A Divergence-Calibrated Framework for Robust Cross-Species Comparison of Effective Population Size Ratios

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

1. Comparing effective population size (Nₑ) ratios among autosomes, the X, Y, and mitochondrial genomes is a powerful approach for inferring sex-specific demography and selection; however, chromosome- and lineage-specific mutation-rate differences have prevented reliable cross-species comparisons. 2. We introduce a phylogenetically informed framework that uses interspecific divergence to calibrate chromosome-specific mutation rates, yielding unbiased Nₑ ratios that are free of external priors and directly comparable across diverse taxa. 3. For each genomic compartment, we combine genome-wide nucleotide diversity (π) with divergence (D) from a high-quality outgroup. Because neutral mutation rate (μ) and divergence time cancel in the π/D ratio, this approach produces internally calibrated, chromosome-specific Nₑ ratios and is implemented as an open-source, automated pipeline. 4. Applying this framework to hominids and three ant species with a Y-like chromosome reveals Nₑ-ratio patterns that are consistent with known biology, demonstrating the method’s ability to recover species-specific signals of reproductive strategy and population history. We provide a fully implemented and well-documented computational tool to facilitate broad adoption. Together, this work establishes a generalizable and robust basis for inferring reproductive strategies and demographic history through comparative analyses of Nₑ ratios.
Full text 6,722 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Divergence-Calibrated Framework for Robust Cross-Species Comparison of Effective Population Size Ratios | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 13 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on A Divergence-Calibrated Framework for Robust Cross-Species Comparison of Effective Population Size Ratios Authors : Liangyu Lu 0009-0005-2685-4842 , wennan dai , Yuhao Pan 0000-0001-6060-1084 , and zheng yan [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176830951.16997718/v1 128 views 71 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract 1. Comparing effective population size (Nₑ) ratios among autosomes, the X, Y, and mitochondrial genomes is a powerful approach for inferring sex-specific demography and selection; however, chromosome- and lineage-specific mutation-rate differences have prevented reliable cross-species comparisons. 2. We introduce a phylogenetically informed framework that uses interspecific divergence to calibrate chromosome-specific mutation rates, yielding unbiased Nₑ ratios that are free of external priors and directly comparable across diverse taxa. 3. For each genomic compartment, we combine genome-wide nucleotide diversity (π) with divergence (D) from a high-quality outgroup. Because neutral mutation rate (μ) and divergence time cancel in the π/D ratio, this approach produces internally calibrated, chromosome-specific Nₑ ratios and is implemented as an open-source, automated pipeline. 4. Applying this framework to hominids and three ant species with a Y-like chromosome reveals Nₑ-ratio patterns that are consistent with known biology, demonstrating the method’s ability to recover species-specific signals of reproductive strategy and population history. We provide a fully implemented and well-documented computational tool to facilitate broad adoption. Together, this work establishes a generalizable and robust basis for inferring reproductive strategies and demographic history through comparative analyses of Nₑ ratios. Supplementary Material File (ne_12.20_.docx) Download 13.84 MB File (table1_ne_simple.xls) Download 31.00 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 13 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords genetics method development multiple theoretical Authors Affiliations Liangyu Lu 0009-0005-2685-4842 Lanzhou University View all articles by this author wennan dai Lanzhou University View all articles by this author Yuhao Pan 0000-0001-6060-1084 Lanzhou University View all articles by this author zheng yan [email protected] Lanzhou University View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 128 views 71 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Liangyu Lu, wennan dai, Yuhao Pan, et al. A Divergence-Calibrated Framework for Robust Cross-Species Comparison of Effective Population Size Ratios. Authorea . 13 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176830951.16997718/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176830951.16997718/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe32373cb400db4',t:'MTc3OTE5NDA5NA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00