Heavy menstrual bleeding on direct factor Xa inhibitors: the MEDEA randomized clinical trial.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-19

The MEDEA randomized clinical trial was an independent, investigator-initiated study supported by Boehringer Ingelheim that evaluated heavy menstrual bleeding associated with direct factor Xa inhibitors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-19 · read from full text

The MEDEA trial was an independent, investigator-initiated study supported by Boehringer Ingelheim to evaluate the safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors regarding heavy menstrual bleeding. The research received ethical approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers and required written informed consent from all participants. Multiple authors contributed equally to the design, analysis, and interpretation of the results, with no competing interests disclosed. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically investigating heavy menstrual bleeding as a potential adverse event or indication for anticoagulant therapy in patients who may have underlying gynecological conditions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,114 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Ack

The MEDEA trial was an independent, investigator-initiated study supported by Boehringer Ingelheim (BI). BI had no role in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results in this study; BI was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as it relates to BI substances, as well as intellectual property considerations. The trial received approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Participants provided written informed consent. E.N.H., H.M.W., B.A.H., H.R.B., S.M., and L.J.S. participated in all aspects of the study and authored the manuscript. All authors interpreted data, reviewed drafts and approved the final version of the manuscript. There are no competing interests to disclose. The authors meet the criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Fn Group

Handling Editor: Dr Bethany Samuelson Bannow Eva N. Hamulyák and Hanke M. G. Wiegers contributed equally to this work. Saskia Middeldorp and Luuk J. J. Scheres share senior authorship.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC