Perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement: report of a case

review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-09 ⓘ

Reviewing eight cases of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement, the authors found that wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty prevented recurrence while narrow excision led to two recurrences.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report reviews eight instances of perineal endometriosis involving the anal sphincter to compare surgical outcomes between wide and narrow excision techniques. The authors analyzed patient data to determine that wide excision combined with primary sphincteroplasty resulted in no recurrences, whereas narrow excision led to two recurrences among four cases. Although the study is limited by a small sample size and variable follow-up periods, it concludes that wide excision offers the best chance for cure and functional preservation, particularly in younger patients. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the surgical management of perineal lesions with anal sphincter involvement.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement is an infrequent occurrence. Wide excision is the best chance of cure of perineal endometriosis but may cause incontinence when the anal sphincter is involved. Conversely, narrow excision may result in incomplete removal, with increased recurrence rates and need of additional therapy. Wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty and narrow excision surgical techniques are reviewed. METHODS: One case report of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement and previously reported cases were reviewed. Patients were compared based on type of resection (wide or narrow excision) and outcome. RESULTS: Since 1957 there have been seven reported cases of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement, with the present authors adding one additional case for a total of eight. The mean age was 33 (range, 22-47) years. Surgical treatment included wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty (2 cases), narrow excision (4 cases), and incomplete excision (1 case). One case spontaneously regressed after a subsequent pregnancy. There were two recurrences in the narrow excision group and no recurrences in the wide excision group. There were no complications reported for any of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Although follow-up time was variable and the numbers small, wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty for patients with perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement seems to be the best chance of cure with good functional results. It should be considered particularly in younger patients to obviate the need of long-term subsequent hormonal therapy or re-excision for symptomatic recurrences. In contrast, patients closer to menopause (when endometriosis tends to regress) may be treated optimally by narrow excision to avoid the risks of significant anal sphincter resection.
Full text 1,977 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement is an infrequent occurrence. Wide excision is the best chance of cure of perineal endometriosis but may cause incontinence when the anal sphincter is involved. Conversely, narrow excision may result in incomplete removal, with increased recurrence rates and need of additional therapy. Wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty and narrow excision surgical techniques are reviewed.

Methods

One case report of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement and previously reported cases were reviewed. Patients were compared based on type of resection (wide or narrow excision) and outcome.

Results

Since 1957 there have been seven reported cases of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement, with the present authors adding one additional case for a total of eight. The mean age was 33 (range, 22-47) years. Surgical treatment included wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty (2 cases), narrow excision (4 cases), and incomplete excision (1 case). One case spontaneously regressed after a subsequent pregnancy. There were two recurrences in the narrow excision group and no recurrences in the wide excision group. There were no complications reported for any of the procedures.

Conclusions

Although follow-up time was variable and the numbers small, wide excision with primary sphincteroplasty for patients with perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement seems to be the best chance of cure with good functional results. It should be considered particularly in younger patients to obviate the need of long-term subsequent hormonal therapy or re-excision for symptomatic recurrences. In contrast, patients closer to menopause (when endometriosis tends to regress) may be treated optimally by narrow excision to avoid the risks of significant anal sphincter resection.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Anal Canal Anal Canal Endometriosis Perineum Adult Anal Canal Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Perineum Pregnancy Prognosis Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-26T06:15:21.694264+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:36.046895+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-26T06:30:31.687879+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine