Seeking to quantify contributions that fisheries operations can make to a global Nature Positive goal

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Amidst global efforts to address biodiversity loss, the concept of ‘Nature Positive’ has gained traction as a societal goal aligned with the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). While the goal is increasingly being embraced by businesses and governments, there has been little investigation into how fisheries, a key sector in the global economy and a major driver of marine biodiversity loss, could go beyond ‘sustainable fishing’ to contribute towards Nature Positive and the GBF. Here, we begin to fill this gap. We first draw on literature on the mitigation hierarchy and transformative actions for businesses to offer a conceptual framework outlining how fisheries’ direct operations could contribute towards Nature Positive. We then use publicly available information from the Marine Stewardship Council's certification process and develop an example metric based on the UK’s Biodiversity Net Gain metric, to work through the framework for three case study fisheries. Finally, we gain expert insights into stakeholder’s perception of a Nature Positive approach to fisheries management to inform future avenues. Our findings offer a practical first step to support fisheries to contribute to nature recovery on a global scale as part of best practice fisheries management. We also highlight that pathways towards Nature Positive contributions will differ considerably between fisheries, with critical knowledge gaps hampering the potential for ‘like-for-like’ net positive outcomes in all fisheries. This study represents a first step towards Nature Positive pathways for fisheries, with implications for policy, business and research.
Full text 2,238 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Amidst global efforts to address biodiversity loss, the concept of ‘Nature Positive’ has gained traction as a societal goal aligned with the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). While the goal is increasingly being embraced by businesses and governments, there has been little investigation into how fisheries, a key sector in the global economy and a major driver of marine biodiversity loss, could go beyond ‘sustainable fishing’ to contribute towards Nature Positive and the GBF. Here, we begin to fill this gap. We first draw on literature on the mitigation hierarchy and transformative actions for businesses to offer a conceptual framework outlining how fisheries’ direct operations could contribute towards Nature Positive. We then use publicly available information from the Marine Stewardship Council's certification process and develop an example metric based on the UK’s Biodiversity Net Gain metric, to work through the framework for three case study fisheries. Finally, we gain expert insights into stakeholder’s perception of a Nature Positive approach to fisheries management to inform future avenues. Our findings offer a practical first step to support fisheries to contribute to nature recovery on a global scale as part of best practice fisheries management. We also highlight that pathways towards Nature Positive contributions will differ considerably between fisheries, with critical knowledge gaps hampering the potential for ‘like-for-like’ net positive outcomes in all fisheries. This study represents a first step towards Nature Positive pathways for fisheries, with implications for policy, business and research. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z925 Subjects Biodiversity, Marine Biology

Keywords

Biodiversity Net Gain, Orange roughy, King scallop, Bluefin tuna, fisheries management Dates Published: 2025-04-25 15:10 Last Updated: 2025-04-25 15:10 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and code can be provided upon request to lead author Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00