = not significant. N=7, Data shown as Mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t -test with 435
Welch's correction. Immunoblot showing expression of FTO and METTL3 in males (H) at P21, and 436
(K) at P28. Quantification of FTO expression in (I) P21; N=3-4, n=7-11 and in (L) P28; N=3-4, n=8, 437
males. Quantification of METTL3 expression in (J) P21 and in (M) P28 males. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns 438
= not significant. Mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t-test with Welch's correction. 439
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 440
441
FTO overexpression does not rescue MS-induced anxiety-like behaviour 442
MS markedly increased anxiety in P45 C57BL/6 male mice, as shown by reduced distanced traveled 443
in the light compartment (5.908±2.796, p=0.04) and fewer transitions made between the two 444
compartments (13.86±3.683, p=0.0009) as compared to the HC (homecaged) animals (Fig. 3A -3D). 445
The change in time spent in the light compartment showed no significant difference (19±72.26, 446
p=0.79) between the MS and the HC cohort. This was probably because, due to heightened anxiety, 447
the MS animals froze upon entering the light box (Fig. 3E). 448
FTO overexpression in the hippocampus did not alleviate anxiety -like behaviour in the MS group. 449
FTO-OE (FTO overexpression) MS mice exhibited comparable anxiety levels to EGFP MS controls, 450
with no significant differences in time spent in the light box (54.47±66.62, p=0.42), distance travelled 451
(4.107±2.578, p=0.12), or transitions made (6.686±3.395, p=0.059). FTO overexpression alone did 452
not affect baseline anxiety, as no differences were observed between FTO -OE HC and EGFP HC mice 453
across time (46.57±75.21, p=0.54), distance (3.796±2.91, p=0.2) or transitions (3.643±3.833, 454
p=0.35) (Fig. 3C-E). FTO-OE MS mice displayed elevated anxiety relative to FTO-OE HC controls (time: 455
11.1±69.81, p=0.87; distance: 13.81±2.701, p< 0.0001; transitions: 16.9±3.558, p< 0.0001), which 456
again mirrored the behavioural pattern of EGFP MS mice (time: 11.1±69.81, p=0.87; distance: 457
13.81±2.701, p< 0.0001; transitions: 10.21±3.833, p=0.01) (Fig. 3C-E). To rule out litter-specific bias, 458
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
we analysed behavioural variations within litters under the same conditions and detected no 459
significant differences (Fig. S5). Collectively, FTO overexpression in the hippocampus did not rescue 460
the anxiety phenotype induced by MS. 461
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
462
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
Figure 3. FTO overexpression does not reverse elevated anxiety following maternal 463
separation. (A) Paradigm depicting light/dark box assay. (B) Representative trace in the bright -lit 464
arena in the light/dark box. HC = Homecaged, MS = Maternally Separated, EGFP = Empty plasmid with 465
GFP fluorescence, FTO -OE= Plasmid with FTO overexpression and GFP fluorescence. (C) Distance 466
covered in the light box (in meters). (D) Total number of transitions made between light and dark 467
box. (E) Time spent in the light box (in seconds). Data shown as mean±SEM, N=3, n=7 -10, *p<0.05 468
**p< 0.01, ***p<0.005, ****p<0.0001, ns not significant. Two-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test. 469
Also see supplementary figure S5 470
—---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 471
472
FTO overexpression rescues spatial memory deficits of young adult mice caused by maternal 473
separation. 474
FTO regulates memory consolidation via an m 6A-dependent BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway 475
(Chang et al., 2023; Song et al., 2024). Previous studies have demonstrated that de novo 476
protein translation is differentially engaged across early (1–3 hrs) and late (24 hrs) phases 477
following neuronal activity, corresponding to short-term and long-term memory formation 478
(Santini et al., 2014, Schafe et al., 2000). We therefore investigated the role of FTO in 479
rescuing spatial memory deficits induced by ELS by testing spatial memory at two time 480
points post-training: 3 hours and 24 hours. 481
Test at 3 hours post-training: The SOR assay measures preference for a displaced object over a non -482
displaced object. But at 3 hours post-training, the percentage time spent with displaced object in test 483
session of EGFP-MS animals was comparable to that of the EGFP -HC group (3.739±6.03, p>0.0009). 484
Additionally, MS mice receiving the FTO-OE (FTO-OE MS) construct also did not display a significant 485
difference in percentage time spent with displaced object in test session compared to their EGFP-MS 486
counterparts (5.028±6.03, p>0.0009) (Fig. 4C). Briefly, no significant change in spatial memory was 487
observed in MS animals upon FTO overexpression at the hippocampus 3 hours post training. 488
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
26
Test at 24 hours post -training: The test sessions conducted 24 hours post -training showed 489
significantly low exploration of the displaced object in EGFP -MS animals as compared to the EGFP -490
HC animals (14.67±4.508, p=0.051). When FTO was overexpressed in the hippocampus of MS animals 491
(FTO-OE MS), this loss of spatial memory was rescued, as shown by a higher percentage of time spent 492
with the displaced object in the test session as compared to EGFP -MS group (12.64±4.41, p=0.04). 493
The exploration of FTO -OE MS animals was comparable to FTO -OE HC animals (4.692±4.41, 494
p>0.0009) and to EGFP -HC animals (2.03±4.287, p>0.0009). Thus, FTO overexpression conferred a 495
measurable improvement in spatial memory under ELS. Importantly, FTO-OE HC group did not alter 496
baseline exploration with percentage time spent with displaced object in test session values similar 497
to EGFP-HC mice (2.662±4.508, p>0.0009) (Fig. 4E). 498
The behavioural variation within litter was ruled out by studying the litter effect within the same 499
experimental condition (Fig. S4). Further , no object preference was seen in any experimental group, 500
ruling out any object bias (Fig. S3). Therefore, we observed that FTO overexpression in the 501
hippocampus of MS-induced animals was sufficient to rescue spatial memory deficits 24 hours post-502
training. 503
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
27
504
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
28
Figure 4. FTO overexpression reverses the effect of MS -induced deficits in memory . (A) 505
Paradigm for SOR. (B, D) Representative heat maps in the arena with the displaced object during the 506
test session, white ‘D’= object displaced; (B) 3 hours and (D) 24 hours post -training. HC = 507
Homecaged, MS = Maternally Separated, EGFP = Empty plasmid with GFP fluorescence, FTO -OE = 508
Plasmid with FTO overexpression and GFP fluorescence. (C, E) Percentage time spent with displaced 509
object during the test session, (C) 3 hours, N=3, n=7-9, and (E) 24 hours, N=3, n=9-11, post-training. 510
Data shows Mean ± SEM., *p< 0.05, ns = not significant. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction. 511
Also see supplementary figures S3 and S4. 512
—---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513
FTO downregulation reduces protein synthesis in primary hippocampal neurons 514
FTO knockdown was used to mimic the stress-induced reduction observed in vivo. This resulted in a 515
significant decrease in puromycin -labelled nascent proteins, reflecting diminished translation 516
activity in the absence of FTO (Fig. 5A). To minimise off -target effects, two shRNA constructs were 517
used: FTO-RNAi_1 and FTO_RNAi_2. The knockdown efficiency of these constructs was verified by 518
transfecting each construct and a control RNAi in HEK293T cells, followed by an immunoblot (FTO -519
RNAi_1: 55.12±20.87, p=0.02; FTO-RNAi_2: 64.84±22.78, p=0.15) (Fig. S6). FTO knockdown resulted 520
in lower protein synthesis both in soma (FTO -RNAi_1: 54.89 ± 12.50, p<0.0001; FTO -RNAi_2: 50.17 521
± 13.08, p=0.0003) and the dendrites (FTO -RNAi_1: 38.65 ± 7.579, p<0.0001; FTO -RNAi_2: 42.77 ± 522
7.259, p<0.0001) (Fig. 5B, C). Together , these data indicate that FTO is required to maintain basal 523
protein synthesis in hippocampal neurons, and its loss disrupts translation in both somatic and 524
dendritic domains of mature neurons. 525
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
29
526
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
30
Figure 5. FTO RNAi reduces translation in primary hippocampal neurons. (A) Representative 527
images of cultured primary hippocampal neurons transduced with control or FTO -targeting shRNA 528
constructs (FTO_RNAi_1 and FTO_RNAi_2), co -expressing mCherry (shRNA marker , red), O -529
propargyl-puromycin (OPP) (GFP channel, green), and MAP2 (fRed, magenta). Scale bars: 50 μ. (B–530
C) Quantification of puromycin incorporation as % fold change in signal intensity in (B) dendrites 531
and (C) soma. Data are shown as Mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Unpaired t-532
test with Welch’s correction, N = 24-36, n = 94-172, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. 533
—---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 534
m6A-modified RNA -interacting RBPs regulate RNA metabolism including protein synthesis 535
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment of the hypermethylated transcripts revealed broad associations with 536
RNA metabolic processes, including RNA 5’ -end processing, ribosome biogenesis, translation and 537
ribonucleoprotein complex assembly (Fig. 6). To gain deeper insights into the functional pathways 538
potentially regulated by these transcripts, we performed GO analysis on their interacting RBPs. The 539
biological process showed a significant regulation for pathways including mRNA metabolic processes, 540
RNA localisation, cytoplasmic translation and post -transcriptional regulation of gene expression. 541
Other terms, like dendritic transport of ribonucleoprotein, highlighted the potential regulation of 542
translation in neuronal processes. Additionally, enrichment of terms like stress granule assembly and 543
3’UTR-mediated RNA stabilisation and destabilisation suggest a possible MS -induced translational 544
control of these RBPs (Fig. S7A). 545
Further , cellular component analysis was enriched with terms including dendritic spines, distal 546
axons, synapses, polysomes and cytoplasmic stress granules. These terms are associated with the 547
localisation of these RBPs to neuronal compartments specialised for RNA storage and translation (Fig. 548
S7B). Molecular function enrichment revealed a predominance of RNA -binding activities, including 549
mRNA 3’UTR binding, translation initiation factor binding and N6 -methyldenosine (m6A)-modified 550
RNA binding, as well as interactions with regulatory RNA elements such as G -quadruplexes and 551
miRNAs (Fig S7C). Together , these findings suggest that the m6A-modified RNA-interacting RBPs are 552
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
31
well positioned to orchestrate spatial events at the synapse, potentially contributing to experience -553
dependent synaptic plasticity. 554
555
556
Figure 6. Gene Ontology enrichment of m⁶A -modified transcripts upon maternal separation. 557
(A) Biological process, (B) Cellular components, FDR>0.05. 558
Also see supplementary figure S7. 559
560
References
640
1. Akhtar , J., Lugoboni, M., & Junion , G. (2021). m6A RNA modification in transcription 641
regulation. Transcription, 12(5), 266–276. 642
https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2022.2057177 643
2. Alves, J., de Sa Couto-Pereira, N., de Lima, R. M. S., Quillfeldt, J. A., & Dalmaz, C. (2022). Effects 644
of Early Life Adversities upon Memory Processes and Cognition in Rodent Models. 645
Neuroscience, 497, 282–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.04.023 646
3. Anders, M., Chelysheva, I., Goebel, I., Trenkner , T ., Zhou, J., Mao, Y ., Verzini, S., Qian, S. B., & 647
Ignatova, Z. (2018). Dynamic m6a methylation facilitates mRNA triaging to stress granules. 648
Life Science Alliance, 1(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800113 649
4. Banerjee, D., Sultana, S., & Banerjee, S. (2024). Gas5 regulates early-life stress-induced anxiety 650
and spatial memory. Journal of Neurochemistry , 168(9), 2999 –3018. 651
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16167 652
5. Bayoumi, M., & Munir , M. (2021). Evolutionary conservation of the DRACH signatures of 653
potential N6 -methyladenosine (m6A) sites among influenza A viruses. Scientific Reports , 654
11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84007-0 655
6. Bertagna, N. B., dos Santos, P . G. C., Queiroz, R. M., Fernandes, G. J. D., Cruz, F . C., & Miguel, T . T . 656
(2021). Involvement of the ventral, but not dorsal, hippocampus in anxiety -like behaviors in 657
mice exposed to the elevated plus maze: participation of CRF1 receptor and PKA pathway. 658
Pharmacological Reports, 73(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00182-3 659
7. Bourin, M., & Hascoe t, M. (2003). The mouse light/dark box test. European Journal of 660
Pharmacology, 463(1–3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01274-3 661
8. Briggs, J. A., Wolvetang, E. J., Mattick, J. S., Rinn, J. L., & Barry, G. (2015). Mechanisms of Long 662
Non-coding RNAs in Mammalian Nervous System Development, Plasticity, Disease, and 663
Evolution. Neuron, 88(5), 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.045 664
9. Brosens, N., Simon, C., Kessels, H. W ., Lucassen, P . J., & Krugers , H. J. (2023). Early life stress 665
lastingly alters the function and AMPA-receptor composition of glutamatergic synapses in the 666
hippocampus of male mice. Journal of Neuroendocrinology , 35(12). 667
https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13346 668
10. Chang, R., Zhu, S., Peng, J., Lang, Z., Zhou, X., Liao, H., Zou, J., Zeng, P ., & Tan, S. (2023). The 669
hippocampal FTO -BDNF-TrkB pathway is required for novel object recognition memory 670
reconsolidation in mice. Translational Psychiatry, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398 -671
023-02647-4 672
11. Du, K., Zhang, L., Lee, T ., & Sun, T . (2019). m 6 A RNA Methylation Controls Neural Development 673
and Is Involved in Human Diseases. In Molecular Neurobiology (Vol. 56, Number 3, pp. 1596–674
1606). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1138-1 675
12. Ernst, C., & Morton, C. C. (2013). Identification and function of long non-coding RNA. Frontiers 676
in Cellular Neuroscience, 7(OCT), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00168 677
13. Fatica, A., & Bozzoni, I. (2014). Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and 678
development. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3606 679
14. Hanson, J. L., Nacewicz, B. M., Sutterer , M. J., Cayo, A. A., Schaefer , S. M., Rudolph, K. D., Shirtcliff, 680
E. A., Pollak, S. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Behavioral problems after early life stress: 681
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
36
Contributions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Biological Psychiatry , 77(4), 314 –323. 682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.020 683
15. Ji, J., Mu, X., Xu, S., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Yao, L., Xie, Q., & Bi, Y . (2024). Conservation and distribution 684
of the DRACH motif for potential m6A sites in avian leukosis virus subgroup J. Frontiers in 685
Veterinary Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1374430 686
16. Jia, G., Fu, Y ., Zhao, X., Dai, Q., Zheng, G., Yang, Y ., Yi, C., Lindahl, T ., Pan, T ., Yang, Y . G., & He, C. 687
(2011). N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity -associated 688
FTO. Nature Chemical Biology, 7(12), 885–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.687 689
17. Jiang, Y ., Zhang, T ., Yang, L., Du, Z., Wang, Q., Hou, J., Liu, Y ., Song, Q., Zhao, J., & Wu, Y . (2023). 690
Downregulation of FTO in the hippocampus is associated with mental disorders induced by 691
fear stress during pregnancy. Behavioural Brain Research , 453(July), 114598. 692
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr .2023.114598 693
18. Kaech, S., & Banker , G. (2006). Culturing hippocampal neurons. Nature Protocols, 1(5), 2406–694
2415. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.356 695
19. Kisliouk, T ., Rosenberg, T ., Ben-Nun, O., Ruzal, M., & Meiri, N. (2020). Early -life m6A RNA 696
demethylation by fat mass and obesity -associated protein (Fto) influences resilience or 697
vulnerability to heat stress later in life. ENeuro, 7(3), 1 –14. 698
https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0549-19.2020 699
20. Lee, S. L., Lew, D., Wickenheisser , V ., & Markus, E. J. (2019). Interdependence between dorsal 700
and ventral hippocampus during spatial navigation. Brain and Behavior , 9(10), 1 –14. 701
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1410 702
21. Leger , M., Quiedeville, A., Bouet, V ., Haelewyn, B., Boulouard, M., Schumann-Bard, P ., & Freret, 703
T . (2013). Object recognition test in mice. Nature Protocols , 8(12), 2531 –2537. 704
https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.155 705
22. Levin, R. Y ., & Liu, R. T . (2021). Life stress, early maltreatment, and prospective associations 706
with depression and anxiety in preadolescent children: A six -year , multi-wave study. Journal 707
of Affective Disorders , 278(September 2020), 276 –279. 708
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.072 709
23. Liau, W . S., Zhao, Q., Bademosi, A., Gormal, R. S., Gong, H., Marshall, P . R., Periyakaruppiah, A., 710
Madugalle, S. U., Zajaczkowski, E. L., Leighton, L. J., Ren, H., Musgrove, M., Davies, J., Rauch, S., 711
He, C., Dickinson, B. C., Li, X., Wei, W ., Meunier , F . A., … Bredy, T . W . (2023). Fear extinction is 712
regulated by the activity of long noncoding RNAs at the synapse. Nature Communications, 713
14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43535-1 714
24. Lin, L. Y ., Zhang, J., Dai, X. M., Xiao, N. A., Wu, X. L., Wei, Z., Fang, W . T ., Zhu, Y . G., & Chen, X. C. 715
(2016). Early -life stress leads to impaired spatial learning and memory in middle -aged 716
ApoE4-TR mice. Molecular Neurodegeneration , 11(1), 1 –16. 717
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-016-0107-2 718
25. Livneh, I., Moshitch -Moshkovitz, S., Amariglio, N., Rechavi, G., & Dominissini, D. (2020). The 719
m6A epitranscriptome: transcriptome plasticity in brain development and function. Nature 720
Reviews Neuroscience, 21(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0244-z 721
26. Loedige, I., Baranovskii, A., Mendonsa, S., Dantsuji, S., Popitsch, N., Breimann , L., Zerna, N., 722
Cherepanov, V ., Milek, M., Ameres, S., & Chekulaeva, M. (2023). mRNA stability and m6A are 723
major determinants of subcellular mRNA localization in neurons. Molecular Cell , 83(15), 724
2709-2725.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.021 725
27. Ma, L., Bajic, V . B., & Zhang, Z. (2013). On the classification of long non -coding RNAs. RNA 726
Biology, 10(6), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.24604 727
28. Malovic, E., & Pandey, S. C. (2023). N 6-methyladenosine (m6A) epitranscriptomics in synaptic 728
plasticity and behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology, 48(1), 221 –222. 729
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01414-1 730
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
37
29. Mattick, J. S., Amaral, P . P ., Carninci, P ., Carpenter , S., Chang, H. Y ., Chen, L. L., Chen, R., Dean, C., 731
Dinger , M. E., Fitzgerald, K. A., Gingeras, T . R., Guttman, M., Hirose, T ., Huarte, M., Johnson, R., 732
Kanduri, C., Kapranov, P ., Lawrence, J. B., Lee, J. T ., … Wu, M. (2023). Long non -coding RNAs: 733
definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell 734
Biology, 24(June), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00566-8 735
30. Mercer , T . R., Dinger , M. E., & Mattick, J. S. (2009). Long non -coding RNAs: Insights into 736
functions. In Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2521 737
31. Mercer , T . R., Dinger , M. E., Sunkin, S. M., Mehler , M. F ., & Mattick, J. S. (2008). Specific 738
expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain. Proceedings of the National Academy 739
of Sciences of the United States of America , 105(2), 716 –721. 740
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706729105 741
32. Mitsuhashi, H., & Nagy, C. (2023). Potential Roles of m6A and FTO in Synaptic Connectivity 742
and Major Depressive Disorder . International Journal of Molecular Sciences , 24(7). 743
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076220 744
33. Pan, G., Chen, Z., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y ., Xu, H., Bu, G., Zheng, H., & Li, Y . (2018). Compensatory 745
Mechanisms Modulate the Neuronal Excitability in a Kainic Acid -Induced Epilepsy Mouse 746
Model. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir .2018.00048 747
34. Papatheodoropoulos, C. (2025). Compensatory Regulation of Excitation/Inhibition Balance in 748
the Ventral Hippocampus: Insights from Fragile X Syndrome. In Biology (Vol. 14, Number 4). 749
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). 750
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14040363 751
35. Pattwell, S. S., & Bath, K. G. (2017). Emotional learning, stress, and development: An ever -752
changing landscape shaped by early -life experience. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory , 753
143, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.04.014 754
36. Ping, X. L., Sun, B. F ., Wang, L., Xiao, W ., Yang, X., Wang, W . J., Adhikari, S., Shi, Y ., Lv, Y ., Chen, Y . 755
S., Zhao, X., Li, A., Yang, Y ., Dahal, U., Lou, X. M., Liu, X., Huang, J., Yuan, W . P ., Zhu, X. F ., … Yang, 756
Y . G. (2014). Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6 -methyladenosine 757
methyltransferase. Cell Research, 24(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr .2014.3 758
37. Pupak, A., Singh, A., Sancho -Balsells, A., Alcala -Vida, R., Espina, M., Giralt, A., Martí , E., Ørom, 759
U. A. V ., Gine s, S., & Brito, V . (2022). Altered m6A RNA methylation contributes to hippocampal 760
memory deficits in Huntington’s disease mice. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 79(8), 1–761
21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04444-6 762
38. Rodriguez A, Zhang H, Klaminder J, Brodin T , Andersson PL, Andersson M (2018) ToxTrac: A 763
fast and robust software for tracking organisms. Methods Ecol Evol 9:460–464. 764
39. Samaddar Sarbani. (2023). Transcriptomic analysis identifies synapse -enriched lncRNAs 765
required for excitatory synapse development and fear memory. BioRxiv, 1 –50. 766
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.14.549055 767
40. Santini, E., Huynh, T . N., & Klann, E. (2014). Mechanisms of translation control underlying 768
long-lasting synaptic plasticity and the consolidation of long -term memory. In Progress in 769
Molecular Biology and Translational Science (Vol. 122, pp. 131 –167). Elsevier B.V . 770
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420170-5.00005-2 771
41. Santos-Rodriguez, G., Srivastava, A., Ravindran, A., Oyelami, F ., Ip, K., Gupta, P ., Villanueva, J., 772
King, H., Grootveld, A., Blackburn, J., Gupta, I., Vieira, H., Shirokikh, N., Eyras, E., & Weatheritt, 773
R. (2024). The conserved landscape of RNA modifications and transcript diversity across 774
mammalian evolution. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.24.624934 775
42. Sendinc, E., & Shi, Y . (2023). RNA m6A methylation across the transcriptome. Molecular Cell, 776
83(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.01.006 777
43. Schafe, G. E., Ledoux, J. E., & Keck, W . M. (2000). Memory Consolidation of Auditory Pavlovian 778
Fear Conditioning Requires Protein Synthesis and Protein Kinase A in the Amygdala. 779
http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/4501 780
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
38
44. Shi, C., Zhang, L., & Qin, C. (2017). Long non -coding RNAs in brain development, synaptic 781
biology, and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Research Bulletin , 132(5), 160 –169. 782
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.03.010 783
45. Shi, H., Zhang, X., Weng, Y . L., Lu, Z., Liu, Y ., Lu, Z., Li, J., Hao, P ., Zhang, Y ., Zhang, F ., Wu, Y ., 784
Delgado, J. Y ., Su, Y ., Patel, M. J., Cao, X., Shen, B., Huang, X., Ming, G. li, Zhuang, X., … Zhou, T . 785
(2018). m6A facilitates hippocampus -dependent learning and memory through YTHDF1. 786
Nature, 563(7730), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0666-1 787
46. Simon, P ., Dupuis, R., & Costentin , J. (1994). Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. 788
Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behavioural Brain Research , 61(1), 59 –64. 789
https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)90008-6 790
47. Song, J., Hao, J., Lu, Y ., Ding, X., Li, M., & Xin, Y . (2024). Increased m6A modification of BDNF 791
mRNA via FTO promotes neuronal apoptosis following aluminum -induced oxidative stress. 792
Environmental Pollution, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123848 793
48. Sood, A., Pati, S., Bhattacharya, A., Chaudhari, K., & Vaidya, V . A. (2018). Early emergence of 794
altered 5-HT2A receptor-evoked behavior , neural activation and gene expression following 795
maternal separation. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience , 65(September 796
2017), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.10.005 797
49. Spratt, P . W . E., Alexander , R. P . D., Ben-Shalom, R., Sahagun, A., Kyoung, H., Keeshen, C. M., 798
Sanders, S. J., & Bender , K. J. (2021). Paradoxical hyperexcitability from NaV1.2 sodium 799
channel loss in neocortical pyramidal cells. Cell Reports , 36(5). 800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109483 801
50. Spychala, A., & Ru ther , U. (2019). FTO affects hippocampal function by regulation of BDNF 802
processing. PLoS ONE, 14(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211937 803
51. Takao, K., & Miyakawa, T . (2006). Light/dark transition test for mice. Journal of Visualized 804
Experiments, 1, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3791/104 805
52. Walters, B. J., Mercaldo, V ., Gillon, C. J., Yip, M., Neve, R. L., Boyce, F . M., Frankland, P . W ., & 806
Josselyn, S. A. (2017). The Role of The RNA Demethylase FTO (Fat Mass and Obesity -807
Associated) and mRNA Methylation in Hippocampal Memory Formation. 808
Neuropsychopharmacology, 42(7), 1502–1510. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.31 809
53. Wang, A., Wang, J., Liu, Y ., & Zhou, Y . (2017). Mechanisms of long non -coding RNAs in the 810
assembly and plasticity of neural circuitry. Frontiers in Neural Circuits , 11(October). 811
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir .2017.00076 812
54. Wang, A., Zou, X., Wu, J., Ma, Q., Yuan, N., Ding, F ., Li, X., & Chen, J. (2020). Early -Life Stress 813
Alters Synaptic Plasticity and mTOR Signaling: Correlation With Anxiety-Like and Cognition-814
Related Behavior . Frontiers in Genetics , 11(December), 1 –11. 815
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.590068 816
55. Wang, P ., Doxtader , K. A., & Nam, Y . (2016). Structural Basis for Cooperative Function of Mettl3 817
and Mettl14 Methyltransferases. Molecular Cell , 63(2), 306 –317. 818
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.041 819
56. Widagdo, J. (n.d.). Journal of Neurochemistry - 2018 - Widagdo - The m6A-epitranscriptomic 820
signature in neurobiology from neurodevelopment to.pdf. 821
57. Wimmer , M. E., Hernandez, P . J., Blackwell, J., & Abel, T . (2012). Aging impairs hippocampus-822
dependent long-term memory for object location in mice. Neurobiology of Aging, 33(9), 2220–823
2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.07.007 824
58. Xie, M., Pallegar , P . N., Parusel, S., Nguyen, A. T ., & Wu, L. J. (2023). Regulation of cortical 825
hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: focusing on glial mechanisms. In Molecular 826
Neurodegeneration (Vol. 18, Number 1). BioMed Central Ltd. 827
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-023-00665-w 828
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint
39
59. Zaccara, S., & Jaffrey, S. R. (2020). A Unified Model for the Function of YTHDF Proteins in 829
Regulating m6A -Modified mRNA. Cell, 181(7), 1582 -1595.e18. 830
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.012 831
60. Zheng, G., Dahl, J. A., Niu, Y ., Fedorcsak, P ., Huang, C. M., Li, C. J., Va ̊ gbø, C. B., Shi, Y ., Wang, W . L., 832
Song, S. H., Lu, Z., Bosmans, R. P . G., Dai, Q., Hao, Y . J., Yang, X., Zhao, W . M., Tong, W . M., Wang, 833
X. J., Bogdan, F ., … He, C. (2013). ALKBH5 Is a Mammalian RNA Demethylase that Impacts RNA 834
Metabolism and Mouse Fertility. Molecular Cell , 49(1), 18 –29. 835
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015 836
837
838
839
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 30, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.30.715262doi: bioRxiv preprint