Developmental density shapes adult mate guarding strategies in an invertebrate

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Post-copulatory mate guarding is a widespread reproductive strategy that reduces sperm competition but can generate sexual conflict when male and female optima diverge. While mate guarding is known to respond plastically to immediate social conditions, the extent to which early-life social environments of both sexes shape adult guarding behaviour remains poorly understood. We experimentally tested how developmental density of males and females influences post-copulatory mate guarding and associated behaviours in the nuptial gift–giving cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Using a full factorial design, we reared males and females under high or low same-sex densities and crossed them in standardized no-choice mating trials. We quantified mate-guarding duration, the intensity of guarding, female feeding time on the nuptial gift and ampulla retention time. Contrary to our prediction, males reared at low density guarded females for significantly longer than males from high density. Females reared at low density were also guarded for longer, with largely additive effects of the two treatments. Further analyses revealed that longer mate guarding prolonged female feeding and ampulla retention. These results demonstrate that developmental social environment can have lasting, sex-specific effects on post-copulatory behaviour and that mate guarding is functionally linked to mechanisms that ensure sperm transfer. Our findings highlight how early social cues can bias adult reproductive tactics and, consequently, the outcomes of sexual selection in polygamous mating systems.
Full text 2,546 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Post-copulatory mate guarding is a widespread reproductive strategy that reduces sperm competition but can generate sexual conflict when male and female optima diverge. While mate guarding is known to respond plastically to immediate social conditions, the extent to which early-life social environments of both sexes shape adult guarding behaviour remains poorly understood. We experimentally tested how developmental density of males and females influences post-copulatory mate guarding and associated behaviours in the nuptial gift–giving cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Using a full factorial design, we reared males and females under high or low same-sex densities and crossed them in standardized no-choice mating trials. We quantified mate-guarding duration, the intensity of guarding, female feeding time on the nuptial gift and ampulla retention time. Contrary to our prediction, males reared at low density guarded females for significantly longer than males from high density. Females reared at low density were also guarded for longer, with largely additive effects of the two treatments. Further analyses revealed that longer mate guarding prolonged female feeding and ampulla retention. These results demonstrate that developmental social environment can have lasting, sex-specific effects on post-copulatory behaviour and that mate guarding is functionally linked to mechanisms that ensure sperm transfer. Our findings highlight how early social cues can bias adult reproductive tactics and, consequently, the outcomes of sexual selection in polygamous mating systems. https://doi.org/10.32942/X26M12 Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology, Evolution, Life Sciences sexual conflict, shared mating trait, post copulatory behaviour, Mate guarding, variance partitioning Published: 2026-01-19 20:10 Last Updated: 2026-01-19 20:10 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and code are publicly available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18301357 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00